RadioBanter - Cool site check it out

In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From:
(Frank*Gilliland) In
,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From:
(Frank*Gilliland) In
,
(Nicolai Carpathia, aka Phineas Gage, aka
Leonard H. Anderson) wrote:
From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In ,
(Nicolai The only thing you throw is lies.
You have been told by the majority of this group your atitude sucks and
you chase me like a loyal mutt.

You think so?

It's not just me, Frank,,others have told you the same thing, and as
usual, you are incapable of seeing yourself as you are viewd.

Well, let's find out just who chases who, shall

we? I propose that for one entire month

Haha,,you didn;t even make one entire weekend, as usual.

Because you never accepted the challenge. In fact, all you did was
whine and make excuses.

we

don't refer to each other directly or indirectly,

by name or by allusion. We will post as if the

other doesn't even exist.
**

You have that chance each and every weekend, Gillinad, yet my return on
Mondays or Tuesdays is greeted with your many bright and jolly petitions
invoking my handle which were made by yourself,,taa-daa,,over the
weekend. Your behavior is habitual, obsessive, and none feel you capable
of cure after all these years.,,LOL.

And you have the same opportunity every time
you return from the weekend. You post on

Friday, give me all weekend to respond to

your post(s), and the first thing you whine

about the next week is about how poor,

defenseless you was so brutally attacked over
the weekend.

That first instinct by yourself to lie gets you in more trouble than you
can handle every time, Frank. See, i do not "post" on Friday giving you
all weekend to reply to my post. I "reply" on Friday to your cries and
rants blaming me for being your personal anti-christ. You will find all
my posts on Friday directed to yourself are replies to *your*
posts,,,posts with *me* as your topic. Go on,,check them all out and
seethe with yet more anger as your favorite person is right as rain
again.

Excusum semanticum.

You have been taught before if you wish no contact with me, merely
exhibit some self-control and void me of your thougths, if that
possible. Do not make your topic, do not speak of me,,,,for if you
wished no response by myself, you would not invoke my handle.

Gee, what a concept. And how did you learn this little tidbit of
wisdom, Twist? Practical experience? LOL!

this
called communication. This is how usenet works.

.......OK group, are you all ready for this one?.......

Athis is how proper communication wroks,

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

despite your many torrid cries of how unhappy you
are with the way this system of communication operates, culminating in
your failure to start your own fascist, er..moderated newsgroup. Starved
for status which you are continually denied and not permitted by myself
or any other.

SOBR.

Yet it is -you- that defends your continued

participation by whining about how you are

compelled to respond to every post directed at
you

"Compelled" is an excellent choice of terminology for the myriad of
thread titles you initiate with my handle as your
topic...................... (chuckle),,,I find it amazing that you fail
to grasp the simplest of all,,,,such is exactly how usenet works. When a
post is "directed" at one, it is done so to elicit a response. Your
fascination and confusion with such a simple concept is astoundingly
frightening, then again, simple, proper communication technique, (such
as the golden rule to treat others as you would be treated) has always
confounded you, elicited confused screams and babbles, and eluded your
grasp.

Yet whenever someone puts your own ideals into practice all you can do
is whine about it. Sure, Twist. PKB.

**(except, of course, any dialog which you

have no chance of spinning, which you

characteristically ignore or snip).

Never have I initiated or introduced snipping into a thread.

Such a blatant and easily proven lie is why I, even after having
admitted to lying in the newsgroup, have much more integrity than you
can ever hope to have.

Returning
your usenet behavior and shoving it down your throat has always been an
added bonus not intended by myself,,,but then again, such wouldn't take
place if you wouldn't so readily permit it.

My "usenet behavior" is available for everyone to see on google. So is
yours, although much of yours is disguised. You shouldn't let people
like me bother you so much -- just because you are too afraid put your
name to your words (to the point where even your sock-puppets have
sock-puppets), that is no reason for you to get obsessed about people
who can be honest.

_
You've been proved a liar by many, Frank, otherwise, I would agree to
this.

