|
New song about twathed
Don't blame the AKC...this was anonymously sent to some email
addresses yesterday. Of course, we can't resist posting it here because it is sooo funny and soooo accurate. HARDEEEHARRHARRHARR, LIFE IS GOOD WHEN YOU AINT A SISSY NAMED TWISTEDHED!!!! TO THE TUNE OF THE 1972 HIT "CANDYMAN" Who can take a hard dick Suck out all the goo Stuff his nose up a butt crack And rim it real good too Twistedhed Oh Twistedhed does Twistedhed does cuz he mixes jizz with spit And thinks it tastes real good Who can bend it over And beg for throbbing dick And when he's finished gettin' pumped Turn around and lick a prick Twistedhed Oh Twistedhed does Twistedhed does cuz he mixes jizz with spit And thinks it tastes real good Twistedhed thinks Faggot keyclown twinks Are satisfiyng and delicious Talk about his childhood wishes He really blows those faggot bitches Who can hit a truckstop Announce that he'll be reamed Collect ten bucks a trucker And then suck up all the cream Twistedhed Twistedhed does Twistedhed does cuz he mixes jizz with spit And thinks it tastes real good Twistedhed thinks Faggot keyclown twinks Are satisfiyng and delicious Talk about his childhood wishes He really blows those faggot bitches Sorry Sammy...we could not resist... |
|
In , wrote:
snip The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 03:58:42 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote: In , wrote: snip The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? Oh, I sorry. I didn't want to step on your toes. I'll refer to you the next time |
Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , wrote: snip The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? Think it requires a degree to realize he's flooding this board with homo **** again? |
In , Steveo
wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , wrote: snip The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? Think it requires a degree to realize he's flooding this board with homo **** again? He only posts that crap because you and a few others keep responding to it. Ever read anything about Pavlov? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Steveo wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , wrote: snip The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? Think it requires a degree to realize he's flooding this board with homo **** again? He only posts that crap because you and a few others keep responding to it. Ever read anything about Pavlov? No, but I'm sure it's relative. Dude's sick in the dome. |
The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? Oh, I sorry. I didn't want to step on your toes. I'll refer to you the next time How were you stepping on my toes? You seemed to have a problem with me stating the obvious about DouGay. Therefore I assumed you were jealous of my response because you wanted to come out with an explanation before I did. If that's not the reason for you questioning the accuracy of my response then what is? Are you saying DouGay post is a normal post from a normal person? |
He only posts that crap because you and a few others keep responding to it. Ever read anything about Pavlov? "And just how did you become an expert on the psychology......................." |
|
In , wrote:
The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? Oh, I sorry. I didn't want to step on your toes. I'll refer to you the next time How were you stepping on my toes? You seemed to have a problem with me stating the obvious about DouGay. Therefore I assumed you were jealous of my response because you wanted to come out with an explanation before I did. If that's not the reason for you questioning the accuracy of my response then what is? Are you saying DouGay post is a normal post from a normal person? I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he always talks about the subject. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or research that supports your argument? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , wrote: The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? Oh, I sorry. I didn't want to step on your toes. I'll refer to you the next time How were you stepping on my toes? You seemed to have a problem with me stating the obvious about DouGay. Therefore I assumed you were jealous of my response because you wanted to come out with an explanation before I did. If that's not the reason for you questioning the accuracy of my response then what is? Are you saying DouGay post is a normal post from a normal person? I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he always talks about the subject. LOL....yes. See, you can learn when forced. Hold on tight,,I'm about to fill your skullcap. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or research that supports your argument? -----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----=3D=3D Yes. Freud. He compared it to ice cream. A slow, learning impaired child with a subpar IQ who loves ice cream, may take to involuntary insertion and mentioning "ice cream" in parts of their speech where it most certainly doesn't fit and makes no sense. Freud claimed the same flawed behavioral "tick" is responsible for the sexually deranged and obsessed.....that involuntary sexual speech, most notable homophobic/homosexual, and sex as relates to a mother figure, is the subjects most innate desire. This information is available to anyone who wishes to take the time and do a casual search of Freud and his works relating to the sexual and biological conditioning of prepubescents and how they digress (get worse over time). In other words, Freud holds that such sicknesses are incurable and get worse, not better with time as some believe. |
