RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Boatanchors (https://www.radiobanter.com/boatanchors/)
-   -   AM operation of KWM? (https://www.radiobanter.com/boatanchors/76859-am-operation-kwm.html)

Bret Ludwig August 22nd 05 11:54 PM

AM operation of KWM?
 

I saw an auction for a Sampson Modulator which looks to be a way to
apply full plate modulated audio to the output section of a Collins
transmitter or transceiver. it has the "11 pin octal" socket which is
used, aside from relays, only two places I know of, the Collins S-Line
ham equipment and Hammond organ speaker cabs.

First, is that what this is?

Second, since the KWM-2 has no AM position, how is the BFO disabled
for AM rx operation? The audio would be unpleasant even if intelligible
if AM were listened to in a SSB mode.


My guess is that this was actually intended for illicit 11 meter use
but would be usable on any band.


COLIN LAMB August 23rd 05 04:39 AM

Actually, receiving am with a bfo is fine. You are just copying 1/2 of the
sideband. The Drake 1A came out when am was still popular and no am
detector or switch. Called exhalted carrier or something like that.

I think there were a number of rigs that use the 11 pin plug. The Johnson
products, including the Ranger and Pacemaker and Valiant, if I recall
correctly. But, do not shoot me, please, if I am wrong. My wife points out
my faults often.

73, Colin K7FM



Dan/W4NTI August 25th 05 12:36 AM


"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com...

I saw an auction for a Sampson Modulator which looks to be a way to
apply full plate modulated audio to the output section of a Collins
transmitter or transceiver. it has the "11 pin octal" socket which is
used, aside from relays, only two places I know of, the Collins S-Line
ham equipment and Hammond organ speaker cabs.

First, is that what this is?

Second, since the KWM-2 has no AM position, how is the BFO disabled
for AM rx operation? The audio would be unpleasant even if intelligible
if AM were listened to in a SSB mode.


My guess is that this was actually intended for illicit 11 meter use
but would be usable on any band.


11 pin Octal socket was used on a LOT of equipment in the 50/60s.

Your right tho....sounds like some sort of CB junk to me.

I used Collins S-lines and KWM2s for years. Never ever heard of a outboard
"AM Modulator". Why anyone would want to do that is beyond me.

Dan/W4NTI



Gregg August 25th 05 02:30 AM

Behold, Dan/W4NTI scribed on tube chassis:


"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com...

I saw an auction for a Sampson Modulator which looks to be a way to
apply full plate modulated audio to the output section of a Collins
transmitter or transceiver. it has the "11 pin octal" socket which is
used, aside from relays, only two places I know of, the Collins S-Line
ham equipment and Hammond organ speaker cabs.

First, is that what this is?

Second, since the KWM-2 has no AM position, how is the BFO disabled for
AM rx operation? The audio would be unpleasant even if intelligible if
AM were listened to in a SSB mode.


My guess is that this was actually intended for illicit 11 meter use
but would be usable on any band.


11 pin Octal socket was used on a LOT of equipment in the 50/60s.

Your right tho....sounds like some sort of CB junk to me.

I used Collins S-lines and KWM2s for years. Never ever heard of a
outboard "AM Modulator". Why anyone would want to do that is beyond me.

Dan/W4NTI


Looking at my 1963 ARRL Radio Amateur's Handbook, outboard modulators
were the "in" thing back then.

--
Gregg "t3h g33k"
http://geek.scorpiorising.ca
*Ratings are for transistors, tubes have guidelines*

-ex- August 25th 05 04:24 AM

Gregg wrote:




11 pin Octal socket was used on a LOT of equipment in the 50/60s.

Your right tho....sounds like some sort of CB junk to me.

I used Collins S-lines and KWM2s for years. Never ever heard of a
outboard "AM Modulator". Why anyone would want to do that is beyond me.

Dan/W4NTI



Looking at my 1963 ARRL Radio Amateur's Handbook, outboard modulators
were the "in" thing back then.


