Thanks K7DYY...
 

Thanks goes out to K7DYY for sending me his PCB to help with my new
design...

http://www.telstar-electronics.com/d...s/WhatsNew.htm

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 20 Dec 2006 10:59:17 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:

Thanks goes out to K7DYY for sending me his PCB to help with my new
design...


Aw jeez, you aren't going to try 11m Class E, are you? You haven't
even mastered the basic concept of linearity! I can see it now.....
Class E turned broadband by substituting the high-Q filter for a
ferrite balun resulting in harmonics all the way up to UHF. Can you
say "finger stock"?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Aw jeez, you aren't going to try 11m Class E, are you? You haven't
even mastered the basic concept of linearity! I can see it now.....
Class E turned broadband by substituting the high-Q filter for a
ferrite balun resulting in harmonics all the way up to UHF. Can you
say "finger stock"?

Frank... as usual... I have no idea what you're babbling about.
You're as nutty as a Chrismas fruitcake.

See the latest project at:
http://www.telstar-electronics.com/d...s/WhatsNew.htm

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 21 Dec 2006 04:19:36 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Aw jeez, you aren't going to try 11m Class E, are you? You haven't
even mastered the basic concept of linearity! I can see it now.....
Class E turned broadband by substituting the high-Q filter for a
ferrite balun resulting in harmonics all the way up to UHF. Can you
say "finger stock"?

Frank... as usual... I have no idea what you're babbling about.
You're as nutty as a Chrismas fruitcake.

See the latest project at:
http://www.telstar-electronics.com/d...s/WhatsNew.htm

Why would you put any energy into an audio speech processor?
You yourself have even discounted the usefulness of audio speech
processing when commenting in the past about Lou Franklins model.
Are you trying to tell us that you can re-invent a more useful wheel?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

wrote:
Why would you put any energy into an audio speech processor?
You yourself have even discounted the usefulness of audio speech
processing when commenting in the past about Lou Franklins model.
Are you trying to tell us that you can re-invent a more useful wheel?

You are absolutely right... I don't like Lou's design. His design clips
the hell out of the audio signal... and then attempts to filter his way
to sucess. Nice idea, but doesn't work well. However, I never said that
other types of processing didn't work.. or weren't effective. Reinvent
the wheel... no... Analog Devices has already taken care of that... I'm
just using their IC chip in my design. The audio distortion is very low
with this chip.

www.telstar-electronics.com

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 21 Dec 2006 05:36:58 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:

wrote:
Why would you put any energy into an audio speech processor?
You yourself have even discounted the usefulness of audio speech
processing when commenting in the past about Lou Franklins model.
Are you trying to tell us that you can re-invent a more useful wheel?

You are absolutely right... I don't like Lou's design. His design clips
the hell out of the audio signal... and then attempts to filter his way
to sucess. Nice idea, but doesn't work well. However, I never said that
other types of processing didn't work.. or weren't effective. Reinvent
the wheel... no... Analog Devices has already taken care of that... I'm
just using their IC chip in my design. The audio distortion is very low
with this chip.


The distortion specs for the chip are given so the designer can decide
whether the chip is good enough for the studio or stage; for CB radio
it's overkill. Regardless, you missed the point once again: audio
compression -IS- distortion. IOW, hook it up to a distortion meter,
crank it up to 15:1, start talking and that needle will bounce all
over the place. The chip also has some other issues that you really
need to research first.

Want a decent compression circuit? Start with a bucket-brigade chip
like the old SAD-1024. That way the control signal can be adjusted for
a peak -before- it slams into the VCA. This eliminates the need for
frequency compensation, which is a common problem with real-time and
feedback types of compression circuits, including the SSM2166. It also
allows you to get higher compression with no distortion from spurious
harmonics that would otherwise need filtering. And the circuit has a
couple other benefits: it reduces feedback which is great when some
dope modifies his radio for talkback, and you can use the chip to make
some really cool sound effects such as echo and reverb.

But I suppose it's easier to hack someone else's design than learn
things for yourself, isn't it, Brian?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
The distortion specs for the chip are given so the designer can decide
whether the chip is good enough for the studio or stage; for CB radio
it's overkill. Regardless, you missed the point once again: audio
compression -IS- distortion. IOW, hook it up to a distortion meter,
crank it up to 15:1, start talking and that needle will bounce all
over the place. The chip also has some other issues that you really
need to research first.