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , wrote: The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his own perverted wishes. And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality? Oh, I sorry. I didn't want to step on your toes. I'll refer to you the next time How were you stepping on my toes? You seemed to have a problem with me stating the obvious about DouGay. Therefore I assumed you were jealous of my response because you wanted to come out with an explanation before I did. If that's not the reason for you questioning the accuracy of my response then what is? Are you saying DouGay post is a normal post from a normal person? I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he always talks about the subject. LOL....yes. See, you can learn when forced. Hold on tight,,I'm about to fill your skullcap. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or research that supports your argument? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Yes. Freud. He compared it to ice cream. A slow, learning impaired child with a subpar IQ who loves ice cream, may take to involuntary insertion and mentioning "ice cream" in parts of their speech where it most certainly doesn't fit and makes no sense. Freud claimed the same flawed behavioral "tick" is responsible for the sexually deranged and obsessed.....that involuntary sexual speech, most notable homophobic/homosexual, and sex as relates to a mother figure, is the subjects most innate desire. This information is available to anyone who wishes to take the time and do a casual search of Freud and his works relating to the sexual and biological conditioning of prepubescents and how they digress (get worse over time). In other words, Freud holds that such sicknesses are incurable and get worse, not better with time as some believe. Freud was a nutcase and so are you, Dave. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he always talks about the subject. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or research that supports your argument? Are you blind? Have you not seen his preoccupation with child pornographic symbolism. His preoccupation with.gay remarks and innuendo.? Yes there is precedent. Open your psychology 101 book and start reading. |
In , wrote:
I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he always talks about the subject. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or research that supports your argument? Are you blind? Have you not seen his preoccupation with child pornographic symbolism. His preoccupation with.gay remarks and innuendo.? Yes there is precedent. Open your psychology 101 book and start reading. I took the course. To which concept are you referring? I don't think it's there, Tnom. I think you are looking for a reason beyond the obvious -- he's just trying to offend you. And the fact that he drew you into the flame-fest is proof that he suceeded. Now you have to decide whether or not you are going to remain in a flame-war filled with child-porn and homosexuality, and if you do, doesn't that give others the perception that you are no worse than him? Think about it. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , wrote: I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he always talks about the subject. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or research that supports your argument? Are you blind? Have you not seen his preoccupation with child pornographic symbolism. His preoccupation with.gay remarks and innuendo.? Yes there is precedent. Open your psychology 101 book and start reading. I took the course. Oh aman,,,here we go again. Only since you feel it pertinent,,,,,where did you take such a course? LOL! To which concept are you referring? You can't even accept one of the the world's most widely accepted author, scholar, and theorist in the field of psychology. Once again, you make certain what you speak of has no merit. I don't think it's there, Tnom. Something else you can't find on gooogle? LMAO! I think you are looking Your thoughts are for our entertainment only. Please confine them to such. for a reason beyond the obvious -- he's just trying to offend you. And the fact that he drew you into the flame-fest is proof that he suceeded. Now you have to decide whether or not you are going to remain in a flame-war filled with child-porn We are NOT speaking of Dave Hall at this point in time. Of course, if you wish to persue.... and homosexuality, and if you do, doesn't that give others the perception that you are no worse than him? Think about it. LOL....as always, the majority of others don't give a damn to the extent you do of what others think. This unhealthy trait is inherent to the loser lids of the group, aptly named by