Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the top was parallel with the ground (pointing East, if that makes a difference). Measurements were compared to the antenna straight up.......; SWR didn't change at all, and vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair. However, horizontally polarized field strength made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the lanyard. Some weak signals disappeared while others came in that weren't there before. Let the whip go back to vertical and the old signals came back while the new signals were lost. Let's see..............An antennas bent so that the tip is parallel to the ground?.............That represents an antenna that is now midway between horizontal and vertical polarization. The theoretical gain of that antenna should be equal between polarizations. When such a scenario is in place the field strength should drop to .707 of it's original. That represents a 3db loss just from this antenna being bent. Yet you stated.................................... "vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair." When testing mobile antennas a 3db loss is huge. Most all well designed efficient non bent antennas will easily beat your -3db antenna. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Ideas for a home built 2meter/440 dual band base antenna | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
Need HF / Mobile Antenna Recommendation | Antenna | |||
Wanted: SWAN Mobile Antenna Info | Antenna |