| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 20:30:07 -0500, " Uncle Peter"
wrote: Well, I test every component before I install it, and so far most of the NOS carbon resistors have been well within tolerance. Carbon resistors made much before 1950 do have some issues with aging, and I find 50 to 75% well out of spec and they do get changed. I'd bet most of the resistors you were changing in 1959 are probably the same vintage that are found bad today. I won't argue metal films aren't better, but I haven't had problems with good quality carbons either. Over the years, I have found that carbon comp resistors with a matte finish are much more likely to increase in ohmic value that those with a glossy finish. I surmise that the former are much more hygroscopic than the latter. Brian McAllister Sarasota, Florida email bkm at oldtech dot net |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| non-inductive resistors: metal-film vs carbon ? | Antenna | |||
| F.S. 100 ohm 2 watt resistors N.O.S. | Boatanchors | |||
| Who sells high wattage non-inductive resistors? | Antenna | |||
| WTB: 100K 2 watt carbon resistors NOS | Boatanchors | |||
| WTB: 100K 2 watt carbon resistors NOS | Boatanchors | |||