RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   CB (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/)
-   -   This Place is a Sewer (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/137735-place-sewer.html)

MeatSack October 29th 08 04:08 AM

This Place is a Sewer
 
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:40:47 -0400, jim wrote:

* was fishing for someone to start an on
* topic post. It was an SWR vs feed length thing. I don't believe so with
* the limited length in a mobile installation (though you quote 18' which
* is particularly long IMHO). In your opinion why does it matter? Regards,
* Jim.

Have a look at this site. Answers a lot of questions. Have fun.

MeatSack...---...
Skywarn-NTS

Landshark[_2_] October 30th 08 02:00 AM

This Place is a Sewer
 

"jim" wrote in message
...


Landshark wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...

Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?





What's up OG???? LOL!!!!! Well you are right, but a good
filter doesn't hurt. It saw 89 post BBAAAAMMMMM, only
8 after filters. Going to see this collection tomorrow, wish you
& Steveo were closer, I know you two would like it.

http://www.milvehtechfound.com/history.html

Here's a good link with pictures:

http://www.mishalov.net/military-veh...-vehicles.html


Landshark

Nice site Sharkie. Thanks. I'm more particular to the air side of defense
as the family has been building planes since the '30's. Last plane was the
F14D Super Tomcat. Its retired now so I've moved on to state of the art
telecomm's.


No problem, love military air, just more towards WWII, not the modern, push
button stuff. That collection was awesome, it was amazing the stuff that guy
has.
I'll let you know when I'm out your way, visiting the Smithsonian. We'll
make a day or two for the Air & Space museum.

Landshark



[email protected] October 30th 08 09:44 PM

This Place is a Sewer
 
On Oct 29, 10:00*pm, "Landshark" wrote:
"jim" wrote in message

...







Landshark wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...


Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?


* What's up OG???? LOL!!!!! Well you are right, but a good
filter doesn't hurt. It saw 89 post BBAAAAMMMMM, only
8 after filters. Going to see this collection tomorrow, wish you
& Steveo were closer, I know you two would like it.


http://www.milvehtechfound.com/history.html


Here's a good link with pictures:


http://www.mishalov.net/military-veh...-vehicles.html


* *Landshark

Nice site Sharkie. Thanks. I'm more particular to the air side of defense
as the family has been building planes since the '30's. Last plane was the
F14D Super Tomcat. Its retired now so I've moved on to state of the art
telecomm's.


*No problem, love military air, just more towards WWII, not the modern, push
button stuff. That collection was awesome, it was amazing the stuff that guy
has.
* I'll let you know when I'm out your way, visiting the Smithsonian. We'll
make a day or two for the Air & Space museum.

* * Landshark- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


anothe keyclown dribbles squirrel turds...heh

jim November 1st 08 01:36 PM

This Place is a Sewer
 


Landshark wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...


Landshark wrote:

"jim" wrote in message
...


Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?





What's up OG???? LOL!!!!! Well you are right, but a good
filter doesn't hurt. It saw 89 post BBAAAAMMMMM, only
8 after filters. Going to see this collection tomorrow, wish you
& Steveo were closer, I know you two would like it.

http://www.milvehtechfound.com/history.html

Here's a good link with pictures:

http://www.mishalov.net/military-veh...-vehicles.html


Landshark


Nice site Sharkie. Thanks. I'm more particular to the air side of defense
as the family has been building planes since the '30's. Last plane was the
F14D Super Tomcat. Its retired now so I've moved on to state of the art
telecomm's.



No problem, love military air, just more towards WWII, not the modern, push
button stuff. That collection was awesome, it was amazing the stuff that guy
has.
I'll let you know when I'm out your way, visiting the Smithsonian. We'll
make a day or two for the Air & Space museum.

Landshark


I belong to the A&S org. Great museum there.


[email protected] November 6th 08 01:53 PM

This Place is a Sewer
 
On Nov 1, 8:36*am, jim wrote:
Landshark wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...


Landshark wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
...


Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?


*What's up OG???? LOL!!!!! Well you are right, but a good
filter doesn't hurt. It saw 89 post BBAAAAMMMMM, only
8 after filters. Going to see this collection tomorrow, wish you
& Steveo were closer, I know you two would like it.


http://www.milvehtechfound.com/history.html


Here's a good link with pictures:


http://www.mishalov.net/military-veh...-vehicles.html


* Landshark


Nice site Sharkie. Thanks. I'm more particular to the air side of defense
as the family has been building planes since the '30's. Last plane was the
F14D Super Tomcat. Its retired now so I've moved on to state of the art
telecomm's.


