Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Naw, it was a troll. Might as well keep it up as this newsgroup doesn't
seem to change too much anyways. Seriously, I don't know what the fascination is with these multiple kilowatt levels. I doubt many people are running more than a couple of hundred watts, despite what the numbers show on the boxes that are being sold these days (and most of those watts are likely nowhere near where one wants them to be effective). I try not to think too much within these groups; however, neither Twist nor I (which makes two) think too slowly. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim wrote in message ... On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:56:34 GMT, "Jim Hampton" wrote: Twist, I'd ask you to explain to the gentleman that you won't be adding 'taps' to inductors; you'll need more inductance, not more taps. But then, I'd be asking you to lower yourself to his level. I don't think you are capable of thinking that slowly. ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim He said " has components to cover 160 with some addl inductor taps" That means he has a large enough inductor with a unused section that includes taps that will increase the inductance for 160 . Who's thinking to slowly? |