RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   CB (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/)
-   -   Jay's I-10k or Wolf's .64 antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/31481-jays-i-10k-wolfs-64-antenna.html)

Paul Bauer March 29th 04 09:58 PM

Jay's I-10k or Wolf's .64 antenna
 
anybody compare the 2 antennas?

here are links
http://www.wolfradio.com/p64.htm
and
http://www.a1antennas.com

looking for the best 5/8 or.64 wave omni available.



DJboutit March 29th 04 10:09 PM

I have chated with the maker on I-10ks on irc before and he told me that is
this the best cb antenann out. You get more gain than any other cb antenna
and get alot better receive & transmitt. I-10k is good if you are going to
us a good ammount of power put if you are going to use only like 4w then a
Imax is what you would want to get.



jim March 30th 04 01:32 AM



DJboutit wrote:
I have chated with the maker on I-10ks on irc before and he told me that is
this the best cb antenann out. You get more gain than any other cb antenna
and get alot better receive & transmitt. I-10k is good if you are going to
us a good ammount of power put if you are going to use only like 4w then a
Imax is what you would want to get.



can the maker back his statements up with specs?


MrTimNebo March 30th 04 05:03 PM

jay is the REAL deal.............




jim March 30th 04 08:04 PM



MrTimNebo wrote:
jay is the REAL deal.............



still like to see the specs.


Frank Gilliland March 30th 04 08:21 PM

In , jim wrote:



MrTimNebo wrote:
jay is the REAL deal.............



still like to see the specs.



You will probably never see them. He probably considers those specs to be
'marketing information' which he doesn't disclose, just like his source that
tells him there are 12 million CBers in the world.








-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

jim March 30th 04 08:29 PM



MrTimNebo wrote:
jay is the REAL deal.............



i went back and looked a little closer this time and saw what i was
looking for. you are right tim, jay is a respected poster to this board.
dont know where the 12 million cbers number came from but its irrelevant.


I Am Not George March 30th 04 09:32 PM

Frank what is your opinion of Jays i-10K antenna?

http://www.a1antennas.com/

Frank Gilliland March 31st 04 01:03 AM

In , jim wrote:



MrTimNebo wrote:
jay is the REAL deal.............



i went back and looked a little closer this time and saw what i was
looking for. you are right tim, jay is a respected poster to this board.
dont know where the 12 million cbers number came from but its irrelevant.



That number came from Jay, and it is very relevant because it is one of several
claims he has made, yet refuses to back up with facts under the excuse that they
are 'marketing secrets'. I'm can't say that his antennas are junk -- they might
be outstanding antennas, but since I have never seen or tested one I can't say
one way or the other. What I -can- say is that when it comes to marketing, Jay's
"facts" leave a lot to be desired.

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that depends on your
point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the keyclowns since he promotes
illegal operation. OTOH, he comes across with an attitude haughtier than my own,
even to the point of appointing himself as the newsgroup's polite-police. And I
won't even go into the technical discussions except to say that for a person who
purports himself to be knowledgable about radio and electronics, he lacks much
of the theory and experience one would expect such an 'expert' to have.

But I'm sure you have a different opinion.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Steveo March 31st 04 01:11 AM

Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I have never
seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What I -can- say is
that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts" leave a lot to be desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that depends on
your point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the keyclowns since
he promotes illegal operation.

Blah blah blah :)

Steveo March 31st 04 01:15 AM

jim wrote:
MrTimNebo wrote:
jay is the REAL deal.............



i went back and looked a little closer this time and saw what i was
looking for. you are right tim, jay is a respected poster to this board.
dont know where the 12 million cbers number came from but its irrelevant.

It's a shame Jay doesn't post here much anymore, hope he's ok.

Helloooooo Jay....

jim March 31st 04 01:42 AM



Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , jim wrote:



MrTimNebo wrote:

jay is the REAL deal.............




i went back and looked a little closer this time and saw what i was
looking for. you are right tim, jay is a respected poster to this board.
dont know where the 12 million cbers number came from but its irrelevant.




That number came from Jay, and it is very relevant because it is one of several
claims he has made, yet refuses to back up with facts under the excuse that they
are 'marketing secrets'. I'm can't say that his antennas are junk -- they might
be outstanding antennas, but since I have never seen or tested one I can't say
one way or the other. What I -can- say is that when it comes to marketing, Jay's
"facts" leave a lot to be desired.


fair enough. how do you trust the manufacturers claims for the ant's you
bought?

