Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jerry Oxendine wrote: "joseph mcdavid" wrote in message ... jim wrote: wrote: "Twistedhed" wrote in message ... Organized, long term freebanders are very aware where they operate and take great measure to ensure against talking on an amateur f requency or one that isn't heavily used on the freeband. If the non-U.S. stations can operate ssb there, why shouldn't I, especially if I want to have a nice DX contact with one of them? I've been a so-called "freebander" since the late sixties but rarely for DX. The primary reason I talked outside of allotted frequencies was for privacy or to contact a specific distant station I wouldn't normally hear on the allotted band. We used to run Ch. 16 -5khz down and 15A a RC Channel running slightly above stock power on 3-4 element directional and easily talk 75-100 miles. I spoke all over the world with better than 1000 confirmed QSL contacts from a slightly peaked Golden Eagle Mark III/IV running through a 4 beam element at 60 feet from Central NJ. actually a good point. if i were to use the freq's the u.s. gov said i can then what is the problem with slipping +/- 5kc's between 'channels'? is that freebanding? better yet, who the hell is the u.s. gov to tell me what is legal or not? if i were to float out to bermuda and xmit would i be freebanding there? do our friends to the north and south really care what the fcc says what americans can/cannot do? not likely.... Quick comment to Jim from above: Actually, they just might. Treaties are sometimes used as bargaining chips. If a problem arises such as radio interference, then an aggrieved country can take it up with the offending country. Where the US is concerned, it may be that a country that needs loans, etc. will agree to abate the RFI in exchange for said loans, grants, or other concessions. And of course, it can be taken up with ITU. jerry you may be right with the treaties as I am not up on international law. point is if there are such agreements has anyone ever been prosecuted by their governing bodies or hell have any nations been notified by another that one of their citizens is causing harm? I dont know the answers but at this point it still won't stop people freebanding. Its human nature to nonconform especially concerning something as trivial as this. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Re Freeband DX, Why Don't Hams Mind Their Own Business? | Policy | |||
Persecution of Honest Freeband DXers | CB | |||
Persecution of Honest Freeband DXers | Policy |