High Definition
At least one of my local fm radio stations says that their radio station
"is now broadcasing in high-definition" on their radio frequency. So what I need to know now is Does anyone know where I can buy a high-definition radio? and how much do they cost? |
Call letters of the station please?
wrote in message ... At least one of my local fm radio stations says that their radio station "is now broadcasing in high-definition" on their radio frequency. So what I need to know now is Does anyone know where I can buy a high-definition radio? and how much do they cost? |
In article , wrote:
At least one of my local fm radio stations says that their radio station "is now broadcasing in high-definition" on their radio frequency. So what I need to know now is Does anyone know where I can buy a high-definition radio? and how much do they cost? :-) They probably cost more, sound worse, consume so much battery power that they have to be provided with a separate mains power supply (which isn't shown in the brochure of course), and will be enthusiastically advertised for at least two years before any of them actually appear in the shops, by which time you'll have forgotten why you were interested and spent your money on something much more worthwhile It won't be available as an option in the new car you're thinking of buying, and half the programmes will be transmitted in mono. Rod. |
In article , wrote:
At least one of my local fm radio stations says that their radio station "is now broadcasing in high-definition" on their radio frequency. So what I need to know now is Does anyone know where I can buy a high-definition radio? and how much do they cost? Typical radio promotion gimick. Here is an excerpt from Chuck Blore's future book showing how things were done 'back then' ----------------------- When High Fidelity was a big deal in records, Gordon's stations were all Hi-Fi Radio." "What made them Hi-Fi. Was that just a name?" "Oh no. He always made it seem very special. And very real. When we began promoting "Hi-Fi is coming to radio" all the stations were told to back off the higher frequencies of the actual signal a little bit each day for two weeks. Without anyone really noticing, at least that was the theory, the actual stations signal gradually became kind of dull, and duller. But then, we had the big announcement ... `Ladies and Gentlemen. Welcome a new millenia in radio broadcasting. This is K E L P HI-FI RADIO' and with that we slapped all those frequency adjustments back to normal and, Oh God! What a difference." ------------------------- Don't believe 50% of what you hear on radio promos, the ignore the remainder -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com |
|
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:34:03 +0000, dvdguy2 wrote:
At least one of my local fm radio stations says that their radio station "is now broadcasing in high-definition" on their radio frequency. So what I need to know now is Does anyone know where I can buy a high-definition radio? and how much do they cost? Find your local Kenwood Car audio dealer, Kenwood has 9 models that support the HD Tuner module. or http://www.crutchfield.com/S-2VARpjD...g=186750&avf=Y |
|
|
"Biz" wrote:
wrote: At least one of my local fm radio stations says that their radio station "is now broadcasing in high-definition" on their radio frequency. So what I need to know now is Does anyone know where I can buy a high-definition radio? and how much do they cost? Call letters of the station please? He probably doesn't remember, but dollars to donuts he has a recording of it on cassette tape somewhere... -- jayembee |
--
X-No-archive: yes "jayembee" wrote in message ... "Biz" wrote: wrote: At least one of my local fm radio stations says that their radio station "is now broadcasing in high-definition" on their radio frequency. So what I need to know now is Does anyone know where I can buy a high-definition radio? and how much do they cost? Call letters of the station please? He probably doesn't remember, but dollars to donuts he has a recording of it on cassette tape somewhere... -- jayembee ============================== The HORRIBLE thing, is that dvdputz is correct for the first time. Several Seattle stations are broadcasting in "high definition" also: http://www.king.org/hdradio/ http://www.ibiquity.com/hdradio/ http://www.simplebits.com/notebook/2...0/hdradio.html http://www.wfuv.org/wfuv/digitalradio.html I think his being correct, however, is just an accident. ============================= |
Richard C. ) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
The HORRIBLE thing, is that dvdputz is correct for the first time. Several Seattle stations are broadcasting in "high definition" also: http://www.king.org/hdradio/ When the broadcaster doesn't know what is going on with current technology, it doesn't bode well for new technology. A snippet from that page: ================================================== =============== What does it mean that 98.1 KING FM is broadcasting in HD Radio=3F Technology? For those with digital receivers, the noise and interference that cause the static, hiss, pops, and fades heard on today's analog radios will be virtually eliminated. ================================================== =============== There is no static, hiss, or pops on FM radio. Fading (which includes loss of stereo) is the only artifact of a reduced-quality FM signal. -- Jeff Rife | "The Babylon Project was our last, best hope | for peace.... It failed." | | -- Commander Susan Ivanova, 2260 |
Bill Turner ) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
On 1 Apr 2005 00:25:22 GMT, Jeff Rife wrote: There is no static, hiss, or pops on FM radio. Fading (which includes loss of stereo) is the only artifact of a reduced-quality FM signal. __________________________________________________ _________ That statement is true only if the signal to noise ratio is high. If the noise is strong enough, you will hear it even without fading of the FM signal. No, if the signal to noise ratio is that low, there *is* no usable signal at all, and what you hear is the amplification of "nothing"...basically the same thing you hear when you tune to a spot where no station exists. -- Jeff Rife | "One minute we were spanking each other with | meat, and the next minute it got weird." | | -- Joe Hackett, "Wings" |
In article , Jeff Rife wrote:
There is no static, hiss, or pops on FM radio. Fading (which includes loss of stereo) is the only artifact of a reduced-quality FM signal. __________________________________________________ _________ That statement is true only if the signal to noise ratio is high. If the noise is strong enough, you will hear it even without fading of the FM signal. No, if the signal to noise ratio is that low, there *is* no usable signal at all, and what you hear is the amplification of "nothing"...basically the same thing you hear when you tune to a spot where no station exists. True. If the signal fades, eventually you'll lose reception of *any* type of radio transmission. AM, FM and digital simply die different deaths, viz- AM - programme volume decreases and gradually disappears into noise. FM - noise increases and gradually overwhelms programme. Digital - nothing noticeable at all at first, then screetches and yelps and suddenly disappears altogether. Rod. |
"Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On 2 Apr 2005 23:56:43 GMT, Jeff Rife wrote: No, if the signal to noise ratio is that low, there *is* no usable signal at all, and what you hear is the amplification of "nothing"...basically the same thing you hear when you tune to a spot where no station exists. __________________________________________________ _________ Nonsense. You obviously don't listen to weak FM signals which can be heard, but with noise. Ham radio operators using FM do it all the time. My disagreement here is with your original statement "There is no static, hiss, or pops on FM radio." That statement is too broad to be correct. There are lots of exceptions. Yes - especially if by "FM radio" you include the standard broadcast stereo imlementation - where the stereo difference signal gets progressively noisier, meaning many radios include a force MONO button, as the stereo sum (i.e. mono audio) "lasts longer" - and clear mono may be preferable to poor stereo? I realise this is because the difference signal is carried using additional modulation techniques, but when talking about "FM" radio as a consumer product, most people mean FM VHF stereo as broadcast, rather than a purely FM modulation technique? Steve |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com