Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely.
The only restriction on subcarriers is injection levels, crosstalk to the main carrier and other technical considerations. It used to be that the main carrier must be programmed when a subcarrier was in operation, but I think the FCC eliminated that requirement about 10 years or so ago. I don't think (but check with a good broadcast attorney) that there's even decency regulations imposed on subcarrier operations, since it won't be available to the general public. For those stations who wouwld want to do a good thing, one might even consider giving a non-profit entity, like a local blind association, access to a subcarrier for a reading service and the like, and thus the in-kind contribution might be a no-cost writeoff of several thousand dollars a year (but again, talk with a good tax attorney). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- If there's nothing that offends you in your community, then you know you're not living in a free society. Kim Campbell - ex-Canadian Prime Minister - 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- "Bill Doerner" wrote in message ... Here's a piece of minutia. Yesterday, we were approached about leasing a subcarrier on a translator we own and operate. Question... Is it legal for a commercial translator to sell it's subcarriers for revenue? I don't see this addressed directly in the rules? Any thoughts? Thanks |