|
In article , William Wallace says...
Frank Gilliland wrote in : In , wrote: On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 20:14:59 -0800, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , wrote: snip I haven't given up on you yet, Tnom: You should. You are looking more and more like a fool. Time for you to fold. Why should -I- fold? You can't address the facts even when they are presented in a form that -you- can understand! Do you need Dr. Seuss to explain it to you? Easy Frank, your making this guy look like a real jackass, besides he is a cber and they have all those cb myths to follow. ZOLTAN say If we took the collective stupidity of every low-life imbecile known since the evolution of man, it might be close to the complete lack of brain function you posess . |
Math, Tnom. Where's the math, you worthless pile of troll dung? Common sense. where's your common sense? "you worthless pile of troll dung" |
Evidently, he's one of those guys who believes in running the compression up to the point where a mouse fart in the next room will move the power meter, and average voice peaks disappear into an almost carrier steady power which rarely drops below 75% of peak...... In that case, the amp will be drawing more power that a capacitor can make up for. Dave "Sandbagger" Even though you don't know it, you are agreeing with me. Take a listen to SSB voice on any amateur band or CB if you like. The preferred SSB signal is one which enhances its intelligibility. This is done with some sort of compression which will be a point in between your example and no compression at all. Recovery time is reduced with compression, and simply put the $50 spent on a capacitor can be better spent. |
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:49:20 GMT, "MasterCBer"
wrote: Simple test, Put a scope across the DC supply lines next to the Amp, Look at the audio effect on the voltage ( SSB mode ), Next hook up a Cap as discussed, Now look at the audio ripple, if I need to tell HOW to hook up the scope, then you don't need to brother with this. Simple enough. Wait just a minute. If the radio at the receiving end of this 1 faraded dx1600's signal can't tell the difference then why the heck would any one spend $50? Simple enough? |
I could care less about what the receiver could see, sure I would spend $50
bucks to help keep the audio waveform from ridding along my electrical system, and help the amp out also. I also do not run compression on my radio,and it sounds good. ( Must be the cap ) Ha Ha. Like they say, Don't knock it until you try it, you might look like a fool. wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:49:20 GMT, "MasterCBer" wrote: Simple test, Put a scope across the DC supply lines next to the Amp, Look at the audio effect on the voltage ( SSB mode ), Next hook up a Cap as discussed, Now look at the audio ripple, if I need to tell HOW to hook up the scope, then you don't need to brother with this. Simple enough. Wait just a minute. If the radio at the receiving end of this 1 faraded dx1600's signal can't tell the difference then why the heck would any one spend $50? Simple enough? |
In , wrote:
Math, Tnom. Where's the math, you worthless pile of troll dung? Common sense. where's your common sense? "you worthless pile of troll dung" "Common sense" is not "fact", nor is it objective. You were whining about facts earlier. Where are your facts? Where's the math, Tnom? ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
snip
"you worthless pile of troll dung" "Common sense" is not "fact", nor is it objective. You were whining about facts earlier. Where are your facts? I already stated the facts. I'll quote it again. "you worthless pile of troll dung" |
And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back up your bull****. Got math? You want math...........Troll + Fiction = Frank |
In , wrote:
And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back up your bull****. Got math? You want math...........Troll + Fiction = Frank Oh, I get it. You want the last word, as if that will somehow substantiate your claims in the absence of facts. Go for it, Tnom. ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com