Want a decent compression circuit? Start with a bucket-brigade chip
like the old SAD-1024. That way the control signal can be adjusted for
a peak -before- it slams into the VCA. This eliminates the need for
frequency compensation, which is a common problem with real-time and
feedback types of compression circuits, including the SSM2166. It also
allows you to get higher compression with no distortion from spurious
harmonics that would otherwise need filtering. And the circuit has a
couple other benefits: it reduces feedback which is great when some
dope modifies his radio for talkback, and you can use the chip to make
some really cool sound effects such as echo and reverb.

But I suppose it's easier to hack someone else's design than learn
things for yourself, isn't it, Brian?

Now Frank... how could they allow a chip for studio or stage (as you
put it) that had audible distortion. The answer... they couldn't. I'm
talking harmonic distortion... not compression distortion... which you
can't hear anyway. As far as your frequency compensation... I have no
idea what you're talking about... but that's not surprising with all
your techno-babble.

www.telstar-electronics.com

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
The answer... the chip is most often used for gates and CVAs, not
compressors. Didn't I tell you to do your research?


Haha, I wish Frank lived down the road from me. He'd probably help me make
a clean sounding station. (clean is best imo)

--
Happy Holidays

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 21 Dec 2006 16:54:24 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:


Frank Gilliland wrote:
The distortion specs for the chip are given so the designer can decide
whether the chip is good enough for the studio or stage; for CB radio
it's overkill. Regardless, you missed the point once again: audio
compression -IS- distortion. IOW, hook it up to a distortion meter,
crank it up to 15:1, start talking and that needle will bounce all
over the place. The chip also has some other issues that you really
need to research first.

Want a decent compression circuit? Start with a bucket-brigade chip
like the old SAD-1024. That way the control signal can be adjusted for
a peak -before- it slams into the VCA. This eliminates the need for
frequency compensation, which is a common problem with real-time and
feedback types of compression circuits, including the SSM2166. It also
allows you to get higher compression with no distortion from spurious
harmonics that would otherwise need filtering. And the circuit has a
couple other benefits: it reduces feedback which is great when some
dope modifies his radio for talkback, and you can use the chip to make
some really cool sound effects such as echo and reverb.

But I suppose it's easier to hack someone else's design than learn
things for yourself, isn't it, Brian?

Now Frank... how could they allow a chip for studio or stage (as you
put it) that had audible distortion. The answer... they couldn't.


The answer... the chip is most often used for gates and CVAs, not
compressors. Didn't I tell you to do your research?


I'm
talking harmonic distortion... not compression distortion...


Like I tried to tell you before, harmonic distortion is a consequent
of compression and doesn't go away with a magic chip.


which you
can't hear anyway.


You most certainly -can- hear compression distortion. It saps the
dynamics of the sound. How much dynamics is lost depends on the amount
of compression.


As far as your frequency compensation... I have no
idea what you're talking about...


Imagine my suprise.


but that's not surprising with all
your techno-babble.


Well, here's some more techno-babble:

Real-time or feedback type compressors such as the SMM2166 use a
comparator to create the control signal and results in a "knee" in the
response curve. But any curve that has a knee is non-linear and
results in harmonic distortion (same as "compression distortion" in
your RF amps). Because the harmonics extend beyond the limit of your
audio bandwidth you must therefore limit that distortion with filters.
Since filters are non-linear with respect to frequency, and since
audio is an extremely wideband application, some part of the loop
(usually the preamp) must compensate for the diminishing high
frequency response (yes, even when the audio is limited to 3kHz).
That's called "frequency compensation" and is something that must be
included in the design of any compression circuit (or amplifier). You
can try to soften the knee by slowing the response time of the control
signal, but that results in spikes at the output because some of the
signal sneaks through during the time delay. So no matter what you do,
distortion is just an inescapable limitation of these circuits. If you
want to learn more on the subject, get an education.

And just to confuse you even more, there is another type of real-time
compression that works -=MUCH=- better than anything else. The audio
is modulated to RF, clipped, filtered, and then down-converted back to
audio. The result is hard clipping with no harmonic distortion. Pretty
slick, huh?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 02:46:43 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
The answer... the chip is most often used for gates and CVAs, not
compressors. Didn't I tell you to do your research?