Not on SSB rigs.
-Bill

Bret Ludwig August 25th 05 09:54 PM


-ex- wrote:
Gregg wrote:

snip
Dan/W4NTI



Looking at my 1963 ARRL Radio Amateur's Handbook, outboard modulators
were the "in" thing back then.


Not on SSB rigs.
-Bill



That's the point. If you HAD a KWM and wanted to work AM, apparently
this was the thing.


-ex- August 25th 05 10:21 PM

Bret Ludwig wrote:
-ex- wrote:

Gregg wrote:


snip

Dan/W4NTI


Looking at my 1963 ARRL Radio Amateur's Handbook, outboard modulators
were the "in" thing back then.


Not on SSB rigs.
-Bill




That's the point. If you HAD a KWM and wanted to work AM, apparently
this was the thing.


Uh...I was referring to the 1963 Handbook comment.

-Bill

Bret Ludwig August 25th 05 11:12 PM

By 1963, AM was called "Ancient Mary" in ham circles, which is why
Collins didn't provide for it. 11 meters was and is a different story.
It is of course illegal to operate a S-Line or any other
non-type-certified CB transmitter on that band, which makes the
practice all the more fun for the dedicated "Chicken Bandit".


Michael Black August 26th 05 02:26 AM


-ex- ) writes:
Bret Ludwig wrote:
-ex- wrote:

Gregg wrote:


snip

Dan/W4NTI


Looking at my 1963 ARRL Radio Amateur's Handbook, outboard modulators
were the "in" thing back then.


Not on SSB rigs.
-Bill




That's the point. If you HAD a KWM and wanted to work AM, apparently
this was the thing.


Uh...I was referring to the 1963 Handbook comment.

-Bill


Obviously, if you wanted AM on an SSB rig, you'd have little choice
but to add an external plate modulator (unless you unbalanced the balanced
modulator(s) and bypassed the crystal filter if it was a filter rig).

But yes, external modulators seemed common at that time, and maybe
for a longer period. When the US Novice license came along, it made
a certain amount of sense to have the modulator external, so the rig
was initially cheaper and you didn't need a modulator until you upgraded
your license.

An external modulator was also a way of dividing the weight. Get the
heavy modulation transformer out of the main rig.

But from reading of material from that period, nobody seemed to be
plate modulating an SSB rig.

Michael VE2BVW


-ex- August 26th 05 02:27 AM

Bret Ludwig wrote:

By 1963, AM was called "Ancient Mary" in ham circles, which is why
Collins didn't provide for it. 11 meters was and is a different story.
It is of course illegal to operate a S-Line or any other
non-type-certified CB transmitter on that band, which makes the
practice all the more fun for the dedicated "Chicken Bandit".


Ok.

-Bill

-ex- August 26th 05 03:30 AM

Michael Black wrote:



But from reading of material from that period, nobody seemed to be
plate modulating an SSB rig.

Michael VE2BVW


Thank you.

-Bill

Bret Ludwig August 26th 05 05:37 AM

Plate modulation is not a way of producing SSB. The SSB signal must be
amplified linearly, and generated at low level. FM, I believe, not only
can but benefits from being run through a Class C stage. The idea with
plate modulation was that the RF path was CW all the way to the finals,
and the audio directly modulated the final amp. The modulated signal
then had to be handled only in a linear fashion, but that was at the rx
end-the last stage in the tx being, obviously, the final.

The gizmo we are looking at seems to be a simple mod xfmr placed in
the plate supply to the 6146s in the tx. An audio amp such as a stereo
or guitar amp hooks to it and the mic goes to a preamp. In fact my
guess is back then a guitar amp was exactly what was most used.


-ex- August 26th 05 05:49 AM

Bret Ludwig wrote:

Plate modulation is not a way of producing SSB.


Ok, you are vindicated.

-BM

Gary Schafer August 26th 05 04:15 PM

On 25 Aug 2005 21:37:42 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote:

Plate modulation is not a way of producing SSB. The SSB signal must be
amplified linearly, and generated at low level. FM, I believe, not only
can but benefits from being run through a Class C stage. The idea with
plate modulation was that the RF path was CW all the way to the finals,
and the audio directly modulated the final amp. The modulated signal
then had to be handled only in a linear fashion, but that was at the rx
end-the last stage in the tx being, obviously, the final.

