|
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
JSF wrote:
Looks as good as the last one, why the changes? Is there active bias? looks like it. Still glad to see that there is someone that cares about their work. The other amp makers do very ****ty work and looks like it. While I commend you on your emphasis on 'quality', it's too bad you are wasting your talents building 'CB' amplifiers. The amateur radio community could use a source of quality 'legal' 160-10 solid state amps. 73 "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message oups.com... The new SkyWave amplifier project is coming along nicely. I'm buiding up some prototype units for evaluation. This is one of them... http://www.telstar-electronics.com/2879ABTC%20PCB.htm |
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
Oh no... the expert Mr. Bush has discovered me... and will expose me...
LOL Go ahead... make me laugh George. www.telstar-electronics.com I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote: By comparison to this piece of ****? Man, no wonder you're -still- embarrassed. Learn about amp biasing then perhaps you can comment on the fraudulent claims Griffey makes. |
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
"Katz" wrote in
oups.com: JSF wrote: Looks as good as the last one, why the changes? Is there active bias? looks like it. Still glad to see that there is someone that cares about their work. The other amp makers do very ****ty work and looks like it. While I commend you on your emphasis on 'quality', it's too bad you are wasting your talents building 'CB' amplifiers. The amateur radio community could use a source of quality 'legal' 160-10 solid state amps. 73 Hams would still be able to build their own amps if dumbed down licensing hadn't turned them all into appliance operators. Sc |
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
Katz,
Actually, about 80% of the amps that I build go to amateurs. This is really not an amp for most CBers due to the premium price. Most CBers buy strictly on price... and don't consider harmonic content or reliability. www.telstar-electronics.com Katz wrote: While I commend you on your emphasis on 'quality', it's too bad you are wasting your talents building 'CB' amplifiers. The amateur radio community could use a source of quality 'legal' 160-10 solid state amps. |
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
Capability and ability are 2 vastly different things.
-- Clif "Fast Code" wrote in message t... On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:37:39 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Hams would still be able to build their own amps if dumbed down licensing hadn't turned them all into appliance operators. Hams can still build their own amps, FOOL. It's all there in Part 97 for those who can read. LMFAO at the 'tard. |
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
ups.com... Yes, there will be a bi-color led on the front panel... green for receive... red for transmit. As for the SSB delay... it's still automatic like the previous model. How is it automatic? I see no circuit that senses the difference between AM and SSB and adjusts the delay time to compensate. You are just splitting the difference in the time needed for the COR circuit to operate. It's either going to chatter on SSB or lag on AM or possibly both. Amps have a reason for selective delay and quite frankly it's not much money or trouble to add this necessity. |
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
You are correct... there is one delay for both modes. As the designer,
my feeling is that a switchable AM to SSB delay is not necessary. My experience has been that a reasonable delay can be chosen that is acceptable to both modes. Actually, a slight delay in all modes has a distinct advantage when the amplifier is mounted in a remote location such as the trunk of the vehicle. It allows the operator to confirm that the amplifer was pulled in on the last transmission by numbing the receive (during the delay) for a very short time after the mic button is released. Without this effect, the operator has no real way of confirming the amplifier is operating to some level, since the relay can't be heard. www.telstar-electronics.com DrDeath wrote: How is it automatic? I see no circuit that senses the difference between AM and SSB and adjusts the delay time to compensate. You are just splitting the difference in the time needed for the COR circuit to operate. It's either going to chatter on SSB or lag on AM or possibly both. Amps have a reason for selective delay and quite frankly it's not much money or trouble to add this necessity. |
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 01:08:37 +0000 (UTC), "Fast Code"
wrote: On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:37:39 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Hams would still be able to build their own amps if dumbed down licensing hadn't turned them all into appliance operators. Hams can still build their own amps, FOOL. It's all there in Part 97 for those who can read. LMFAO at the 'tard. LMFAO at the one who doesn't understand the difference between "would be able to", "can" and "are allowed to". |
SkyWave 2879ABTC...
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
ups.com... You are correct... there is one delay for both modes. As the designer, my feeling is that a switchable AM to SSB delay is not necessary. As a consumer I feel it is a necessity. My experience has been that a reasonable delay can be chosen that is acceptable to both modes. I disagree. Maybe the average Joe Blow doesn't mind a slow AM delay or a SSB that chatters, but I do. Actually, a slight delay in all modes has a distinct advantage when the amplifier is mounted in a remote location such as the trunk of the vehicle. It allows the operator to confirm that the amplifer was pulled in on the last transmission by numbing the receive (during the delay) for a very short time after the mic button is released. Without this effect, the operator has no real way of confirming the amplifier is operating to some level, since the relay can't be heard. You add a LED to the remote switch tie it in with the COR circuit, problem solved. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com