*No problem, love military air, just more towards WWII, not the modern, push
button stuff. That collection was awesome, it was amazing the stuff that guy
has.
* I'll let you know when I'm out your way, visiting the Smithsonian. We'll
make a day or two for the Air & Space museum.


* * Landshark


I belong to the A&S org. *Great museum there.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


A&S...heheh...anal and sucking...I get it!

Batch Search Summary
SEARCH ID SEARCH CRITERIA IDENTIFIER STATUS
3930206 Chapman,Randall CCH/NBF/SOR [9 results.] VIEW DETAILS


RESULTS FOR 'CHAPMAN,RANDALL '
Search ID 3930206 Back to Top
NAME DPS NUMBER SEX RACE DATE OF BIRTH CCH SOR NBF
CHAPMAN,RANDOLPH WILLARD 05388013 MALE WHITE 03/22/1961 VIEW


CHAPMAN,RANDOLPH WILLARD (SID: 05388013)
SEX RACE ETHNICITY HEIGHT WEIGHT EYES HAIR COLOR DL NUMBER FBI# DLU
MALE WHITE 508 195 BROWN Brown 10/26/1995
NAMES CHAPMAN,RANDOLPH WILLARD (Primary)
CHAPMAN,RANDY

BIRTHDATES 03/22/1961 (Primary)


Arrest Summary (TRN)
DATE OF ARREST SEQUENCE CODE TRACKING NUMBER AGENCY DESCRIPTION
01/16/1995 A 0007369727 TEXAS CITY PD View


Arrest Date: 01/16/1995 Arrest Summary


DATE OF ARREST 01/16/1995
SEQUENCE CODE A
TRACKING NUMBER 0007369727
AGENCY DESCRIPTION TX0840900 ( TEXAS CITY PD )
CHARGE
TRACKING SUFFIX A001
OFFENSE DETAIL
INTERNAL AGENCY PERSON NUMBER 020130
INTERNAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER 95633
ARREST OFFENSE 35990014 ( POSS CS PG 1 1G )
ARREST OFFENSE CITATION 481.115(b)
LEVEL AND DEGREE OF OFFENSE FS ( FELONY - STATE JAIL FELONY )
DATE OF OFFENSE 01/16/1995
ARREST DISPOSITION 205 ( HELD )
ARREST DISPOSITION DATE 01/16/1995
PROSECUTOR ORI REFERRED TO TX084015A ( DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
GALVESTON )
PROSECUTION DETAIL
AGENCY DESCRIPTION TX084015A ( DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
GALVESTON )
PROSECUTOR ACTION FIELD A ( PROSECUTOR ACCEPTS THE CHARGE )
PROSECUTOR OFFENSE 35990014 ( POSS CS PG 1 1G )
PROSECUTOR OFFENSE CITATION 481.115(b)
LEVEL AND DEGREE PROSECUTED FS ( FELONY - STATE JAIL FELONY )
COURT STATUS
COURT SEQUENCE a
AGENCY DESCRIPTION TX084035J ( 122ND DISTRICT COURT GALVESTON )
COURT OFFENSE 35990014 ( POSS CS PG 1 1G )
CITATION 481.115(b)
LEVEL AND DEGREE OFFENSE FS ( FELONY - STATE JAIL FELONY )
COURT DISPOSITION 312 ( DEFERRED )
COURT DISPOSITION DATE 09/21/1995
DATE OF SENTENCE/STATUS 09/21/1995
CAUSE NUMBER 95CR0800
FINAL PLEADING G ( GUILTY )
COURT PROBATION 4Y
COURT FINE 200
COURT COSTS 157
AGENCY RECEIVING CUSTODY GCCSCD



[email protected] November 6th 08 01:54 PM

This Place is a Sewer
 
On Oct 28, 10:04*am, Jay in the Mojave wrote:
Hello Jim:

Yeah 18 feet seems top work well in a mobile installation. Why is that?

Is it because the antenna puts RF Energy on the coax outer shield due to
a lack of ground surface. In all my antennas installs it seems that way.

So 18 feet of coax is roughly 3/4 of a wavelength, ( with a velocity
factory of .66) and any RF Energy coming back will have to come back
thru another 3/4 wavelength of coax.

Maybe that length vs wavelength is the best to use. Your comments....

Jay in the Mojave

jim wrote:

* Feed length 'does' make a difference



when calculating swr ;)- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


idiot


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com