Haha, I wish Frank lived down the road from me. He'd probably help me
make a clean sounding station. (clean is best imo)

Just make friends with the sound jock at your local dance hall. I ran
sound for a couple years and learned about ten times more about audio
than I did in college. I also drank about ten times more than I did in
college..... ::=burp=::

Nah, I have two friends that do the portable DJ thing and they don't know
dick about HF. They drink plenty while they're doing it too..I reckon
that's a perk tho.

Do you have a SSB 11 meter station anymore, Frank?

--
Happy Holidays

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 22 Dec 2006 02:46:43 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
The answer... the chip is most often used for gates and CVAs, not
compressors. Didn't I tell you to do your research?


Haha, I wish Frank lived down the road from me. He'd probably help me make
a clean sounding station. (clean is best imo)


Just make friends with the sound jock at your local dance hall. I ran
sound for a couple years and learned about ten times more about audio
than I did in college. I also drank about ten times more than I did in
college..... ::=burp=::

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 22 Dec 2006 03:22:39 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 02:46:43 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
The answer... the chip is most often used for gates and CVAs, not
compressors. Didn't I tell you to do your research?


Haha, I wish Frank lived down the road from me. He'd probably help me
make a clean sounding station. (clean is best imo)

Just make friends with the sound jock at your local dance hall. I ran
sound for a couple years and learned about ten times more about audio
than I did in college. I also drank about ten times more than I did in
college..... ::=burp=::

Nah, I have two friends that do the portable DJ thing and they don't know
dick about HF. They drink plenty while they're doing it too..I reckon
that's a perk tho.


I have noticed that most DJ's don't know squat about sound. Mixer
dudes for bands are a different breed.


Do you have a SSB 11 meter station anymore, Frank?


Absolutely. Right now I'm using that TRC-449 I got from Lance (where'd
he go these days?). It's probably not as much fun as your rig but then
I don't do DX on the CB. It just doesn't come in here very well.
Speaking of which, I took a trip to North Dakota a couple months ago.
As soon as I crossed the Rockies I heard the noise..... good god, it's
crappier on every channel than the single worst case I can remember
from Jacksonville, which was pretty noisy at times. How can anybody
talk over there -without- power?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 03:22:39 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 02:46:43 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
The answer... the chip is most often used for gates and CVAs, not
compressors. Didn't I tell you to do your research?


Haha, I wish Frank lived down the road from me. He'd probably help me
make a clean sounding station. (clean is best imo)

Just make friends with the sound jock at your local dance hall. I ran
sound for a couple years and learned about ten times more about audio
than I did in college. I also drank about ten times more than I did in
college..... ::=burp=::

Nah, I have two friends that do the portable DJ thing and they don't
know dick about HF. They drink plenty while they're doing it too..I
reckon that's a perk tho.

I have noticed that most DJ's don't know squat about sound. Mixer
dudes for bands are a different breed.

Do you have a SSB 11 meter station anymore, Frank?

Absolutely. Right now I'm using that TRC-449 I got from Lance (where'd
he go these days?). It's probably not as much fun as your rig but then
I don't do DX on the CB. It just doesn't come in here very well.
Speaking of which, I took a trip to North Dakota a couple months ago.
As soon as I crossed the Rockies I heard the noise..... good god, it's
crappier on every channel than the single worst case I can remember
from Jacksonville, which was pretty noisy at times. How can anybody
talk over there -without- power?

Hello Frank

Hrmm, copy the west east propagation flowing in... and it's always been
that way imo. Ever hear Ohio on that 449? (good radio btw)

--
Happy Holidays

mopathetic likes 'em clean!
 

Steveo wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
The answer... the chip is most often used for gates and CVAs, not
compressors. Didn't I tell you to do your research?


Haha, I wish Frank lived down the road from me. He'd probably help me make
a clean sounding station. (clean is best imo)

--
Happy Holidays

That's why he licks 'em

N8WWM BEGS FOR STEVEO
 

N8WWM the fruit of hobby communications" said
That's why he licks 'em

Lick what? I'll rub your face on the blacktop dogie. Is that considered a
licking?

I'll give you a New Year beating if'n you'll hold your mouth right...it's
on my way to Michigan anyway.

Invite me again, asshat.

--
Keep yourself to yourself and
keep your bedroll dry.

