This has got to hurt...
 

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-269018A1.html

This has got to hurt...
 

Scott in Baltimore wrote:
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-269018A1.html

Looks like Mr. Duckworth, being a typical cber, was born stupid and
stayed that way.

This has got to hurt...
 

Scott in Baltimore wrote:
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-269018A1.html

He won't pay it, Barney.

--
Be the rain.

This has got to hurt...
 

"cmdr buzz corey" wrote:
Scott in Baltimore wrote:
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-269018A1.html

Looks like Mr. Duckworth, being a typical cber, was born stupid and
stayed that way.

What's your excuse, buzz boy?

--
Be the rain.

This has got to hurt...
 

On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:17:33 -0500, Scott in Baltimore
wrote:

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-269018A1.html


He wasn't too bright. He got busted for 100 watts, and then went on to transmit
2,500 watts. Then he didn't bother disassembling the setup when the FCC showed
up. Nice fine !

Vinnie S.

This has got to hurt...
 

Scott in Baltimore wrote:
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-269018A1.html

Looks like Mr. Duckworth, being a typical cber, was born stupid and
stayed that way.


http://www.nocode.org/articles/riley_quotes.html

"My experience is that higher class ops are the problem ops." (emphasis added)


Vinnie S.

This has got to hurt...
 

Vinnie S. wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:17:33 -0500, Scott in Baltimore
wrote:

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-269018A1.html


He wasn't too bright.

Standard for a cber.

This has got to hurt...
 

On 6 Jan 2007 13:56:33 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"
wrote:


Vinnie S. wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:17:33 -0500, Scott in Baltimore
wrote:

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-269018A1.html


He wasn't too bright.

Standard for a cber.


Not according to this guy. Ever heard of him?

http://www.nocode.org/articles/riley_quotes.html

My experience is that higher class ops are the problem ops." (emphasis added)


Vinnie S.