Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:17:12 -0800, John Smith wrote:
Vinnie S. Why yes, yes I do chat with them. And, in the central valley, ch 17 is in vogue, stupid-ass. If it's in such vogue, why would they want to go on the ham bands? Better yet, why would they spend the couple hundred dollars on a HF rig? Duh. And, although I have chatted with them on their modified 10m ham equip. many DO USE FROM THEIR HOMES OR DISPATCHERS USE, I most often chat 'em on the road to pass the time. Chat up a lot of hookers too! Bull****. Most of them are done with CB at the end of the day. I drive about 50,000 miles per year in my car, and speak to them quite often. I am not park on the couch during the day, like you are. Your a ****ing liar. Vinnie S. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith" wrote in message ... How many of your high powered linears are already ready for the 10-12-15-17-20+ meter bands? Think there will be a big influx of truckers to the ham bands, or will they stay put? According to some hams, there is so much hero worship of them, you chicken banders are just watering at the mouth to get on amateur HF's. What do you say? JS Dunno, John All I know is that when I had a problem in the 60s with a high powered am guy that jumped on my qso, I changed to cw. We contined our chat for a good 45 minutes and couldn't even hear that kilowatt station. Nothing like a small bandwidth and filters to go along with it. That doesn't mean that the high power stations can't communicate; it means that they are very unlikely to bother a couple of cw stations, regardless of power. And the voice is not spread evenly. You can give a 50 to 1 power advantage away very easily. Even more, if the cw stations have the proper filtering. At 40 - 50 words per minute, we weren't giving away much in terms of communications either LOL Interesting thing is that cw is legal anywhere in the ham bands .... ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim ps -75 watts buried the guy with the kilowatt plus rig. Go figure. 200 Hz bandwidth vs 3 KHz. He lost more than a 10 to 1 advantage. Old Mike (W2OY) sure was upset LOL |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Hampton wrote:
... Oh gawd, CW? I had to do that to get the ticket, don't really want to use it! JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:59:01 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote in : "John Smith" wrote in message ... How many of your high powered linears are already ready for the 10-12-15-17-20+ meter bands? Think there will be a big influx of truckers to the ham bands, or will they stay put? According to some hams, there is so much hero worship of them, you chicken banders are just watering at the mouth to get on amateur HF's. What do you say? JS Dunno, John All I know is that when I had a problem in the 60s with a high powered am guy that jumped on my qso, I changed to cw. We contined our chat for a good 45 minutes and couldn't even hear that kilowatt station. Nothing like a small bandwidth and filters to go along with it. That doesn't mean that the high power stations can't communicate; it means that they are very unlikely to bother a couple of cw stations, regardless of power. And the voice is not spread evenly. You can give a 50 to 1 power advantage away very easily. Even more, if the cw stations have the proper filtering. At 40 - 50 words per minute, we weren't giving away much in terms of communications either LOL Interesting thing is that cw is legal anywhere in the ham bands .... ![]() Hey Jim, you really need to give 1750M a shot. You'd love it! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Gilliland" wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:59:01 GMT, "Jim Hampton" wrote in : "John Smith" wrote in message ... How many of your high powered linears are already ready for the 10-12-15-17-20+ meter bands? Think there will be a big influx of truckers to the ham bands, or will they stay put? According to some hams, there is so much hero worship of them, you chicken banders are just watering at the mouth to get on amateur HF's. What do you say? JS Dunno, John All I know is that when I had a problem in the 60s with a high powered am guy that jumped on my qso, I changed to cw. We contined our chat for a good 45 minutes and couldn't even hear that kilowatt station. Nothing like a small bandwidth and filters to go along with it. That doesn't mean that the high power stations can't communicate; it means that they are very unlikely to bother a couple of cw stations, regardless of power. And the voice is not spread evenly. You can give a 50 to 1 power advantage away very easily. Even more, if the cw stations have the proper filtering. At 40 - 50 words per minute, we weren't giving away much in terms of communications either LOL Interesting thing is that cw is legal anywhere in the ham bands .... ![]() Hey Jim, you really need to give 1750M a shot. You'd love it! Years ago I used to do 1750. Just before I gave away my equipment I took it out and loaded up an old AM broadcast antenna that was off the air. That was fun until the mall security came by and asked what I was doing.. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
clean up ham radio SC start by truning in your license | CB | |||
Ladie & Gentlemen, START YOUR ENGINES!! | CB | |||
How can I start broadcasting?? | Broadcasting |