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that depends on your
point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the keyclowns since he promotes
illegal operation. OTOH, he comes across with an attitude haughtier than my own,
even to the point of appointing himself as the newsgroup's polite-police. And I
won't even go into the technical discussions except to say that for a person who
purports himself to be knowledgable about radio and electronics, he lacks much
of the theory and experience one would expect such an 'expert' to have.

he is an antenna manufacturer. nothing to do with moded radio's.
how do you know what his radio pedigree is? for that matter how does one
know what your experience is other than your claims? works both ways.


But I'm sure you have a different opinion.


dont we all...








-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----



MrTimNebo March 31st 04 03:29 AM

frank, either your posting drunk again or your hate for jay is effecting your
typing. i've never seen you so sloppy. shame shame, somebody's face is read
with jealousy.


That number came from Jay, and it is very relevant because it is one of
several
claims he has made, yet refuses to back up with facts under the excuse that
they
are 'marketing secrets'. I'm can't say that his antennas are junk -- they
might
be outstanding antennas, but since I have never seen or tested one I can't
say
one way or the other. What I -can- say is that when it comes to marketing,
Jay's
"facts" leave a lot to be desired.

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that depends on your
point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the keyclowns since he
promotes
illegal operation. OTOH, he comes across with an attitude haughtier than my
own,
even to the point of appointing himself as the newsgroup's polite-police. And
I
won't even go into the technical discussions except to say that for a person
who
purports himself to be knowledgable about radio and electronics, he lacks
much
of the theory and experience one would expect such an 'expert' to have.

But I'm sure you have a different opinion.




MrTimNebo March 31st 04 03:34 AM

the 12 million cb'ers has nothing to do with anything its just the only thing
frank has ever been able to call jay on in his entire life and he hates that a
fine extra class ham and cb'er like jay puts out such a nice cb product and
happens to know more about antennas than frank himself. it's always ate him up
and its clear to see. it's been a long lasting feud that wasn't worth jay
staying around for. frank is a bully and has drove off alot of good people that
should still be here.



I Am Not George March 31st 04 03:43 AM

(MrTimNebo) wrote:
the 12 million cb'ers has nothing to do with anything its just the

only
thing
frank has ever been able to call jay on in his entire life and he

hates
that a
fine extra class ham and cb'er like jay puts out such a nice cb

product
and
happens to know more about antennas than frank himself. it's always

ate
him up
and its clear to see. it's been a long lasting feud that wasn't worth

jay
staying around for. frank is a bully and has drove off alot of good

people
that
should still be here.


ROTFLMAO Jay is a hero to illegals because he builds a CB antenna to
handle 10,000 watts and his new model is rated 25,000 because his
keyclown customers run power. oh yeah he's a real good ecxtra class
ham allright I bet you wish all the hams were like him LOL. Now go
take another toke from the bowl Nebro.

gw March 31st 04 05:29 AM

(MrTimNebo) wrote in message ...
jay is the REAL deal.............



league city sucks and so does la marque.....put that in your crack
pipe and smoke it nebo......

Landshark March 31st 04 05:44 AM


"Steveo" wrote in message
...
Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I have never
seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What I -can- say is
that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts" leave a lot to be

desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that depends on
your point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the keyclowns since
he promotes illegal operation.

Blah blah blah :)


LOL!!!! Yes, Jay should be shamed for building
something high quality and good performance. As
for his "promoting illegal activities, well it's a good
thing that most normal people don't think like Frank.
Gosh, think of it, Robert Glenn Johnson, doing all
those illegal activities, making money from it, man
what the sport he now help promote would be like
if all had narrow minds like Frank.

Landshark


--
The world is good-natured to people
who are good natured.



Steveo March 31st 04 05:48 AM

"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I have
never seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What I
-can- say is that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts" leave a
lot to be

desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that depends
on your point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the keyclowns
since he promotes illegal operation.

Blah blah blah :)


LOL!!!! Yes, Jay should be shamed for building
something high quality and good performance.

Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.

I Am Not George March 31st 04 06:08 AM

Steveo
Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2004 8:48 PM
Message-id:

"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I

have
never seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What

I
-can- say is that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts"

leave
a
lot to be

desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well

built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that

depends
on your point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the

keyclowns
since he promotes illegal operation.

Blah blah blah :)


LOL!!!! Yes, Jay should be shamed for building
something high quality and good performance.

Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.


yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and adds
heliax feedline. You maroon

Steveo March 31st 04 06:11 AM

(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo

Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2004 8:48 PM
Message-id:

"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I

have
never seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What

I
-can- say is that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts"

leave
a
lot to be
desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well

built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that

depends
on your point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the

keyclowns
since he promotes illegal operation.

Blah blah blah :)

LOL!!!! Yes, Jay should be shamed for building
something high quality and good performance.

Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.


yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and adds
heliax feedline. You maroon

I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has
when I drive it on the street. You maricone

I Am Not George March 31st 04 06:15 AM

Steveo
Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2004 8:48 PM
Message-id:

"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I

have
never seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What

I
-can- say is that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts"

leave
a
lot to be

desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well

built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.

As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that

depends
on your point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the

keyclowns
since he promotes illegal operation.

Blah blah blah :)


LOL!!!! Yes, Jay should be shamed for building
something high quality and good performance.

Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.


yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and adds
heliax feedline. You maroon

I Am Not George March 31st 04 06:19 AM

Steveo wrote:
Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.


yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and adds
heliax feedline. You maroon


I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has
when I drive it on the street. You maricone


we're talking about regular people not illegal pirate cbers like you, you mook.

Steveo March 31st 04 06:22 AM

(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo
wrote:
Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.


yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and adds
heliax feedline. You maroon


I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has
when I drive it on the street. You maricone


we're talking about regular people not illegal pirate cbers like you, you
mook.

You won't know what a regular person is till one sticks
his boot up your wide ass. feltcher

I Am Not George March 31st 04 06:25 AM

Steveo wrote:
Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.


yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and

adds
heliax feedline. You maroon


I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has
when I drive it on the street. You maricone


The legal speed limit is 65 mph, ok lets make it 80 just for laughs.
The legal CB limit is 4w.

Do the math jays antenna is designed for 6250 times the legal limit.
thats like making a car engine capable of 500,00 MPH. give up steveo
your dumber than a box of rocks

Steveo March 31st 04 06:27 AM

(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo
wrote:
Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.


yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and

adds
heliax feedline. You maroon


I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has
when I drive it on the street. You maricone


The legal speed limit is 65 mph, ok lets make it 80 just for laughs.
The legal CB limit is 4w.

Do the math jays antenna is designed for 6250 times the legal limit.
thats like making a car engine capable of 500,00 MPH. give up steveo
your dumber than a box of rocks

Do you red-line your electric meter when you transmit, pato?

Landshark March 31st 04 06:51 AM


"Steveo" wrote in message
...
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo
wrote:
Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.

yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and

adds
heliax feedline. You maroon

I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has
when I drive it on the street. You maricone


The legal speed limit is 65 mph, ok lets make it 80 just for laughs.
The legal CB limit is 4w.

Do the math jays antenna is designed for 6250 times the legal limit.
thats like making a car engine capable of 500,00 MPH. give up steveo
your dumber than a box of rocks

Do you red-line your electric meter when you transmit, pato?


Shame, same thing the ATF said about Robert Glenn Johnson.

Landshark


--
Hard things are put in our way,
not to stop us, but to call out our
courage and strength.



Steveo March 31st 04 06:53 AM

"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo
wrote:
Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.

yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and
adds
heliax feedline. You maroon

I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has
when I drive it on the street. You maricone

The legal speed limit is 65 mph, ok lets make it 80 just for laughs.
The legal CB limit is 4w.

Do the math jays antenna is designed for 6250 times the legal limit.
thats like making a car engine capable of 500,00 MPH. give up steveo
your dumber than a box of rocks

Do you red-line your electric meter when you transmit, pato?


Shame, same thing the ATF said about Robert Glenn Johnson.

Landshark

Humpy Wheeler had it down tho. :)

Landshark March 31st 04 03:14 PM


"Steveo" wrote in message
...
"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo
wrote:
Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't
mean you have to take them to the limit.

yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and
adds
heliax feedline. You maroon

I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has
when I drive it on the street. You maricone

The legal speed limit is 65 mph, ok lets make it 80 just for laughs.
The legal CB limit is 4w.

Do the math jays antenna is designed for 6250 times the legal limit.
thats like making a car engine capable of 500,00 MPH. give up steveo
your dumber than a box of rocks

Do you red-line your electric meter when you transmit, pato?


Shame, same thing the ATF said about Robert Glenn Johnson.

Landshark

Humpy Wheeler had it down tho. :)


True, very true.

Landshark


--
Real heroes are men who fall and fail
and are flawed, but win out in the end
because they've stayed true to their
ideals and beliefs and commitments.



Twistedhed March 31st 04 03:18 PM

LOL!!!! Yes, Jay should be shamed for building something high quality
and good performance. As for his "promoting illegal activities, well
it's a good thing that most normal people don't think like Frank. Gosh,
think of it, Robert Glenn Johnson, doing all those illegal activities,
making money from it, man what the sport he now help promote would be
like if all had narrow minds like Frank.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Landshark
_
Please don't confuse Frank-n-company with facts. They are having a most
difficult time as it is.



