In , "Jerry Oxendine"
wrote:

snip
......... We
will see if FCC "ignores" anything. Or not.

WADR, the FCC "ignores" the Citizen's Band, which is the origin of the vast
majority of the 10m "incursions". Riley & Co. refuse to go after the problem at
it's source; which, btw, has the very same problem but is not complained about
by hams. Hams don't have any more rights than CBers, yet the FCC chooses to
enforce the ham bands and not the CB. To the FCC, CBers are second-class
citizens. Ask Riley to prove any different.









-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"Landshark" wrote in message
. ..

"Jerry Oxendine" wrote in message
...

Jerry


Hey Jerry, all the BS aside, how you been
doing since you're heart problem?

Landshark

I am doing great! I have no restrictions, and no particular diet. I just
watch what I eat and try not to overdo anything. Tnx for asking.

Jerry


--
Hard things are put in our way,
not to stop us, but to call out our
courage and strength.

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
In , "Jerry Oxendine"
wrote:

snip
......... We
will see if FCC "ignores" anything. Or not.

WADR, the FCC "ignores" the Citizen's Band, which is the origin of the
vast
majority of the 10m "incursions". Riley & Co. refuse to go after the
problem at
it's source; which, btw, has the very same problem but is not complained
about
by hams. Hams don't have any more rights than CBers, yet the FCC chooses
to
enforce the ham bands and not the CB. To the FCC, CBers are second-class
citizens. Ask Riley to prove any different.

Just wait and see...........................................!!

Jerry











-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

JerrO wrote:
We

will see if FCC "ignores" anything. Or not.

Jerry



As of January 1, 2004, the FCC is ignoring anonymous complaints relating
to cb or hammie radio, lodged by individuals against another individual.

In , "Jerry Oxendine"
wrote:


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
.. .
In , "Jerry Oxendine"
wrote:

snip
......... We
will see if FCC "ignores" anything. Or not.

WADR, the FCC "ignores" the Citizen's Band, which is the origin of the
vast
majority of the 10m "incursions". Riley & Co. refuse to go after the
problem at
it's source; which, btw, has the very same problem but is not complained
about
by hams. Hams don't have any more rights than CBers, yet the FCC chooses
to
enforce the ham bands and not the CB. To the FCC, CBers are second-class
citizens. Ask Riley to prove any different.

Just wait and see...........................................!!

Jerry


This is what you said four years ago......

From: Jerry Oxendine )
Subject: QSL
View: Complete Thread (35 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
Date: 2000/04/23

snip
...... in talking with Riley in
person, he is VERY interested in the freebanding issue, and unless he
is telling me wrong, this will be addressed soon in a much bigger way....











-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

No. they have merely changed the way such is reported.
Instead of reporting the full name of the accused, they only give the name
of the location, callsign, and the infraction. Otherwise, they still
respond to complaints.

Jerry
"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
JerrO wrote:
We

will see if FCC "ignores" anything. Or not.

Jerry



As of January 1, 2004, the FCC is ignoring anonymous complaints relating
to cb or hammie radio, lodged by individuals against another individual.

From: (Jerry=A0Oxendine)
No. they have merely changed the way such

is reported.


Exactly,,they no longer follow up anonymous reported complaints.


Instead of reporting the full name

of the accused, they only give the name of the
location, callsign, and the infraction.

Otherwise, they still respond to complaints.

Jerry



What I am speaking of has nothing to do with the manner in which the FCC
releases its information to the public.

"Jerry Oxendine" wrote:
No. they have merely changed the way such is reported.
Instead of reporting the full name of the accused, they only give the
name of the location, callsign, and the infraction. Otherwise, they
still respond to complaints.

They'll have to jump fences to catch me. Tell Riley to eat me.

Hi Jer. ;)

Frank Gilliland wrote:
This is what you said four years ago......

Archive boy. Who does that remind me of?

Steveo wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
This is what you said four years ago......

Archive boy. Who does that remind me of?

Remember this idle threat?

My only plan (right now) is to take his
picture through the scope of my best rifle. There is so much
satisfaction in knowing what I -could- do but don't. Like I said, I
have an interesting photo album.

I'll beat you like a red headed step child.