The gizmo we are looking at seems to be a simple mod xfmr placed in
the plate supply to the 6146s in the tx. An audio amp such as a stereo
or guitar amp hooks to it and the mic goes to a preamp. In fact my
guess is back then a guitar amp was exactly what was most used.


Well, you can't use it to plate modulate a kwm2 or collins S line
either. The finals in those transmitters can not be run in class C.
There is not enough grid drive available in the CW mode to do it. Also
the plate tank components are not hefty enough for the added plate
voltage plate modulation supplies. Neither is their power supply heavy
enough for AM operation.

73
Gary K4FMX

Michael Black August 26th 05 06:16 PM


"Bret Ludwig" ) writes:
Plate modulation is not a way of producing SSB. The SSB signal must be
amplified linearly, and generated at low level. FM, I believe, not only
can but benefits from being run through a Class C stage. The idea with
plate modulation was that the RF path was CW all the way to the finals,
and the audio directly modulated the final amp. The modulated signal
then had to be handled only in a linear fashion, but that was at the rx
end-the last stage in the tx being, obviously, the final.

Well actually, you could do phasing at high levels. And depending on
the high level balanced modulator, it just might be plate modulation.

You put two high level balanced modulators at the output of what
amounts to a CW transmitter. The balanced modulators knock out the carrier.
Then you use the phasing method to knock out the unwanted sideband.

No commercial rig did it this way. I'm not so sure any homebrew rig
did it. But it is within the realm of possibility. Certainly, there
were a fair number of articles for high level balanced modulators so
you could take an existing rig and output DSBsc. It was far easier
to add such a stage, or modify the output stage of an existing transmitter
to make it a balanced modulator, than to put in a low level balanced
modulator and then linearize the rest of the transmitter.

Michael VE2BVW

The gizmo we are looking at seems to be a simple mod xfmr placed in
the plate supply to the 6146s in the tx. An audio amp such as a stereo
or guitar amp hooks to it and the mic goes to a preamp. In fact my
guess is back then a guitar amp was exactly what was most used.




Edward Knobloch August 26th 05 10:03 PM

Hi,

CQ magazine, May '65 page 75, gave a simple method
of transmitting a.m. with a KWM-2.
They said if you unbalance the pot
in the KWM-2 "carrier balance" circuit
(on the right front side, on top of the chassis),
but leave the trimmer capacitor alone, you can get about
90mA of plate current due to the carrier, about 15W out
with the rig in SSB position.
Keep the mic level down so the plate current barely flickers on peaks,
and you will be transmitting a.m. with one sideband.
Return the pot to its original position for SSB use.
Chuck Scheuers said he tried it and that it works.

QST had a better method, reinserting carrier
after the mechanical filter, by adding it to the PTO output
using a variable pot for carrier level control
in place of the headphone jack on the front of the KWM-2.
See June '63 QST page 48. (A correction appeared,
that turret connection E40A should read E20A).
The relay connection information in the article applies to the older,
non-plug-in relays (Winged emblem KWM-2).
Relay K4 shorts out the carrier injection during receive.
With this method, you should run 120mA carrier plate current,
and will get about 25W carrier out.

73,
Ed Knobloch

Chuck Harris August 26th 05 10:27 PM

Edward Knobloch wrote:
Hi,

CQ magazine, May '65 page 75, gave a simple method
of transmitting a.m. with a KWM-2.


And Swan 350's had the carrier balance (null) pot right on the front
panel, and they claimed that allowed you 125W dc input AM on all bands.

Unfortunately, the carrier is injected before the SSB filter, and since the
filter's rejection skirt is positioned well over the top of the carrier(better
SSB carrier rejection, you see), you lose most of your carrier power before
you even start.

There was a certain amount of interest in running early SSB rigs in AM
mode, but fortunately that faded rapidly.

-Chuck

Sparks August 30th 05 12:47 AM

The Globe DSB 100 did! Sparks


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com