If you hate President Bush, you deserve to get your throat cut with a box cutter.
 

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:52:47 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in
oups.com:

SC

Violating the Constitution is what he's done.
nope at l3ast not till the Congress or the supreme court says so

I know the concept of inocent until proven guilty eledes but please
try not to act so stupid in piblic

My God! The irony is unbearable!!!!

If you hate President Bush, you deserve to get your throat cut with a box cutter.
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
. net...

And that goes double for the America hating socialist democrat party.


Watch this:

http://video.google.com/videosearch?...e+change&hl=en

If you hate President Bush, you deserve to get your throat cut with a box cutter.
 

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:24:17 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:52:47 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in
oups.com:

SC

Violating the Constitution is what he's done.
nope at l3ast not till the Congress or the supreme court says so

I know the concept of inocent until proven guilty eledes but please
try not to act so stupid in piblic

My God! The irony is unbearable!!!!
then die prehaps if you can't bear it

you are the one runing around using the nick of the cheif vilian of
the Harry Pooter novels as your nick

Really? Never read the stuff. I'll have to ask my children.

If you hate President Bush, you deserve to get your throat cut with a box cutter.
 

wrote in message
oups.com...

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:24:17 GMT, "U-Know-Who"

you are the one runing around using the nick of the cheif vilian of
the Harry Pooter novels as your nick

Really? Never read the stuff. I'll have to ask my children.
you have been told that at 5 times by me show your level of reading
comprehenion


Nah, it just goes to show I don't give a **** what you say.

If you hate President Bush, you deserve to get your throat cut with a box cutter.
 

"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...
"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in
oups.com:

It is good to see Bush idiots like you remaining true to form.....it
will make it much easier for me to watch the Bush impeachment that is
coming.

Bush is history.

Laugh...laugh...laugh....

TMT

Slow Code wrote:
And that goes double for the America hating socialist democrat party.



President Bush has never broken the law. He hasn't got a thing to worry
about.

SC

Violating the Constitution is what he's done.


Really, When did that happen? I must have missed it.


SC

If you hate President Bush, you deserve to get your throat cut with a box cutter.
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...
"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in
oups.com:

It is good to see Bush idiots like you remaining true to form.....it
will make it much easier for me to watch the Bush impeachment that is
coming.

Bush is history.

Laugh...laugh...laugh....

TMT

Slow Code wrote:
And that goes double for the America hating socialist democrat party.



President Bush has never broken the law. He hasn't got a thing to worry
about.

SC

Violating the Constitution is what he's done.


Really, When did that happen? I must have missed it.


No doubt, you would.

If you hate President Bush, you deserve to get your throat cut with a box cutter.
 

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:46:10 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


President Bush has never broken the law. He hasn't got a thing to worry
about.

SC

Violating the Constitution is what he's done.


Really, When did that happen? I must have missed it.


Two years ago, the court rejected Bush's claim that he had authority
to seize and detain terrorism suspects and indefinitely deny them
access to courts or lawyers. In this follow-up case, the justices
focused solely on the issue of trials for some of the men.

The vote was split 5-3, with moderate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
joining the court's liberal members in most of the ruling against the
Bush administration. Chief Justice John Roberts, named to the lead the
court last September by Bush, was sidelined in the case because as an
appeals court judge he had backed the government over Hamdan.

Thursday's ruling overturned that decision.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/29/D8IHUVMO0.html