Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree to all of the above except a 1/4 wave is a 1/4 no matter what. A so
called loaded 1/4 is a loaded antenna not called a 1/4 anymore. Once a antenna has been shortened by any means, shorter than the physical 1/4 wave antenna ( 1/4 wave including the velocity factor ), top hats, loading coil, or ant other ways it is not clamed to be called a 1/4 wave anymore. I did say 1/4 whip on the post, as most everybody should have known it to be the 108" antenna. "'Doc" wrote in message ... BuckEye wrote: As we all know under Idea conductions a 1/4 wave whip will out do any loaded antenna. Nope, sorry, that just isn't true. If you would have said that a full length 1/4 wave antenna will out perform a shortened 1/4 wave antenna, you'd have been right. But if the full length and shortened antennas are of different 'electrical' lengths, then all bets are off. I do agree with the rest of your post. A shortened antenna is much more -practical- to use and a lot easier to live with... 'Doc |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doppler DF whip length | Antenna | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Hygain 18AVT/WB Parts Traps, 80m coil whip etc. | Antenna |