"Tim Perry" wrote in message
...
a pretty safe assumption would be that the management and accountants took
a
look at the cost of a full power back up and said something like: "figure
out a way to do this for 30% less"

This is how urban legends get started.

WFAN's 35 kw CP is for an auxiliary.

In article ,
Peter H. wrote:

Of all the DA-1 Class II-Bs, 1050 is the best engineered.

Let's see if that's still true after 1050 moves to Lodi.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman | As the Constitution endures, persons in every
| generation can invoke its principles in their own
Opinions not those of| search for greater freedom.
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. ___ (2003)

Of all the DA-1 Class II-Bs, 1050 is the best
engineered.

Let's see if that's still true after 1050 moves to Lodi.


No application on file.

"Tim Perry" wrote
with a 50 kW AM transmitter the power draw will be about 100 kW (maybe a
tad
less).
___________

Most 50 kW AM stations in the US are using a Harris DX series transmitter,
and it is about 86% efficient -- 58 kW AC input at 50 kW carrier.

Even with 100% sine wave modulation it consumes 'only' about 87 kW from the
AC line. Power consumption during normal programming is less than that.

RF

Even with 100% sine wave modulation it consumes 'only' about 87 kW from the AC
line. Power consumption during normal programming is less than that.


Indeed ... hence the not insignificant popularity of the DX-50 or 3DX-50.

IMO, the Nautel sounds better.

"Peter H." wrote in message
...


Even with 100% sine wave modulation it consumes 'only' about 87 kW from
the AC
line. Power consumption during normal programming is less than that.


Indeed ... hence the not insignificant popularity of the DX-50 or 3DX-50.

IMO, the Nautel sounds better.

Mine too. Had the opportunity to choose a few years ago for a new AM, and
went with a Nautel 100 kw with a 30 kw aux. Defintely a better sound.