Twistedhed March 31st 04 03:20 PM

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
Steveo
wrote:
Just like an automobile, having high quality parts doesn't mean you have
to take them to the limit.
yes he increased the limit no one takes it to from 10K to 25K and adds
heliax feedline. You maroon
_
I don't use but maybe a third of the horsepower my Plymouth has when I
drive it on the street. You maricone

we're talking about regular people not illegal


pirate cbers like you, you mook.

_
Hyuk! You're not "regular people" despite your repeated continued pleas
for acceptance.


Frank Gilliland April 1st 04 04:23 AM

In , jim wrote:



Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , jim wrote:



MrTimNebo wrote:

jay is the REAL deal.............




i went back and looked a little closer this time and saw what i was
looking for. you are right tim, jay is a respected poster to this board.
dont know where the 12 million cbers number came from but its irrelevant.




That number came from Jay, and it is very relevant because it is one of several
claims he has made, yet refuses to back up with facts under the excuse that they
are 'marketing secrets'. I'm can't say that his antennas are junk -- they might
be outstanding antennas, but since I have never seen or tested one I can't say
one way or the other. What I -can- say is that when it comes to marketing, Jay's
"facts" leave a lot to be desired.


fair enough. how do you trust the manufacturers claims for the ant's you
bought?



I don't. Fact is, no antenna manufacturer can make a definitive claim as to an
antenna's performance in every given installation (execpt maybe for dishes). If
it's a full-sized 1/4-wave ground-plane vertical, chances are it will perform no
better than any other 1/4-wave ground-plane vertical -regardless- of who made
it. Same with 5/8-wave verticals. If you can build one yourself from scratch it
will probably perform just as well as one made by Jay or any other manufacturer.


As for being a "respected poster to this board", I guess that depends on your
point of view. He seems to be well-respected by the keyclowns since he promotes
illegal operation. OTOH, he comes across with an attitude haughtier than my own,
even to the point of appointing himself as the newsgroup's polite-police. And I
won't even go into the technical discussions except to say that for a person who
purports himself to be knowledgable about radio and electronics, he lacks much
of the theory and experience one would expect such an 'expert' to have.

he is an antenna manufacturer. nothing to do with moded radio's.



Then the archives are filled with a whole lot of forgeries of Jay.


how do you know what his radio pedigree is? for that matter how does one
know what your experience is other than your claims? works both ways.



The difference is that I back up my technical opinions with logic, facts and
authoritative references. Very few people in this group, regardless of
'pedigree', Jay included, have ever been able to make such a claim.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Frank Gilliland April 1st 04 04:23 AM

In , (MrTimNebo)
wrote:

the 12 million cb'ers has nothing to do with anything its just the only thing
frank has ever been able to call jay on in his entire life and he hates that a
fine extra class ham and cb'er like jay puts out such a nice cb product and
happens to know more about antennas than frank himself. it's always ate him up
and its clear to see. it's been a long lasting feud that wasn't worth jay
staying around for. frank is a bully and has drove off alot of good people that
should still be here.



Yeah, right. People like Sean who has 4000 friends that are CBers in the greater
San Diego area; or like Eitner, the self-declared "CB amp god"; or like Skippy,
the sweep-tube-loving CB-amp-head of a ham whose theory of triode operation
consists of "it's part of a bigger picture". If you really miss the lot of these
tech-wannabes that pushed "Bird-watts" and "swang" as good things, then nobody
is stopping you from whining to another, more appropriate group. I would
recommend "alt.mythology.cb" or "alt.religion.voodoo.cb-amps". Until then, go
smoke your dope, hose your skanks, and leave the technical topics for those of
us that can think for ourselves.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Frank Gilliland April 1st 04 04:23 AM

In , Steveo
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I have never
seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What I -can- say is
that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts" leave a lot to be desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.



I don't doubt it. But since you have one, does it meets all the other claims Jay
has made? Have you had 100mph+ winds lately? Did you have RFI that went away
after installing this antenna?









-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Steveo April 1st 04 05:05 AM

Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Steveo
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I have never
seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What I -can- say
is that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts" leave a lot to be
desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.


I don't doubt it. But since you have one, does it meets all the other
claims Jay has made? Have you had 100mph+ winds lately? Did you have RFI
that went away after installing this antenna?

Luckily no RFI or 100 mph winds to deal with. It did fine in
70+ tho.


Dave Hall April 1st 04 01:15 PM

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:23:52 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Steveo
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I have never
seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What I -can- say is
that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts" leave a lot to be desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.



