LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old September 16th 03, 10:19 PM
Dave VanHorn
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"'Doc" wrote in message ...


Dave,
----snipped--------
passive dosen't mean 'no current flow' in this context, it means not

driven
from the feedline.


And the 'passive' element of a dipole antenna ~isn't~ fed
from the feed line? Confusing'er and confusing'er.


i've been maintaining that a properly implemented dipole does not have a
passive element.
both halves should be driven. in the case where it's fed directly with
coax, it isn't clear to me wether the shield connected element is getting
current from the inside of the shield, or by illumination from the center
connected element. i suspect both are true, to some degree.
certainly the rf on the feedline now couples into the system, and makes
things even fuzzier.

I thought both 'halves' of a dipole were fed by the feed line, certainly
every one that I've made, or seen have been.


No, I'm aware of that. But are you the one who 'minted' the
"two signal" way of looking at a single signal? Like some other
types of esoteric thinking you have to be very careful where
they
are applied, and how.


i wasn't as clear as i intended to be.
you can view the output of a balun as two out of phase signals, at half the
input power, or a single balanced signal. i wasn't sure if the fellow i was
talking to at that point, knew what you get at the output of a balun.

If you aren't careful, they deteriorate
into nonsense as has happened here. If how you think about a
dipole antenna helps you with what you're doing, then fine, have
at it. That doesn't make it 'correct' or the 'right' way of
doing
things, though, and it is very confusing to someone who isn't
familiar with that particular 'theory' of operation. If you
want to
call a dipole by another name, that's fine too. But it don't
make
it so.


no, the point i was making is that a dipole, is designed to be fed from a
balanced source, and it does make a difference. the magnitude of the
difference, in gain, radiation, and rf on the feedline /when feeding it
unbalanced/ is debatable.

Aunt Martha wasn't born with wheels, so she really isn't
a Buick... no matter what she thinks.
'Doc


beep beep /vbg/


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Yaesu FT-857D questions Joe S. Equipment 6 October 25th 04 09:40 AM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 04:08 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017