I have admitted lying,

Not at all, The extraction was taken from you in a specific thread when
you claimed you didn't care about illegal cb. You had to be shown a post
you made a few years ago detailing your reasons for your hositility
toward those who don't follow specific FCC rules that make them "illegal
cbers".You know the post, the one where you list your reasons for caring
about all that you construe unfair.

......that's one interpretation....I guess.....although I do believe
that the FCC rules themselves make the determination as to who is an
illegal CBer.

but neither you nor anyone else has ever

provided any proof of such, only delusions and
groundless suspicions.

See above as your admittance or word regarding must be taken with a
grain of salt and nothing more than internet entertainment and can be
filed with just about everything else one finds on the net.

SOBR.

*

I neither use nor need any sockpuppets,

Twist. It is -you- that has been caught several

times using sockpuppets, such as 1mangang

A subject that causes you great pain. If I was 1mangang, who was
lmangang?

You were both, as if it makes any difference.

and . And because -you-

couldn't get away with it you must blame

others for doing the same.

Hehhe,,yea, I'm upset because of an internet personality that was here 4
or 5 years ago

Is that what you call your sock-puppets? Internet personalities? Damn,
Twist, you are more disturbed than I suspected. Don't you see what's
happening to yourself? Your paranoid schizophrenia has not only forced
your splintered mind into a multiple-personality disorder, but it has
also justified the disorder as necessary for the execution of your
"golden rule" of revenge (i.e, "do unto others so they will do unto
you and subsequently justify you doing unto others first"). Hmmmm....
so you beat your dog because you feel it will bite you in the future,
and when it finally bites you, you then feel vindicated for having
beat your dog. That's -REALLY- twisted, Twist!

that got the best of you. In fact, I have harbored such hostility over
your effective and skilled debate with 1mangang or lmangang all those
years ago, that your crying about Toll, Jay, and Eitner, gave me just
the reason to "blame" you for being Iamnotgeorge2004 as a direct
retaliation for this gang fellow that only you invoke many years
later..hehehe....

And there is an example of Twisty's "golden rule" in it's finest form.
The fact is I rarely mixed it up with your "internet personalities" of
1mangang -or- lmangang. However you did send me an email which I
posted and which exposed your webtv IP in the header. Is that the
foundation of your grudge with me? That I posted proof of your fake
identity which you basically handed to me on a platter? You should be
whining to the mirror, Twist..... oh, that's right, you have this
issue about taking responsibility for your own actions -- you can't.

see, Gillinad, not only can you not get over yourself,
you can't get over things that occurred years ago in your miserable
life.,,heehee,,,that's a helluva lot of baggage to carry all the
time...no wonder you have problems,,,,and you claim you hold no
grudge,,hyuok,,home run for the 1mangang! (or was it
lmangang),,(chuckle).

SOBR + projection.

You merely escalate your anger under your sock puppets, such as
iamnotgeorge2004, _
and use it to maintain your malice and
obsession, while lying and denying it is you, but that's all good, too,
as everyone knows your knowledge was soundly trounced by Jay and Toll
and Eitner and others and you hold grudges and have attacked them by
invoking their names throughout your posting history when they were
nowhere to be found.

I don't hold grudges, Twist.

Sure you do, Frank. You are quite Twisted, my friend. The fact that you
can't even see the forest for the trees is a very pressing and serious
problem for you. Frankly, the mere repeated mention by yourself of an
internet personality that hasn't posted in years (1mangag, lmangang,
Toll, Eitner) illustrates you indeed hold a grudge. Your repeated
bitching, whining and moaning about Toll, Eitner and Jay when they
haven't posted in some time illustrates the intensity of how the past
continues to affect and reek havoc on your bent and Twisted psyche. Not
being able to see it yourself is the reason for the laughter you hear
directed toward yourself. Those not laughing merely shake their heads
with pity for you.

It wasn't me that brought up the issue of voodoo techs. But of course
you can't believe that since you still think I'm "iamnotgeorge2004".
Now I'm curious as to what would happen if I said that I -was- the
"internet personality" in question -- after all, you yourself said
that I am a liar and that I can't be trusted. So if I proclaim myself
to be "iamnotgeorge2004", are you going to bounce back and say that
I'm not? I doubt it. LOL!!! From now on I'll neither admit nor deny
any of your delusions -- it's more fun that way!

