Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
First, my thank you's are in order to all who have answered my posts
concerning this amplifier...I have not yet fired it up, but I'm getting there! (Taking it easy and following the good advice I've received). Anyway, I've browsed the Heathkit manual and their instructions for tuning the amp seem rather complicated....they tend to focus on tuning for output and very specific plate and grid currents. Would it be safe for me to instead use the following procedure (which is likely to get me to the same point, but is easier to remember....it's the technique we used t for the old club amplifier): 1) Turn on amplifier (of course) and allow it to warm up. 2) Set exciter for 80 watts output on cw (amp is supposed to take 100 watts, but I want to be on the safe side). 3) Set pulsed tuner aid so that I am running about a 25% duty cycle (average power into amp will be 80 watts peak, but only 20 watts average). 4) Set amp tune and plate controls to suggested starting points. 5) Switch amp out of bypass. 6) Tune amp "Load" for max power out, adjust "Tune" to dip plate current, check grid and plate currents. 7) Increase pulsed exciter power gradually while repeating step 6. 7) Repeat step 7 until desired power out is achieved (keeping in mind that I need to stay well within allowed grid and plate currents). In a nutshell, that's how I remember tuning our club amp (although it was near 20 years ago when I last tuned one.) Does this sound about right? It seems much faster than the steps outlined by Heathkit and safer too...also, would there be any problems with my signal if I keep the exciter power fairly low...say at around 50 to 80 watts rather than the 100 watts specified? (Granted, my output power will be lower, but that is fine...especially while I'm still just testing the amp and if any RFI will be generated by the amp.) Thanks a bunch! Craig KB8FGC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Straydog wrote:
because that reflected power will end up being dissipated in the tube/heatsink. Another "Old Wives Tale"! Tubes are only "matched" to the point where the desired output is obtained. Reflected power will see the amp as a mismatch and will again be reflected back towards the antenna. 73, Roger -- Remove tilde (~) to reply Remember the USS Liberty (AGTR-5) http://ussliberty.org/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Roger D Johnson wrote: Straydog wrote: because that reflected power will end up being dissipated in the tube/heatsink. Another "Old Wives Tale"! Tubes are only "matched" to the point where the desired output is obtained. All depends on your definition of matched. Reflected power will see the amp as a mismatch and will again be reflected back towards the antenna. I think that is only partly true. Yes, there will be reflectd power going back out to the antenna, but there was an article in QST back a number of years ago. Yes, the mismatch also results in higher plate dissipation, too. I will correct myself about reflected power being disipated in tube, but the mismatch will increase the plate dissipation. The other issue is being off plate resonance. I had my SB-230 trip the overtemp relay when I moved frequency and did not retune the final. You also need to allow for loss in the transmission line. Not all of what gets reflected at the mismatches ends up at the other end of the transmission line. SWR (i.e. reflected power generated at the antenna/feedline) would not be a problem if the transmission line were long and lossy. 73, Roger -- Remove tilde (~) to reply Remember the USS Liberty (AGTR-5) http://ussliberty.org/ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Reflected Power usually gets dissipated in the coax, but may result in unusual currents and voltages in the Plate output circuit and may not allow a proper load. Whatever your Amp or proceedure, Pi-network outputs require maximum loading. It results in maximum output = maximum efficiency = minimum harmonics and distortion. Even a minor loading misajustment results in a big rise in harmonics and distortion. Your Club tuneup routine is an excellent proceedure since you would be providing sufficient drive at peaks and If a peak reading meter were handy, very meaningful. CW at the 80-100 watts would also be useful but there is little need to lean on it for more than a couple of seconds while looking at meters and tweeking a knob. Always keep an eye on grid currents as they are the most fragile they will be metered if it matters in your Amp (or protected somehow). Once tuned to maximum output in this fashion, you can reduce drive, confident that the final stage is fully loaded. Do this with a 50 ohm Dummy load so that you will know what this is supposed to look like as it is easier to do a little tweeking on the air versus tune-up from scratch into an impossible load. "Straydog" wrote in message x.com... On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Roger D Johnson wrote: Straydog wrote: because that reflected power will end up being dissipated in the tube/heatsink. Another "Old Wives Tale"! Tubes are only "matched" to the point where the desired output is obtained. All depends on your definition of matched. Reflected power will see the amp as a mismatch and will again be reflected back towards the antenna. I think that is only partly true. Yes, there will be reflectd power going back out to the antenna, but there was an article in QST back a number of years ago. Yes, the mismatch also results in higher plate dissipation, too. I will correct myself about reflected power being disipated in tube, but the mismatch will increase the plate dissipation. The other issue is being off plate resonance. I had my SB-230 trip the overtemp relay when I moved frequency and did not retune the final. You also need to allow for loss in the transmission line. Not all of what gets reflected at the mismatches ends up at the other end of the transmission line. SWR (i.e. reflected power generated at the antenna/feedline) would not be a problem if the transmission line were long and lossy. 73, Roger -- Remove tilde (~) to reply Remember the USS Liberty (AGTR-5) http://ussliberty.org/ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JB wrote:
