AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL
 

AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL


The FCC has acted to approve the implementation of Brodband Over
Powerline technology (BPL) for widspread Internet access in the
United States. We were able to get in and record part of the October
14th proceeding which is now posted as a downloadable MP3 file at our
website: www.arnewsline.org/quincy under the title of "EXTRA".


The speakers you will hear inorder of their appearance are FCC
Commissioners Michael Copps, Kevin Martin, Jonathan Adelstein and FCC
Chairman Michael Powell. The presentation concludes with the actual
vote to proceed with the implementation of BPL


ARNewsline (tm)











Yahoo! Groups Links


* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arnewsline/


* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

On 14 Oct 2004 20:09:07 GMT, (Radionews) wrote:

AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL


The FCC has acted to approve the implementation of Brodband Over
Powerline technology (BPL) for widspread Internet access in the
United States. We were able to get in and record part of the October
14th proceeding which is now posted as a downloadable MP3 file at our
website: www.arnewsline.org/quincy under the title of "EXTRA".


The speakers you will hear inorder of their appearance are FCC
Commissioners Michael Copps, Kevin Martin, Jonathan Adelstein and FCC
Chairman Michael Powell. The presentation concludes with the actual
vote to proceed with the implementation of BPL


ARNewsline (tm)











Yahoo! Groups Links


* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arnewsline/


* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:


After listening to the Mp3 clip I have a concern about the FCC
pulling a fast one.

The third commissioner to speak, Jonathan Adelstien was talking about
"techniques to address interference issues". He said "some of these
systems can co-exist very well with existing licensees"

Why did he feel the need to include the word "existing"? Is the plan
of the FCC to grandfather "existing amateurs" and allow them a say in
interference issues, but nullify the future amateurs ability to
complain about these same issues? Will the total burden of
interference be the problem of future amateurs? Will the FCC only
have to wait until the existing licensees die out before they can go
full throttle with BPL?