On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 04:22:34 -0600, 'Doc wrote:



tnom,
Except to 'stir the pot' why would you want to drag
out this collection of out dated misconcepts? Mixing
a little bit of truth with a lot of old 'wive's tales'
is a sure way to spread confusion and mis-information.
In that respect you're doing a fine job...
'Doc
Well, I guess I could of stayed with the standard material for
this group. The pedophilia stories, the name calling, the hobby
bashing negative dribble, But I chose different. I chose to
stay constructive and on topic.

I'm sorry you can't see that. The original message by me was to
point out that there are 5 foot antennas that will perform very good.



This was disputed, so I offered proof by posting the test.
I also offered a possible explanation of why a 102"SS
can be beat. You have the right to not believe that a 102
can't be beat but it is ridiculous for you to suggest that these
discussions are not what this group is suppose to be about.

There has been no name calling, no pede comments, no
gay comments, or anti CB rhetoric. What are you complaining
about?

You must of been so used to the former that you were caught off
guard when a real discussion came up. Remember that if everyone agrees
then there is no discussion.