Arron Voobner: KC8LDO, N3CVC, N7VCF, N8WWM, WA3MOJ. Thank you Mr. "Voobner" (never thought I'd say that). Keepin with what others "think" it has been your professed wish that a certain element be ignored and go away. This illustrtates your need for "wannabe" moderator status, something you strive for but fall way short of,,the need to be obeyed,,the need to tell others what to do., just like when you impotently begged for followers into the "new" group you failed to start. I'll tell you what one thinks, since I share the average cber mindset much more than you ever can hope......we think that by NOT ignoring the abuse, loser clones like yourself will continue to be chased from ISP to ISP for your inability to adhere to the rules in place to benefit all. By doing what you ask, ignoring the abuse, the abusers are given free reign and a safe haven. Won't happen while I draw breath. Begging me to leave has you coming unglued at the seams and not practicing what you hypocritically preach to others. You need a life....LOL, as you fail miserably at attempts to live vicariously through mine...LOL! -----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----=3D=3D |
I took the course. To which concept are you referring? I don't think it's there, Tnom. I think you are looking for a reason beyond the obvious -- he's just trying to offend you. No. the fact that you seem to find more problems with my reply than his post shows you are sympathetic towards his leanings. (pedophilia, homosexuality ect.) For all we know you may be DouGays love partner And the fact that he drew you into the flame-fest is proof that he suceeded. Now you have to decide whether or not you are going to remain in a flame-war filled with child-porn and homosexuality, and if you do, doesn't that give others the perception that you are no worse than him? Think about it. You are a hypocrite. You have drawn yourself into this thread yet my legitimate response is somehow not as worthy as yours? Like I said before. Your sympathy toward posters authoring stories on pedophilia and homosexuality is showing. |
In , wrote:
I took the course. To which concept are you referring? I don't think it's there, Tnom. I think you are looking for a reason beyond the obvious -- he's just trying to offend you. No. the fact that you seem to find more problems with my reply than his post shows you are sympathetic towards his leanings. (pedophilia, homosexuality ect.) For all we know you may be DouGays love partner And the fact that he drew you into the flame-fest is proof that he suceeded. Now you have to decide whether or not you are going to remain in a flame-war filled with child-porn and homosexuality, and if you do, doesn't that give others the perception that you are no worse than him? Think about it. You are a hypocrite. You have drawn yourself into this thread yet my legitimate response is somehow not as worthy as yours? Like I said before. Your sympathy toward posters authoring stories on pedophilia and homosexuality is showing. And I thought there was hope. Guess not. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Like I said before. Your sympathy toward posters authoring stories on pedophilia and homosexuality is showing. And I thought there was hope. Guess not. No. It is common knowledge that once a pedophile, always a pedophile. In your case, once a sympathizer always a sympathizer. |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:44:44 -0600, William Wallace
wrote: wrote in : Like I said before. Your sympathy toward posters authoring stories on pedophilia and homosexuality is showing. And I thought there was hope. Guess not. No. It is common knowledge that once a pedophile, always a pedophile. In your case, once a sympathizer always a sympathizer. In your case Tnom Once an asshole always and asshole. Yes. When it concerns you and your fellow obsessive junior police nerd brothers I can, and will be an asshole toward you. |
Twistedhed slurps mens penises and eats sperm from any species available
Who can take a hard dick Suck out all the goo Stuff his nose up a butt crack And rim it real good too Twistedhed Oh Twistedhed does Twistedhed does cuz he mixes jizz with spit And thinks it tastes real good Who can bend it over And beg for throbbing dick And when he's finished gettin' pumped Turn around and lick a prick Twistedhed Oh Twistedhed does Twistedhed does cuz he mixes jizz with spit And thinks it tastes real good Twistedhed thinks Faggot keyclown twinks Are satisfiyng and delicious Talk about his childhood wishes He really blows those faggot bitches Who can hit a truckstop Announce that he'll be reamed Collect ten bucks a trucker And then suck up all the cream Twistedhed Twistedhed does Twistedhed does cuz he mixes jizz with spit And thinks it tastes real good Twistedhed thinks Faggot keyclown twinks Are satisfiyng and delicious Talk about his childhood wishes He really blows those faggot bitches Sorry Sammy...we could not resist... wrote in message . .. He only posts that crap because you and a few others keep responding to it. Ever read anything about Pavlov? "And just how did you become an expert on the psychology......................." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com