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 22 Dec 2006 05:20:05 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 03:22:39 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 02:46:43 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
The answer... the chip is most often used for gates and CVAs, not
compressors. Didn't I tell you to do your research?


Haha, I wish Frank lived down the road from me. He'd probably help me
make a clean sounding station. (clean is best imo)

Just make friends with the sound jock at your local dance hall. I ran
sound for a couple years and learned about ten times more about audio
than I did in college. I also drank about ten times more than I did in
college..... ::=burp=::

Nah, I have two friends that do the portable DJ thing and they don't
know dick about HF. They drink plenty while they're doing it too..I
reckon that's a perk tho.

I have noticed that most DJ's don't know squat about sound. Mixer
dudes for bands are a different breed.

Do you have a SSB 11 meter station anymore, Frank?

Absolutely. Right now I'm using that TRC-449 I got from Lance (where'd
he go these days?). It's probably not as much fun as your rig but then
I don't do DX on the CB. It just doesn't come in here very well.
Speaking of which, I took a trip to North Dakota a couple months ago.
As soon as I crossed the Rockies I heard the noise..... good god, it's
crappier on every channel than the single worst case I can remember
from Jacksonville, which was pretty noisy at times. How can anybody
talk over there -without- power?

Hello Frank

Hrmm, copy the west east propagation flowing in... and it's always been
that way imo. Ever hear Ohio on that 449?


Not very often. Sometimes catch the extreme east, but very rarely
anything between the Rockies and the Mississippi. It's gotta be the
mountains scattering the signal on a bounce or something like that,
but I've never done the math so I'm just guessing.


(good radio btw)


Generally yes, but after fixing a few I noticed it does have it's
issues. Like that ribbon cable for the display that often goes bad and
needs to be jumped. I'm just glad I could bring this one back from the
brink, it was in pretty rough shape. Are you running anything else
besides that furnace?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Are you running anything else
besides that furnace?

Furnace!? lol yeah I have a bunch of old radios, including Jim's' 2510 in
my truck.

--
Keep yourself to yourself and
keep your bedroll dry.

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Well, here's some more techno-babble:

Real-time or feedback type compressors such as the SMM2166 use a
comparator to create the control signal and results in a "knee" in the
response curve. But any curve that has a knee is non-linear and
results in harmonic distortion (same as "compression distortion" in
your RF amps). Because the harmonics extend beyond the limit of your
audio bandwidth you must therefore limit that distortion with filters.
Since filters are non-linear with respect to frequency, and since
audio is an extremely wideband application, some part of the loop
(usually the preamp) must compensate for the diminishing high
frequency response (yes, even when the audio is limited to 3kHz).
That's called "frequency compensation" and is something that must be
included in the design of any compression circuit (or amplifier). You
can try to soften the knee by slowing the response time of the control
signal, but that results in spikes at the output because some of the
signal sneaks through during the time delay. So no matter what you do,
distortion is just an inescapable limitation of these circuits. If you
want to learn more on the subject, get an education.

You're right... your response is nothing but techno babble. You need to
read the complete data sheet for the SSM2166
(http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/...s/SSM2166.pdf). It
faithfully reproduces an audio sinewave... but has an AGC. The harmonic
dostortion is less than 1% according to the spec. So far, my new design
is working well... and has constant audio punch level... no matter if
you whisper or yell into the mic Exactly what is needed! With the fast
attack/release of the noise gate feature.. this chip is fantastic at
blocking ambient background noise!

www.telstar-electronics.com

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 22 Dec 2006 06:10:17 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
om:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Well, here's some more techno-babble:

Real-time or feedback type compressors such as the SMM2166 use a
comparator to create the control signal and results in a "knee" in the
response curve. But any curve that has a knee is non-linear and
results in harmonic distortion (same as "compression distortion" in
your RF amps). Because the harmonics extend beyond the limit of your
audio bandwidth you must therefore limit that distortion with filters.
Since filters are non-linear with respect to frequency, and since
audio is an extremely wideband application, some part of the loop
(usually the preamp) must compensate for the diminishing high
frequency response (yes, even when the audio is limited to 3kHz).
That's called "frequency compensation" and is something that must be
included in the design of any compression circuit (or amplifier). You
can try to soften the knee by slowing the response time of the control
signal, but that results in spikes at the output because some of the
signal sneaks through during the time delay. So no matter what you do,
distortion is just an inescapable limitation of these circuits. If you
want to learn more on the subject, get an education.

