Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:50:09 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote: "KAXN-9546" wrote in message The FCC passed juridstiction over to local/state level for enforcement. they are well within thier rights. But doesn't that just mean enforcing existing federal regulations? I don't think local laws need to be passed for local enforcement of a federal law. I could be wrong. I'm not a lawyer. :-) -Dr.X It's quite obvious that you are not a lawyer. States are free to pass any law that does not conflict with federal regulation. In this case, the state's law compliments the federal statute, and does not come in conflict with the federal law. Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546 SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS 607-733-5745 telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000 Your a hoot Ray.............. In this cast all it's doing is putting into law the exact same FCC regulation, political double talk. Landshark I never said they weren't. But in doing so, they established a clear, legal path to providing enforcement powers to a largely ignored federal statute. Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546 SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS 607-733-5745 telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|