I don't doubt it. But since you have one, does it meets all the other claims Jay
has made? Have you had 100mph+ winds lately? Did you have RFI that went away
after installing this antenna?


On those two points, while I don't have first hand knowledge, Jay,
having the fortune of living near the Mojave, has a lot of space to do
some unorthodox testing. His 100 MPH wind claim comes from a test
where he mounted one of his antennas in a truck and drove it at 100
MPH (Which is the same as the wind blowing at 100 MPH). I remember
reading about the tests when they happened.

The other claim about RFI is also legitimate. If you replace an
antenna such as an Antron 99, which has poor RF decoupling and
creates a strong near field radiation pattern, with a standard 5/8th
ground plane style antenna, in most cases RFI will be reduced. This is
nothing unique about Jay's antenna, but it is a true characteristic of
the basic design.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Twistedhed April 1st 04 02:50 PM

drooled:
The difference is that I back up my technical


opinions with logic, facts and authoritative


references.


-

So what! Logic is nothing more than a belief and has little or nothing
to do with the true nature of things at times.
--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO
NCI Member
ARRL Member


Twistedhed April 1st 04 03:01 PM

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , Steveo
wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas


are junk -- they might be outstanding


antennas, but since I have never seen or


tested one I can't say one way or the other.




No one expects you to believe anyone else's claims. Your skepticism and
unhealthy cynicism is a character flaw tick.

What I -can- say is that when it comes to


marketing, Jay's "facts" leave a lot to be


desired.





And your qualifications regarding marketing leave much more to be
desired.
-

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.
-
I don't doubt it. But since you have one, does


it meets all the other claims Jay has made?


Have you had 100mph+ winds lately?




Easily. The last "no name" storm destroyed several homes and properties,
caused millions of dollars in damage, and even though my antenna looked
horizontal at times, it was unscathed. This doesn't begin to take into
consideration the countless hurricane spawned storms and winds it has
been through. No problem.
In addition to your ignorance concerning antennas as relating to HF, you
now present your lack of intellect concerning the weather in your own
country.


Did you have RFI that went away after


installing this antenna?




Didn't have any RFI. My receive slightly improved upon installation.



-----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----=3D=3D


Steveo April 2nd 04 12:51 AM

(Twistedhed) wrote:
drooled:
The difference is that I back up my technical


opinions with logic, facts and authoritative


references.


-

So what! Logic is nothing more than a belief and has little or nothing
to do with the true nature of things at times.

Yea, like Woodward doesn't go by your rental.

Dennis #12 December 5th 08 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Hall (Post 137221)
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:23:52 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Steveo
wrote:

Frank Gilliland
wrote:
I'm can't say that his antennas
are junk -- they might be outstanding antennas, but since I have never
seen or tested one I can't say one way or the other. What I -can- say is
that when it comes to marketing, Jay's "facts" leave a lot to be desired.

I've had one for a couple years and can honestly say it's well built,
and works very well. They're not cheap -$- tho.



I don't doubt it. But since you have one, does it meets all the other claims Jay
has made? Have you had 100mph+ winds lately? Did you have RFI that went away
after installing this antenna?


On those two points, while I don't have first hand knowledge, Jay,
having the fortune of living near the Mojave, has a lot of space to do
some unorthodox testing. His 100 MPH wind claim comes from a test
where he mounted one of his antennas in a truck and drove it at 100
MPH (Which is the same as the wind blowing at 100 MPH). I remember
reading about the tests when they happened.

The other claim about RFI is also legitimate. If you replace an
antenna such as an Antron 99, which has poor RF decoupling and
creates a strong near field radiation pattern, with a standard 5/8th
ground plane style antenna, in most cases RFI will be reduced. This is
nothing unique about Jay's antenna, but it is a true characteristic of
the basic design.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

I had the opportunity to frequently communicate with Jay when he was first getting into the business. His initial goal was to come up with an "as good as or better than" replacement for the discontinued 5/8 wave Hygain Super penetrator base station antenna. And he did! Then he started improving his product's design by trial and error testing, (Extensive and exhausting testing regarding a lot of time in automobiles with portable field strength meters). When he started delivering his first antennas, he had a policy of free replacement of any parts that failed , either from high winds, lightning, high power, etc... He then incorporated those heavier duty parts into all new antennas he made to eliminate those 'weak links'. This process continued to improve the product over time to where I believe he has earned the right to make some boisterous claims about his product based on his field success; rather than some engineer's mathamatical determination of theoretical antenna gain VS an isotropic source. He might not be a graduate engineer, but in my opinion he certainly deserves credit for being smart, hard working, and honest.

Dennis #12


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com