Reflected Power usually gets dissipated in the coax, but may result in unusual currents and voltages in the Plate output circuit and may not allow a proper load. Why would reflected power be any more dissipated than forward power? 73, Roger -- Remove tilde (~) to reply Remember the USS Liberty (AGTR-5) http://ussliberty.org/ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Craig,
If it were me I would follow the Heath Kit instructions. I built that amplifier in 1976, still have it. I have run it at 500 ma for many years with it still putting out max power. I have had to replace the power supply filter capacitors, other than than been a good 600 watts output amplifier. While it might take a little longer to tune up, once you know what the setting should be for a given frequency, you then can preset those and save yourself alot of time. Larry/W4LM wrote in message oups.com... First, my thank you's are in order to all who have answered my posts concerning this amplifier...I have not yet fired it up, but I'm getting there! (Taking it easy and following the good advice I've received). Anyway, I've browsed the Heathkit manual and their instructions for tuning the amp seem rather complicated....they tend to focus on tuning for output and very specific plate and grid currents. Would it be safe for me to instead use the following procedure (which is likely to get me to the same point, but is easier to remember....it's the technique we used t for the old club amplifier): 1) Turn on amplifier (of course) and allow it to warm up. 2) Set exciter for 80 watts output on cw (amp is supposed to take 100 watts, but I want to be on the safe side). 3) Set pulsed tuner aid so that I am running about a 25% duty cycle (average power into amp will be 80 watts peak, but only 20 watts average). 4) Set amp tune and plate controls to suggested starting points. 5) Switch amp out of bypass. 6) Tune amp "Load" for max power out, adjust "Tune" to dip plate current, check grid and plate currents. 7) Increase pulsed exciter power gradually while repeating step 6. 7) Repeat step 7 until desired power out is achieved (keeping in mind that I need to stay well within allowed grid and plate currents). In a nutshell, that's how I remember tuning our club amp (although it was near 20 years ago when I last tuned one.) Does this sound about right? It seems much faster than the steps outlined by Heathkit and safer too...also, would there be any problems with my signal if I keep the exciter power fairly low...say at around 50 to 80 watts rather than the 100 watts specified? (Granted, my output power will be lower, but that is fine...especially while I'm still just testing the amp and if any RFI will be generated by the amp.) Thanks a bunch! Craig KB8FGC |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Craig...At one time I had 4 SB230's
Now I have one on hf, and one converted to 6 meters. Either tune by the book, or tune for maximum output....either way, just do it fast. The only big mistake to your steps I can see is not to start at 80 watts....that is close to full drive. I would say to start at around 20 watts. Make SURE the SWR that the amp sees is reasonable. ...less than 1.8:1 or so....If you have a tuner in that path, make sure it can handle the power....nothing MFJ!!! Key down your rig while watching the amps' RF output and spin the plate knob quickly each way to find a 'kick' or peak in output. At 20 watts drive, I'd expect 150 or so watts out. Stop transmitting, and wait 5 or 10 seconds. Now is the part that you only learn from experiance....it'd be nice if you were doing it with a TS520's 6146 final....instead of an unobtanium 8873....But.... you need to transmit, and tune the load control while simultaneously juggling the plate control. All the while looking at the wattmeter for more output. At some point, rotating the load and peaking with the plate will NOT end up in more output. That is where you stop. Now you can increase power from the rig to whatever you want...but the load and plate will have to be 'touched up' again with the increased drive. Pulsers are kind of a waste. Someone who has used an amp for a while should be able to tune it up in 2 or 3 three second transmissions. If you are playing with knobs while key down for 15 to 20 seconds, you shouldn't own an amp!! ....Dave wrote in message oups.com... First, my thank you's are in order to all who have answered my posts concerning this amplifier...I have not yet fired it up, but I'm getting there! (Taking it easy and following the good advice I've received). Anyway, I've browsed the Heathkit manual and their instructions for tuning the amp seem rather complicated....they tend to focus on tuning for output and very specific plate and grid currents. Would it be safe for me to instead use the following procedure (which is likely to get me to the same point, but is easier to remember....it's the technique we used t for the old club amplifier): 1) Turn on amplifier (of course) and allow it to warm up. 2) Set exciter for 80 watts output on cw (amp is supposed to take 100 watts, but I want to be on the safe side). 3) Set pulsed tuner aid so that I am running about a 25% duty cycle (average power into amp will be 80 watts peak, but only 20 watts average). 4) Set amp tune and plate controls to suggested starting points. 5) Switch amp out of bypass. 6) Tune amp "Load" for max power out, adjust "Tune" to dip plate current, check grid and plate currents. 7) Increase pulsed exciter power gradually while repeating step 6. 