On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:33:28 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote:


"Glenn S." wrote in message
.. .

Which omnidirectional base antenna will put out the least TV
and telephone interference in the neighborhood?

It doesn't depend on the antenna almost at all. The main cause of
interference is from three sources. One a dirty transmitter, the second is
from receiver front end over load, and the third is from RF getting in to
the electronics directly.

That's not entirely true. The antenna DOES have a part to play in the
whole mess. Some of the "stick"-type antennas, such as the A-99, have
poor decoupling and this allows for significant coaxial shield
radiation. Some of these antennas also concentrate a good portion of
their near field radiation in places where it would exacerbate front
end overload or couple R.F. into house wiring.

An otherwise clean transmitter coupled to an antenna with the above
characteristics can cross the line between no RFI and significant RFI.
In some cases, this can be mitigated somewhat by moving the antenna
(usually raising it) to another area, where it's radiation will not
couple as much R.F. into neighboring premises. A better solution would
be to run an antenna with ground plane radials, such as a Sigma 5/8
wave or similar.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

An otherwise clean transmitter coupled to an antenna with the above
characteristics can cross the line between no RFI and significant RFI.
In some cases, this can be mitigated somewhat by moving the antenna
(usually raising it) to another area, where it's radiation will not
couple as much R.F. into neighboring premises. A better solution would
be to run an antenna with ground plane radials, such as a Sigma 5/8 wave
or similar.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj
_
And the running of certain amplifiers will NOT compound or add
additional RFI in such cases. A perfect linear for cbers is a palomar,
as it is not class C, which certain long-time hammie posters in
rec.radio.cb consider to be some kind of devil-spawned conspiratorial
gadget to reek havoc and cause misery in their radio lives.

(Twistedhed) wrote in message ...
An otherwise clean transmitter coupled to an antenna with the above
characteristics can cross the line between no RFI and significant RFI.
In some cases, this can be mitigated somewhat by moving the antenna
(usually raising it) to another area, where it's radiation will not
couple as much R.F. into neighboring premises. A better solution would
be to run an antenna with ground plane radials, such as a Sigma 5/8 wave
or similar.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj
_
And the running of certain amplifiers will NOT compound or add
additional RFI in such cases. A perfect linear for cbers is a palomar,

there you go again encouraging lawbreaking

as it is not class C, which certain long-time hammie posters in
rec.radio.cb consider to be some kind of devil-spawned conspiratorial
gadget to reek havoc and cause misery in their radio lives.

LOL its 'wreak' havoc not reek, journalism boy

"I Am Not George" wrote in message
m...
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
An otherwise clean transmitter coupled to an antenna with the above
characteristics can cross the line between no RFI and significant RFI.
In some cases, this can be mitigated somewhat by moving the antenna
(usually raising it) to another area, where it's radiation will not
couple as much R.F. into neighboring premises. A better solution would
be to run an antenna with ground plane radials, such as a Sigma 5/8 wave
or similar.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj
_
And the running of certain amplifiers will NOT compound or add
additional RFI in such cases. A perfect linear for cbers is a palomar,

there you go again encouraging lawbreaking

as it is not class C, which certain long-time hammie posters in
rec.radio.cb consider to be some kind of devil-spawned conspiratorial
gadget to reek havoc and cause misery in their radio lives.

LOL its 'wreak' havoc not reek, journalism boy

Are you sure?

"I ain't George either" wrote:
"I Am Not George" wrote in message
om...
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
An otherwise clean transmitter coupled to an antenna with the
above
characteristics can cross the line between no RFI and significant
RFI.
In some cases, this can be mitigated somewhat by moving the
antenna
(usually raising it) to another area, where it's radiation will
not
couple as much R.F. into neighboring premises. A better solution
would
be to run an antenna with ground plane radials, such as a Sigma
5/8 wave
or similar.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj
_
And the running of certain amplifiers will NOT compound or add
additional RFI in such cases. A perfect linear for cbers is a
palomar,

there you go again encouraging lawbreaking

as it is not class C, which certain long-time hammie posters in
rec.radio.cb consider to be some kind of devil-spawned
conspiratorial
gadget to reek havoc and cause misery in their radio lives.

LOL its 'wreak' havoc not reek, journalism boy

Are you sure?


"WREAK" *

Definition: * [v] *cause to happen or to occur as a consequence;
"wreak havoc"

"REEK"

Definition: *

[n] *a distinctive odor that is offensively unpleasant
[v] *have an element suggestive (of something); "Twisty saying he is a
journalist reeks of untruth, especially since he doesn't know the
difference between "reek" and "wreak"."

"I Am Not George" wrote in message
m...
"I ain't George either" wrote:
"I Am Not George" wrote in message
. com...
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
An otherwise clean transmitter coupled to an antenna with the
above
characteristics can cross the line between no RFI and significant
RFI.
In some cases, this can be mitigated somewhat by moving the
antenna
(usually raising it) to another area, where it's radiation will
not
couple as much R.F. into neighboring premises. A better solution
would
be to run an antenna with ground plane radials, such as a Sigma
5/8 wave
or similar.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj
_
And the running of certain amplifiers will NOT compound or add
additional RFI in such cases. A perfect linear for cbers is a
palomar,

there you go again encouraging lawbreaking

as it is not class C, which certain long-time hammie posters in
rec.radio.cb consider to be some kind of devil-spawned
conspiratorial
gadget to reek havoc and cause misery in their radio lives.

LOL its 'wreak' havoc not reek, journalism boy

Are you sure?


"WREAK"

Definition: [v] cause to happen or to occur as a consequence;
"wreak havoc"

"REEK"

Definition:

[n] a distinctive odor that is offensively unpleasant
[v] have an element suggestive (of something); "Twisty saying he is a
journalist reeks of untruth, especially since he doesn't know the
difference between "reek" and "wreak"."

Glad you pointed that out. You reek of stupidity. Would that be a proper
use?

(Twistedhed) wrote:
WA3MOJ wrote:
LOL its 'wreak' havoc not reek, journalism boy
_
Oh ye who live in glass houses,,,,the term was used correctly in many
of
my past posts,,,,lack of sleep, coming off the road after a long two
days straight driving and my return has you beside yourself seeking
typo/grammatical errors in my playground. You may now relax.

you get tired so you substitute reek for wreak but you spell
devil-spawned conspiratorial correctly ha ha lol twisty you lie like a
rug

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
WA3MOJ wrote:
LOL its 'wreak' havoc not reek, journalism boy
_
Oh ye who live in glass houses,,,,the term was used correctly in many of
my past posts,,,,lack of sleep, coming off the road after a long two
days straight driving and my return has you beside yourself seeking
typo/grammatical errors in my playground. You may now relax.
_
you get tired so you substitute reek for wreak

but you spell devil-spawned conspiratorial

correctly ha ha lol twisty you lie like a rug



Hehehe,,,the style of typing with your index finger prevents you from
understanding such things.

WA3MOJ wrote:
LOL its 'wreak' havoc not reek, journalism boy
_
Oh ye who live in glass houses,,,,the term was used correctly in many of
my past posts,,,,lack of sleep, coming off the road after a long two
days straight driving and my return has you beside yourself seeking
typo/grammatical errors in my playground. You may now relax.

(Twistedhed) wrote:
WA3MOJ wrote:
LOL its 'wreak' havoc not reek, journalism boy
_
Oh ye who live in glass houses,,,,the term was used correctly in many of
my past posts,,,,lack of sleep, coming off the road after a long two
days straight driving and my return has you beside yourself seeking
typo/grammatical errors in my playground. You may now relax.

Hey Twist, that's N8WWM you're responding to.