"Landshark" wrote:
"KAXN-9546" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:50:09 GMT, "Landshark"

wrote:


"KAXN-9546" wrote in message

The FCC passed juridstiction over to local/state level for
enforcement.
they are well within thier rights.

But doesn't that just mean enforcing existing federal
regulations?
I
don't
think local laws need to be passed for local enforcement of a
federal
law. I
could be wrong. I'm not a lawyer. :-)

-Dr.X


It's quite obvious that you are not a lawyer. States are free
to pass
any law that does not conflict with federal regulation. In this
case,
the state's law compliments the federal statute, and does not
come
in
conflict with the federal law.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000


Your a hoot Ray.............. In this cast all
it's doing is putting into law the exact same
FCC regulation, political double talk.

Landshark

I never said they weren't. But in doing so, they established a
clear,
legal path to providing enforcement powers to a largely ignored
federal statute.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000

Well, spitting on the sidewalk is against the law, but largely
ignored. Copying videos, either DVD or tape is a federal law,
when was the last time they raided your neighbor for that?

Landshark


Why do keyclowns defend law breaking? see how land shark runs to
uphold criminal behavior. There must be a deep seated reason for it.