Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this to say, Rich, that IBOC sounds worse than what Sirius has? (Yeah, I
installed one in the car a while ago, although I haven't had a lot of time to listen because not soon after I've had a series of long-term mechanics needs.) I've noticed that Sirius uses different codecs rates for their streams...the voice-based streams are particularly low-fi, with artifacts that I can hear pretty easily. The music-based streams obviously use a higher-quality codecs, although even then I can still hear artifacts similar to what Windows Media Player will exhibit on even high-rate streams. Yes, I'm a "golden-eared *******", as I can still hear the difference between vinyl and CD recordings. For the same reasons, I won't use an iPod or similar MP3 device because I can't stand the fidelity loss (and needless to say, that means that downloading music is not an option...free or otherwise, it's not worth the price)...but seeing as you've said you have a Sirius receiver yourself, where would you put IBOC (AM and FM versions) with the Sirius streams? In any event, I suspect that I'd be similarly underwhelmed with either IBOC service (I'm just barely satisfied with the Canadian DRB solution, although in fairness, it does sound better than the associated analog services, at least). -- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- "Rich Wood" wrote in message ... On 3 Mar 2004 16:06:09 GMT, Steve Stone wrote: Thinking about updating a high end home audio system. Should I wait for IBOC to be brought out for consumers or will I be waiting a real long time for this to happen ?? I've heard IBOC. The last thing you want to connect it to is a high end audio system. It's sort of like buying a Rolls Royce and using it to haul manure. Rich |