7) Repeat step 7 until desired power out is achieved (keeping in mind that I need to stay well within allowed grid and plate currents). In a nutshell, that's how I remember tuning our club amp (although it was near 20 years ago when I last tuned one.) Does this sound about right? It seems much faster than the steps outlined by Heathkit and safer too...also, would there be any problems with my signal if I keep the exciter power fairly low...say at around 50 to 80 watts rather than the 100 watts specified? (Granted, my output power will be lower, but that is fine...especially while I'm still just testing the amp and if any RFI will be generated by the amp.) Thanks a bunch! Craig KB8FGC |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'd like to add one item to Dave's post below for caheaton's benefit: If you don't have a 50-52 ohm dummy load (pure resistance, dry or oil, whatever, but with capability to handle 100-200 watts of dissipation for at least as long as you will be spinning those knobs), please get one. And, learn how that amplifier tunes up going into a known, low SWR dummy load (your SWR meter is between the transceiver and the amp). Your antenna tunner (which is between the amp and the antenna feedline) shoud be tuned up for low SWR _BEFORE_ you turn on the amp. After you know the SWR is low, then turn on the amp and drive it with, say, that 20 watts of carrier, or with the microphone gain turned down. Once you are statisfied that the SWR is low with/without the amp in the circuit, then you can crank up either the carrier (alone) for touch-up tuning, or crank up the audio gain (and watch the room lights flicker, etc). And, I'll go along with the recommendation below to do the tune up pretty fast. ===== no change to below, included for reference and context ===== On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Dave Edwards wrote: Craig...At one time I had 4 SB230's Now I have one on hf, and one converted to 6 meters. Either tune by the book, or tune for maximum output....either way, just do it fast. The only big mistake to your steps I can see is not to start at 80 watts....that is close to full drive. I would say to start at around 20 watts. Make SURE the SWR that the amp sees is reasonable. ...less than 1.8:1 or so....If you have a tuner in that path, make sure it can handle the power....nothing MFJ!!! Key down your rig while watching the amps' RF output and spin the plate knob quickly each way to find a 'kick' or peak in output. At 20 watts drive, I'd expect 150 or so watts out. Stop transmitting, and wait 5 or 10 seconds. Now is the part that you only learn from experiance....it'd be nice if you were doing it with a TS520's 6146 final....instead of an unobtanium 8873....But.... you need to transmit, and tune the load control while simultaneously juggling the plate control. All the while looking at the wattmeter for more output. At some point, rotating the load and peaking with the plate will NOT end up in more output. That is where you stop. Now you can increase power from the rig to whatever you want...but the load and plate will have to be 'touched up' again with the increased drive. Pulsers are kind of a waste. Someone who has used an amp for a while should be able to tune it up in 2 or 3 three second transmissions. If you are playing with knobs while key down for 15 to 20 seconds, you shouldn't own an amp!! ...Dave wrote in message oups.com... First, my thank you's are in order to all who have answered my posts concerning this amplifier...I have not yet fired it up, but I'm getting there! (Taking it easy and following the good advice I've received). Anyway, I've browsed the Heathkit manual and their instructions for tuning the amp seem rather complicated....they tend to focus on tuning for output and very specific plate and grid currents. Would it be safe for me to instead use the following procedure (which is likely to get me to the same point, but is easier to remember....it's the technique we used t for the old club amplifier): 1) Turn on amplifier (of course) and allow it to warm up. 2) Set exciter for 80 watts output on cw (amp is supposed to take 100 watts, but I want to be on the safe side). 3) Set pulsed tuner aid so that I am running about a 25% duty cycle (average power into amp will be 80 watts peak, but only 20 watts average). 4) Set amp tune and plate controls to suggested starting points. 5) Switch amp out of bypass. 6) Tune amp "Load" for max power out, adjust "Tune" to dip plate current, check grid and plate currents. 7) Increase pulsed exciter power gradually while repeating step 6. 7) Repeat step 7 until desired power out is achieved (keeping in mind that I need to stay well within allowed grid and plate currents). In a nutshell, that's how I remember tuning our club amp (although it was near 20 years ago when I last tuned one.) Does this sound about right? It seems much faster than the steps outlined by Heathkit and safer too...also, would there be any problems with my signal if I keep the exciter power fairly low...say at around 50 to 80 watts rather than the 100 watts specified? (Granted, my output power will be lower, but that is fine...especially while I'm still just testing the amp and if any RFI will be generated by the amp.) Thanks a bunch! Craig KB8FGC |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks again to the group for all the advice. Yes, I had planned on making
sure the antenna was tuned before hitting it with the amp (guess I should have mentioned that). The tuner I bought should take the power okay...recently purchased a used (but in great shape) Nye Viking MB-II. I also have a Heathkit Cantenna dummy load (with oil) I purchased at the same Hamfest, so I should be all set in that department. I've also run a dedicated circit for the amp (240 volts) and while I was at it ran a dedicated 120 volt circuit for the rest of my shack's equipment....so at least the amp shouldn't be dimming the lights! :-) Thanks again and please keep up the discussion....I'm absorbing all of this collected wisdom and will blend it to form my own procedure....hopefully none of this will be for naught! 73, Craig KB8FGC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
bandspread tuning tutorial? | Shortwave | |||
Grunding mini 100 PE adjusting tuning... | Shortwave | |||
FS: Hallicrafters HT-4 Transmitter Tuning Units $30 | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Hallicrafters HT-4 Transmitter Tuning Units $30 | Boatanchors | |||
Hallicrafters Tuning Units For HT-4 | Swap |