I give credit where credit is due and discredit

those that deserve it. Heck, I have even given

-you- credit for some things over the years.

But what you say means nothing,,,nada,,,zip,,,,

uh huh. right. sure. Does anybody believe that?

.....anybody?

I merely enjoy watching
internet thugs like yourself become all consumed and ate up with
self-created frustration that always leads to self-destruction,,,that a
small percentage of those like yourself are unable to comprehend their
own deterioration and get over themselves is reason enough to permit you
all the razor blades you wish to chew upon.

Now I'm an "internet thug". When did I get demoted from being an
"internet terrorist"? LOL!!!

But I usually don't include Jay in the list of

voodoo techs -- he knows his antennas, which
I can respect regardless of his inconsistent

statements regarding other radio gear and his

position on illegal operation.

Another self-contradiction, as you have claimed that those who break the
law in any manner are not due respect,

I never said anything of the sort, Twist. Respect is earned. You
haven't figured out how to earn any respect from anyone, so don't
start whining when someone else earns -my- respect.

and lest you forget, Jay talks dx
on his cb. Just another in a long line of bull**** from you,
illusttating you talk out both sides of your mouth and don't even adhere
to your own claims.

You mean like when you agreed to take our conversation to email on the
clearly-stated condition that I participate in the military group of
your choosing? So where is that group, Twist?

The voodoo tech

list includes not just Toll and Eitner, but also

Skippy, Tnom, Brian, and a few others.

Brian? You mean Griffey in Chicago? Hahaha,,,you have problems with
every one who knows more than you.

Yes, Brian Griffey, the tech-wannabe who hacked a "Class-C linear",
claimed that linear operation is not required for SSB, and thinks the
'flywheel effect' happens without a resonant tank.

And

you are ignoring the fact that I don't refer to

Sean and Toll as two different people, as I

explained before.

Non-sequitur.

Well, at least you didn't use it as a noun this time. But you really
need to lay off those hyphens -- they will give you away every time,
Leonard. LOL!

OTOH, Leland hasn't posted in a long time yet
you "invoke" his name constantly.

Lelnad posts daily.

Really? Which sock-puppet do you think -he- uses?

You have defended him and N8WWM and N3CVJ on
numerous occasions

I have never defended Adair. On the contrary, I have stated many times
that I do not agree with his methods (if they can actually be called
'methods'). Hall and Scott (and that's Leland Scott, just in case some
dopehead thinks I'm talking about Scott69) are perfectly capable of
defending themselves, especially against your paranoid accusations.

when it has been proved the lot of you are malicious
and all about harassment by any means. Wasn't that long ago you were
identified by several on this group of sending viruses to
participants..

Wrong:

http://tinyurl.com/2mofs

and even if you weren't guilty, the mere fact that you
were the number one suspect (save your breath, despite appointing me as
your personal savior and anti-christ, it wasn't myself that blamed you)
illustrates just how you are viewed in this group. You not comprehending
it is priceless.

You still have a problem with facts, Twist: Sideband was the first
person to make mention of the alleged virus, and he accused Voobner.
You and your sock-puppets often suggested that I was Voobner. But the
whole matter seemed to come to a close after Tim admitted creating the
file and sending it to Voobner. The copies I received had no virus,
and Sideband never posted a header to prove it was from Voobner or
anybody else. IOW, your perceptions are in conflict with the facts as
usual.

And when I was gone for several months you

"invoked" my name on a weekly basis.

You weren't gone for a few months. You
refrained from posting under your own email and handle for a little over
three and a half weeks and began posting again from another ip after
having yours ripped and tos'ed from your chubby little hands for tos and
aup violations.

You're not playing the game, Twist. You are supposed to whine about
how I was only gone for 2-1/2 months, after which I would quote the
paranoid response you gave upon my return -- "you were never gone".
And none of my ISPs have ever TOSsed me as you claim but cannot prove
(or even come up with any of your semi-suspicious conincidences to
support such a lame accusation).

It is -you- that regularly "invokes" the names of those whom -you- have
a grudge, even when they are not present. *This most certainly
illustrates YOUR
obsession as one who can't "let it go", or let anything go, regardless
the pathetic whines you continue to offer holding yourself as victim.

