Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On 23 Oct 2004 04:13:48 GMT, "Frank Dresser" wrote: "Fuller Wrath" wrote in message ... : 1. The Fairness Doctrine could be resurrected and rewritten to assure a balance of voices/opinions are heard on the public airwaves. So, why doesn't the government also require newspapers to have a balance of voices and opinions? Did you read the last two words -- public airwaves? Spectrum was considered a limited resource and government permission was required to use it. In return, conditions were imposed. Why are these conditions a good idea? If these conditions are a good idea, why aren't they a good idea for all the sources of a person's information? There is no apparent shortage of newsprint for purchase. Oh. Is that the only reason we don't have a fairness doctrine for the newspapers? Frank Dresser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What is the typical price/length of a syndicated radio news contract? | Broadcasting | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
Auto News Group Poster | General | |||
Auto News Group Poster | General |