You're right... your response is nothing but techno babble. You need to
read the complete data sheet for the SSM2166
(http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/...s/SSM2166.pdf).


I've had it in my files since the chip first came out. Studied it
several times. Even used the chip in a couple designs.


It
faithfully reproduces an audio sinewave... but has an AGC.


Any linear amplifier will "reproduce" a sinewave. If it has AGC then
how "faithfully" that sinewave is reproduced depends on the time
constant of the AGC loop.


The harmonic
dostortion is less than 1% according to the spec.


That's for a 1kHz sinewave with 1:1 (no) compression. That's pretty
crappy even for a CB, and proves that -you- didn't read the complete
datasheet. For comparison, look at the specs of the CA3080.


So far, my new design
is working well... and has constant audio punch level... no matter if
you whisper or yell into the mic Exactly what is needed!


If that's the case then you set the feedback time constant too slow
and built yourself a CVA, not a compressor. Look at the scope and you
will see spikes.


With the fast
attack/release of the noise gate feature.. this chip is fantastic at
blocking ambient background noise!


Yes, it works very well at blocking signals. So does a switch. The
problems start when it begins -passing- signals. Didn't I tell you to
do your research?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
I've had it in my files since the chip first came out. Studied it
several times. Even used the chip in a couple designs.


It
faithfully reproduces an audio sinewave... but has an AGC.


Any linear amplifier will "reproduce" a sinewave. If it has AGC then
how "faithfully" that sinewave is reproduced depends on the time
constant of the AGC loop.


The harmonic
dostortion is less than 1% according to the spec.


That's for a 1kHz sinewave with 1:1 (no) compression. That's pretty
crappy even for a CB, and proves that -you- didn't read the complete
datasheet. For comparison, look at the specs of the CA3080.


So far, my new design
is working well... and has constant audio punch level... no matter if
you whisper or yell into the mic Exactly what is needed!


If that's the case then you set the feedback time constant too slow
and built yourself a CVA, not a compressor. Look at the scope and you
will see spikes.


With the fast
attack/release of the noise gate feature.. this chip is fantastic at
blocking ambient background noise!


Yes, it works very well at blocking signals. So does a switch. The
problems start when it begins -passing- signals. Didn't I tell you to
do your research?

Well... it seems you are much smarter than the engineers at Analog
Devices... LOL
They could sure use someone like you. Why don't you send them your
resume?

www.telstar-electronics.com

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 23 Dec 2006 05:46:50 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
om:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
I've had it in my files since the chip first came out. Studied it
several times. Even used the chip in a couple designs.


It
faithfully reproduces an audio sinewave... but has an AGC.


Any linear amplifier will "reproduce" a sinewave. If it has AGC then
how "faithfully" that sinewave is reproduced depends on the time
constant of the AGC loop.


The harmonic
dostortion is less than 1% according to the spec.


That's for a 1kHz sinewave with 1:1 (no) compression. That's pretty
crappy even for a CB, and proves that -you- didn't read the complete
datasheet. For comparison, look at the specs of the CA3080.


So far, my new design
is working well... and has constant audio punch level... no matter if
you whisper or yell into the mic Exactly what is needed!


If that's the case then you set the feedback time constant too slow
and built yourself a CVA, not a compressor. Look at the scope and you
will see spikes.


With the fast
attack/release of the noise gate feature.. this chip is fantastic at
blocking ambient background noise!


Yes, it works very well at blocking signals. So does a switch. The
problems start when it begins -passing- signals. Didn't I tell you to
do your research?

Well... it seems you are much smarter than the engineers at Analog
Devices... LOL


Maybe. Maybe not. But I'm definitely smarter than you. I understand
how the chip works and its intended purpose, which is not the same as
the objective of your hacked design -- to increase the talk-power of a
CB radio.


They could sure use someone like you. Why don't you send them your
resume?


Why don't you spend some time and effort to learn about this stuff so
you can build something good instead of hacking other people's designs
and hoping they sell?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Steveo wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:

Are you running anything else
besides that furnace?


Furnace!? lol yeah I have a bunch of old radios, including Jim's' 2510 in
my truck.

