On Aug 25, 4:48 pm, Telstar Electronics
wrote:
On Aug 25, 5:01 pm,cmdr buzz
wrote:

That is far beyond any cber's ability. IF they can get it installed
they will crank everything up to the max to make sure they get all the
"swang" on the meter they can and splatter across all channels.

Well... you may be right about the first part... lol
But as far as getting as much swing... that would be a neat trick with
an audio device AGC such as VoiceMax. You see the AGC holds the
modulation up no matter what level the input is... therefore no
swing... just constant maximum modulation output. VoiceMax actually
doubles the power of any CB by taking the average modulation to 100%.www.telstar-electronics.com

To get the average modulation to 100% then you have to be
overmodulating.

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:46:27 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:42:26 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

On Aug 25, 1:34 pm, 777 wrote:
It wasn't about the junk, it was about you... Griffey da spammer

Always good to hear from you 777...
666 might be a better repsonse

???
Griff has been spamming for quite some time... Yes indeed the old
timer said that ... You know griff from back in the painkiller days

On Aug 26, 12:12 am, cmdr buzz corey
wrote:
To get the average modulation to 100% then you have to be
overmodulating.

Absolutely not!
If you hold the modulation right at 100%... guess what the average
is... lol
www.telstar-electronics.com

On Aug 26, 6:22 am, Telstar Electronics
wrote:
On Aug 26, 12:12 am, cmdr buzz corey
wrote:

To get the average modulation to 100% then you have to be
overmodulating.

Absolutely not!
If you hold the modulation right at 100%... guess what the average
is... lolwww.telstar-electronics.com

Still sounds like the mode would be 100% with the mean slightly below.

On Aug 26, 4:27 am, 777 wrote:
Griff has been spamming for quite some time... Yes indeed the old
timer said that ... You know griff from back in the painkiller days

Thanks for the history lesson... lol
Now, do you have anything to add to the real conversation here?
I didn't think so.
www.telstar-electronics.com

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:24:11 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

|On Aug 25, 8:41 am, "vince" wrote:
|Modern radios have all that
| built in and an older radio would not benefit from it.
|
|Thanks for your comment Vince... but your statement is simply
|incorrect. There is no AGC circuit for transmitted audio in any modern
|CB radio.
|http://www.telstar-electronics.com/d...evelopment.htm
|
|---------------

Brian

that maybe the one thing you have stated that maybe correct. One of
the first thing most CBers do is open the unit up and disable any AGC
circuit that limits modulation.

james

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:05:11 -0000, Paul Johnson
wrote:

|On Aug 26, 6:22 am, Telstar Electronics
|wrote:
| On Aug 26, 12:12 am, cmdr buzz corey
| wrote:
|
| To get the average modulation to 100% then you have to be
| overmodulating.
|
| Absolutely not!
| If you hold the modulation right at 100%... guess what the average
| is... lolwww.telstar-electronics.com
|
|Still sounds like the mode would be 100% with the mean slightly below.
|-------------

It maybe possible to get to 100% average modulation without
overmodulation. Still such a signal is really unitelligable and not
worth the effort to achieve it. A voice so compressed that the peakto
average amplitudes are equal will more than likely yield a totally
unitelligable signal.

I also doubt the claims of 100% average modulation. A decent signal
would have about 50% average modulation. After that, you have nothing
but a trashy signal in my opinion. Also the claims of double the power
are truley absurd.

james

On Aug 26, 7:22 am, Telstar Electronics
wrote:
On Aug 26, 12:12 am,cmdr buzz
wrote:

To get the average modulation to 100% then you have to be
overmodulating.

Absolutely not!
If you hold the modulation right at 100%... guess what the average
is... lolwww.telstar-electronics.com

You can modulate over 100% on positive peaks, assuming the power
supplied to the final final amp stage being modulated can handle the
extra power without clipping the envelope, but you can't go over 100%
on negative peaks without distortion. So to get an average modulation
of 100% with reasonable signal quality you would have to over modulate
on positive peaks and never go over 100% on negative peaks. I doubt
your processor nor any cb can handle that. So you can't just "hold the
modulation at 100%".

On Aug 26, 7:50 pm, james wrote:
It maybe possible to get to 100% average modulation without
overmodulation. Still such a signal is really unitelligable and not
worth the effort to achieve it. A voice so compressed that the peakto
average amplitudes are equal will more than likely yield a totally
unitelligable signal.

Absolute nonsense. Why do you think that sustaining 100% modulation
will render the signal unintelligible? The modulation percentage has
to do with the level of modulation applied to the transmitter. As long
as you stay below overmodulation (100%) then if the modulation signal
has not been clipped... or waveshape altered in any way except size...
then your modulation will be perfect... and it will contain all the
intelligence it had originally. Not only can it be done... people who
have VoiceMax do it every day.
www.telstar-electronics.com

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:18:02 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

On Aug 26, 4:27 am, 777 wrote:
Griff has been spamming for quite some time... Yes indeed the old
timer said that ... You know griff from back in the painkiller days

Thanks for the history lesson... lol
Now, do you have anything to add to the real conversation here?

YES!!!
Please stop the spamming of the group...
I doubt you will respond to that with your boring banter...
Stop Spamming Brian Griffey.....