You have been whining for years about how

Leland forged you, yet your 'proof', like all of

your 'proof', was shredded by Ockham's razor.

You can say it over and over but it simply won;t make it any more so,

Gee, that's what I have been telling you all these years that you have
been accusing me of being N7VCF. Maybe if you repeat it a few more
times the Identity Fairy will hear you and grant you a wish.

It wasn't my word,,,it was Dick's word, and you shredded nothing,

Speaking of 'shredding', there can't be much left of Dick's shirt-tail
after all your clawing and scratching.

let
alone Ockham,

You, a "self-professed" "professional journalist", never heard of
Ockham's razor! And if that wasn't bad enough you didn't even have
enough brains to look it up. ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!!

except your own credibility with often repeated lies
concerning who blamed Lelnad. Once again, I wasn't even present in the
hammie group in whcih Dick identified KC8LDO as forging myself and
others.

There you go with another attempt at "truth-by-repitition". Thank
goodness for Google.

Then you defend your grudge by misquoting

the late DM, a person that can no longer

defend his own statements.

I didn't misquote Dick, Frank. I presented his post unedited and in its
entirety,

You posted it out of the context of the thread and into the context of
your obsession with Leland.

something that prevents you from functioning coherently.

The context of the thread prevents your claim from functioning
coherently.

Do
you need see it again so you can illustrate just what part you
misinterpret as being misquoted by myself, even though I presented the
post isolated and in its entirety? He clearely stated Lelnad was forging
myself and Train and Timbo in the hammie groups.

Allow me:

http://tinyurl.com/2sapq

And I'm even going to add that link to my sig file!

You also whined about how I butted into your

business on a public forum,

Not true,,I said nothing of the sort, Frank, any time. Your pretty upset
right about now, Frank. What's eating at you in such a profound manner?

You don't remember posting this: "Wrong. You stuck your nose into
someone elses business. I mentioned you not once until you interefered
and began taking sides of the pornposting posse."? Strange, looking
through google it sure looks like you posted that line. Matter of
fact, it looks like most of 2001 was spent by you whining about how I
butted into your business.

but failing to

mention that I did so only after you continued

your malicious attacks on your 'critics' which I

had managed to silence for the sake of

newsgroup peace.

LOL,,sure you did. There were no malicious attacks by myself,,,as I had
no critics. These "critics" you allude, were limited to N8WWM, KC8LDO,
and Kari the Finnish,,er,,,boy...you joined the fray and had your head
handed to you,,,several times. Your entire little cliqued out group of
"antis" has been shown to be internet bullies and cowards. You have
aligned yourself with some real losers, Frank,,,birds of a feather.

As I said before, thank goodness for google.

But of course, this won't be any fun unless

there are stakes involved.

Says you. I have fun all the time.

I suppose you do; that is, of course, if your idea of fun is to spend
half the day in front of the computer, the other half in front of the
TV, and only taking time out to raid the fridge and cash your welfare
check.

So if you think that

you have the self-discipline to overcome your

obsessions for one month then name your

stakes.

Frank, pay attention,,,I have everything I want,,,,you have nothing to
offer myself which I didn't already take,,,such was recognized by utmost
satisfaction with the manner in which you are viewed.

Where's that military group, Twist?

Same place as your list of companies you were to present that were
suffering interference from illegal cb. Repeating your angered stutters
is not getting back on the wagon, Frank. That you suffered so greatly
you needed to tell this group you quit drinking and outline the reasons
for such, then to watch you fall again and begin that downward familiar
spiral the bottle hands you each and every time, must be quite agonizing
for you. At least by wearing your alcoholism on your sleeve you gain
sympathy, as intelligent individuals recognize your behavior and
problems stem from a sickness and disease.

Yes, you do suffer from a disease. It's called 'excusum ad-nauseum'.

Where's that military group, Twist?

=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7
http://tinyurl.com/2sapq
(Twisty cast the first stone)

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."

"...but as usual, your best simpl isn;t good enough."

"Athis is how proper communication wroks..."

---- Twistedhed ----

=============

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----