In article , William Wallace says...

Frank Gilliland wrote in
:

In , wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 20:14:59 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In ,
wrote:

snip


I haven't given up on you yet, Tnom:

You should. You are looking more and more like a fool. Time for you to
fold.

Why should -I- fold? You can't address the facts even when they are
presented in a form that -you- can understand! Do you need Dr. Seuss
to explain it to you?



Easy Frank, your making this guy look like a real jackass, besides he is a
cber and they have all those cb myths to follow.

ZOLTAN say If we took the collective stupidity of every low-life imbecile known
since the evolution of man, it might be close to the complete lack of brain
function you posess .

Math, Tnom. Where's the math, you worthless pile of troll dung?


Common sense. where's your common sense?

"you worthless pile of troll dung"

Evidently, he's one of those guys who believes in running the
compression up to the point where a mouse fart in the next room will
move the power meter, and average voice peaks disappear into an almost
carrier steady power which rarely drops below 75% of peak......

In that case, the amp will be drawing more power that a capacitor can
make up for.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

Even though you don't know it, you are agreeing with me.
Take a listen to SSB voice on any amateur band or CB if
you like. The preferred SSB signal is one which enhances its
intelligibility. This is done with some sort of compression which
will be a point in between your example and no compression at
all.

Recovery time is reduced with compression, and simply put the $50
spent on a capacitor can be better spent.

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:49:20 GMT, "MasterCBer"
wrote:

Simple test, Put a scope across the DC supply lines next to the Amp, Look at
the audio effect on the voltage ( SSB mode ), Next hook up a Cap as
discussed, Now look at the audio ripple, if I need to tell HOW to hook up
the scope, then you don't need to brother with this.
Simple enough.

Wait just a minute. If the radio at the receiving end of this 1
faraded dx1600's signal can't tell the difference then why the
heck would any one spend $50?

Simple enough?

I could care less about what the receiver could see, sure I would spend $50
bucks to help keep the audio waveform from ridding along my electrical
system, and help the amp out also. I also do not run compression on my
radio,and it sounds good. ( Must be the cap ) Ha Ha.
Like they say,

Don't knock it until you try it, you might look like a fool.



wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:49:20 GMT, "MasterCBer"
wrote:

Simple test, Put a scope across the DC supply lines next to the Amp, Look
at
the audio effect on the voltage ( SSB mode ), Next hook up a Cap as
discussed, Now look at the audio ripple, if I need to tell HOW to hook up
the scope, then you don't need to brother with this.
Simple enough.

Wait just a minute. If the radio at the receiving end of this 1
faraded dx1600's signal can't tell the difference then why the
heck would any one spend $50?

Simple enough?

In , wrote:



Math, Tnom. Where's the math, you worthless pile of troll dung?


Common sense. where's your common sense?

"you worthless pile of troll dung"


"Common sense" is not "fact", nor is it objective. You were whining about facts
earlier. Where are your facts? Where's the math, Tnom?







=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

snip
"you worthless pile of troll dung"


"Common sense" is not "fact", nor is it objective. You were whining about facts
earlier. Where are your facts?


I already stated the facts. I'll quote it again.

"you worthless pile of troll dung"

In , wrote:

snip
"you worthless pile of troll dung"


"Common sense" is not "fact", nor is it objective. You were whining about facts
earlier. Where are your facts?


I already stated the facts. I'll quote it again.

"you worthless pile of troll dung"

And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back
up your bull****. Got math?






=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back
up your bull****. Got math?

You want math...........Troll + Fiction = Frank

In , wrote:


And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back
up your bull****. Got math?

You want math...........Troll + Fiction = Frank


Oh, I get it. You want the last word, as if that will somehow substantiate your
claims in the absence of facts. Go for it, Tnom.






=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----