|
Impotent Mark wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote in om: Hey dip**** you have been chasing "george" with every one of your posts for years, you "mention" george every day of your life. I am not george and the guy at comcast isnt either so now what LOL go shove a cactus tree up your ass STFU and quit your harassment of this news group. Cc. to abuse@your gay ass http://www.geocities.com/iamnotgeorge2004/ You know what isn't that the goddamn truth Damn straight |
|
Lancer wrote:
On 28 Jan 2004 08:06:51 -0800, (I Am George) wrote: The pic is still for personal use. Just because I took the test so what, butt****. LOL! you are to funny George, drunk already this early in the morning? I am not George and I have proved that to you but go on calling me that if you want, you must be drunk on the fumes from Landsharks ass to be humping my leg this early. |
Impotent Shark wrote in message ...
Read this part assclown, for personal use... LOL you are so damn impotent. Quoted Text "Copyright © 2004 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose other than personal use. Therefore, reproduction, modification, storage in a retrieval system or retransmission, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, for reasons other than personal use, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission." Public display is not considered "personal use". Once you display something publically, the "personal use" rule is useless to you... and you are open to prosecution under copyright laws, which also cover public display or performance of copyright material. Before you go wild, I am just making you aware of the law... as I have done with CB laws where someone really wanted to know. Whether you take notice of that law is up to you, but at least you are fully aware of the situation. If they come after you, you cannot say that nobody warned you. But remember, if you don't care about stealing copyright material, then don't lecture people about stealing frequencies. |
"Braìnbuster" wrote:
Impotent Shark wrote in message ... Read this part assclown, for personal use... LOL you are so damn impotent. Quoted Text "Copyright © 2004 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose other than personal use. Therefore, reproduction, modification, storage in a retrieval system or retransmission, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, for reasons other than personal use, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission." Public display is not considered "personal use". Once you display something publically, the "personal use" rule is useless to you... and you are open to prosecution under copyright laws, which also cover public display or performance of copyright material. Before you go wild, I am just making you aware of the law... as I have done with CB laws where someone really wanted to know. Whether you take notice of that law is up to you, but at least you are fully aware of the situation. If they come after you, you cannot say that nobody warned you. But remember, if you don't care about stealing copyright material, then don't lecture people about stealing frequencies. You might as well be talking to the wall. |
"Braìnbuster" wrote in message ...
But remember, if you don't care about stealing copyright material, then don't lecture people about stealing frequencies. why would you want to defend stealing frequencies? or do you mean just shut up and dont say anything about it because the people who do it feel bad if there called on it? |
I Am Not George wrote in message ...
"Braìnbuster" wrote in message ... But remember, if you don't care about stealing copyright material, then don't lecture people about stealing frequencies. why would you want to defend stealing frequencies? I have done no such thing, so maybe you should tell me why I should. What I do say is that a copyright thief is still a thief, and is in no position to whine about other people who he calls thieves. So, I am speaking out against theft... and you seem to be defending theft with excuses and diversions. The words "personal use" will not get you out of trouble if you get caught for public display of copyright material. As you are so keen on "ratting" on "criminals", are you going to rat on yourself, or wait until one of your victims decides to make you pay for your crimes. It just goes to show one thing - the "akc" are the criminals on this newsgroup, copyright theives and repeater jammers... anyone want to add to the list of crimes these so called "pro-legal" trolls are guilty of? |
Steveo wrote in message ...
"Braìnbuster" wrote: Before you go wild, I am just making you aware of the law... as I have done with CB laws where someone really wanted to know. Whether you take notice of that law is up to you, but at least you are fully aware of the situation. If they come after you, you cannot say that nobody warned you. But remember, if you don't care about stealing copyright material, then don't lecture people about stealing frequencies. You might as well be talking to the wall. The "akc" show themselves for what they are - criminals. While they are busy complaining about and "ratting out" illegal equipment, they are happily breaking laws themselves. When they are made aware of their illegal position, they divert attention. If we didn't know better, we would think that they had no respect for the law. Wait a minute... we don't know any better. I really would love to hear about them getting "ratted out" for their crimes - specially if it is done by one of their victims. With copyright theft, there may be no set "fine" to rely on... the victim of the crime will go for a figure they feel is right as compensation, then you can add legal costs to that. Regards. Peter. |
In , "Braìnbuster"
wrote: Steveo wrote in message ... "Braìnbuster" wrote: Before you go wild, I am just making you aware of the law... as I have done with CB laws where someone really wanted to know. Whether you take notice of that law is up to you, but at least you are fully aware of the situation. If they come after you, you cannot say that nobody warned you. But remember, if you don't care about stealing copyright material, then don't lecture people about stealing frequencies. You might as well be talking to the wall. The "akc" show themselves for what they are - criminals. While they are busy complaining about and "ratting out" illegal equipment, they are happily breaking laws themselves. What laws are they breaking? When they are made aware of their illegal position, they divert attention. If we didn't know better, we would think that they had no respect for the law. Wait a minute... we don't know any better. I really would love to hear about them getting "ratted out" for their crimes - specially if it is done by one of their victims. With copyright theft, there may be no set "fine" to rely on... the victim of the crime will go for a figure they feel is right as compensation, then you can add legal costs to that. Who in this newsgroup was victimized by "copyright theft", and by whom? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com