Check Check... Did me good working countless op's worldwide with it.

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Why don't you spend some time and effort to learn about this stuff so
you can build something good instead of hacking other people's designs
and hoping they sell?

Frank, never hacked at anyones design. My designs are all original...
your designs are nonexistant... LOL

www.telstar-electronics.com

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 25 Dec 2006 08:07:13 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Why don't you spend some time and effort to learn about this stuff so
you can build something good instead of hacking other people's designs
and hoping they sell?

Frank, never hacked at anyones design. My designs are all original...


Right. Let's start with your earlier design, a 2-pill, push-pull
"linear" hacked from a Communications Concepts kit, which itself is a
hack from a Motorola datasheet; then when under pressure for a decent
bias circuit you hack a design from a ham's webpage on and refuse to
disclose the schematic. You start -this- thread by openly admitting
how you are hacking a "compressor" circuit from another ham. Yet you
maintain that none of your designs are hacked. I'm now convinced that
you have redefined the term "hacked" to suit your purposes, just like
you did with the word "linear", and will likely do with "compression".
Congratulations, you just graduated from the Presidential Academy of
Semantics.


your designs are nonexistant... LOL


And once again you're back to the "sour grapes" excuse..... you should
have stopped with the 'lying president' emulation.

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Right. Let's start with your earlier design, a 2-pill, push-pull
"linear" hacked from a Communications Concepts kit, which itself is a
hack from a Motorola datasheet; then when under pressure for a decent
bias circuit you hack a design from a ham's webpage on and refuse to
disclose the schematic. You start -this- thread by openly admitting
how you are hacking a "compressor" circuit from another ham. Yet you
maintain that none of your designs are hacked. I'm now convinced that
you have redefined the term "hacked" to suit your purposes, just like
you did with the word "linear", and will likely do with "compression".
Congratulations, you just graduated from the Presidential Academy of
Semantics.

Frank, you evidently think that once an IC or transistor is used in a
design... that if someone else uses that same transistor or IC... that
the new design has hacked the existing one.
No wonder you never designed anything... LOL

www.telstar-electronics.com

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 26 Dec 2006 02:50:21 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:


Frank Gilliland wrote:
Right. Let's start with your earlier design, a 2-pill, push-pull
"linear" hacked from a Communications Concepts kit, which itself is a
hack from a Motorola datasheet; then when under pressure for a decent
bias circuit you hack a design from a ham's webpage on and refuse to
disclose the schematic. You start -this- thread by openly admitting
how you are hacking a "compressor" circuit from another ham. Yet you
maintain that none of your designs are hacked. I'm now convinced that
you have redefined the term "hacked" to suit your purposes, just like
you did with the word "linear", and will likely do with "compression".
Congratulations, you just graduated from the Presidential Academy of
Semantics.

Frank, you evidently think that once an IC or transistor is used in a
design... that if someone else uses that same transistor or IC... that
the new design has hacked the existing one.


Hey Kreskin, in your case it does because you don't have enough
understanding of the theory to design and assemble anything from
scratch.


No wonder you never designed anything... LOL


You claim to be an engineer. So what happens when you design something
for your employer? Who owns the design?

Thanks K7DYY...
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Hey Kreskin, in your case it does because you don't have enough
understanding of the theory to design and assemble anything from
scratch.

You claim to be an engineer. So what happens when you design something
for your employer? Who owns the design?

Frank, as usual... you are getting off on a tangent because you have no
other defense. This conversation is over for me. Nuff said.

www.telstar-electronics.com

Thanks K7DYY...
 

On 27 Dec 2006 11:52:12 -0800, "Pouting Brian"
wrote in
om:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Hey Kreskin, in your case it does because you don't have enough
understanding of the theory to design and assemble anything from
scratch.

You claim to be an engineer. So what happens when you design something
for your employer? Who owns the design?

Frank, as usual... you are getting off on a tangent because you have no
other defense. This conversation is over for me. Nuff said.


The employer owns the design. I have no right or control over any
design made under the direction of any of my previous employers. That
means I can't use them, I can't re-use them, I can't sell them and I
can't publically disclose them. The only reason I'm mentioning this is
because it was pointed out to me that a lot of people don't know this.
But it really doesn't matter to you since you were never an engineer
and are now back to your pouting routine. Works for me.