If kerry loses....
 

is he gonna apply for another purple heart??...

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????


Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??

Mrs Kerry is "hot"????? Laura Bush is a friggin' pin-up compared to
Theresa. Daughter Alex is nice, Vannessa is just "ok". Bush twins are
pretty average as well.

Damn Frank, I'll google up a hooker for ya if she'll take paypal :-)

Don

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????


Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

LOL, RF kills crotch crickets..or smother them in ketsup! :)

"M-Tech" wrote:
Mrs Kerry is "hot"????? Laura Bush is a friggin' pin-up compared to
Theresa. Daughter Alex is nice, Vannessa is just "ok". Bush twins are
pretty average as well.

Damn Frank, I'll google up a hooker for ya if she'll take paypal :-)

Don

OMG! If Frank thinks accoutrement girl is HAWT, we might want to all spring
in for an eye exam. RF causes cataracts too. :)


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????


Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:20:01 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

Mrs Kerry is "hot"?????


Compared to the women in Spokane she's practically a supermodel.


Laura Bush is a friggin' pin-up compared to
Theresa.


Naw, too much plastic surgery. It makes her look.... well, plastic. If
I want a plastic woman I'll order one through the mail.


Daughter Alex is nice, Vannessa is just "ok". Bush twins are
pretty average as well.


Hmmmm, maybe I'm seeing something different than everyone else.


Damn Frank, I'll google up a hooker for ya if she'll take paypal :-)


Thanks, but I'll pass..... do hookers really take paypal?







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On 27 Oct 2004 23:50:37 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??


www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 23:50:37 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??

www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected. Funny
sorta that it sticks in my mind about Ralph fighting for the Corvair
owners. My Dad had one that was loads of fun, in fact he used to put
that Corvair up on the railroad tracks and half deflate the tires.. That
car would hum down those tracks and my old man would be laughing his
ass off yelling "look no hands"!

Me and my dad have done some crazy **** over the years, but I never
figured Ralph Nader would be a common bond for him and I. That kind
of change probably won't happen in our lifetime, Frank. :)

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Thanks, but I'll pass..... do hookers really take paypal?

Something is so wrong about that. lol

somehoiw i got onto a website the other day that had just that...escorts who
accepted paypal...lol
nope i am not that bad off..jus ended up there by a pop-up.....besides my
plastic sheep would get jealous..:D
harv
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
| Frank Gilliland wrote:
| Thanks, but I'll pass..... do hookers really take paypal?
|
| Something is so wrong about that. lol

Yep, lookout for that barnyard bonaza! :P

"harvey" wrote:
somehoiw i got onto a website the other day that had just that...escorts
who accepted paypal...lol
nope i am not that bad off..jus ended up there by a pop-up.....besides my
plastic sheep would get jealous..:D
harv
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
| Frank Gilliland wrote:
| Thanks, but I'll pass..... do hookers really take paypal?
|
| Something is so wrong about that. lol

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:20:01 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

Mrs Kerry is "hot"?????


Compared to the women in Spokane she's practically a supermodel.


Laura Bush is a friggin' pin-up compared to
Theresa.


Naw, too much plastic surgery. It makes her look.... well, plastic. If
I want a plastic woman I'll order one through the mail.


Daughter Alex is nice, Vannessa is just "ok". Bush twins are
pretty average as well.


Hmmmm, maybe I'm seeing something different than everyone else.


Damn Frank, I'll google up a hooker for ya if she'll take paypal :-)


Thanks, but I'll pass..... do hookers really take paypal?


LOL!!!

Landshark


--
Treat people as if they were what
they ought to be and you will help
them become what they are capable
of becoming.

On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.


I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

Because people keep voting for who they think will be the 'winner',
the next president will either be tweedle-dum or tweedle-dee (thank
you, Helen Keller, for your wonderful insight), and partisan politics
will always take precedence over common sense and public interests.
The two parties like it that way. Both were scared ****less when Perot
made a strong showing in his first run. But instead of choosing better
candidates to compete against third parties, they shut-out the other
parties as much as possible.

I vote for independence -- independence from the two-party cartel. We
will never be given better choices until we begin to -make- better
choices. IMHO.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.

I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

We could write in people too. Maybe Ross Perot or Captain Kangaroo, that
won't change reality much tho, now will it?

Hey, at least you and I vote, I wish more people would.

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.


I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

Because people keep voting for who they think will be the 'winner',
the next president will either be tweedle-dum or tweedle-dee (thank
you, Helen Keller, for your wonderful insight), and partisan politics
will always take precedence over common sense and public interests.
The two parties like it that way. Both were scared ****less when Perot
made a strong showing in his first run. But instead of choosing better
candidates to compete against third parties, they shut-out the other
parties as much as possible.

I vote for independence -- independence from the two-party cartel. We
will never be given better choices until we begin to -make- better
choices. IMHO.





But Frank, even though I agree with you 100%, do you think it's possible to
pound this in to the voter's minds?

"harvey" wrote in message
. ..
somehoiw i got onto a website the other day that had just that...escorts
who
accepted paypal...lol
nope i am not that bad off..jus ended up there by a pop-up.....besides my
plastic sheep would get jealous..:D
harv

Somehow? Now that's funny!!!!!

On 28 Oct 2004 04:17:43 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.

I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

We could write in people too. Maybe Ross Perot or Captain Kangaroo, that
won't change reality much tho, now will it?


You bet it will! Wouldn't it be great to see more podiums during the
presidential debates?


Hey, at least you and I vote, I wish more people would.


I hate to see people voting just for the sake of voting. As we've
learned with GWB, we need to make our decisions very carefully. Not
everyone does. Maybe voting should be left to those that are willing
to take responsibility for their decisions......





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

FreakOut wrote:
Answer him freak, we have seen your posts regarding such things on the
net.

Hi George, how'z the new handle working out for you? Did your hero send
in his back child support check this week?

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:37:12 GMT, "U Know Who"
wrote in
:


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
.. .
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.


I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

Because people keep voting for who they think will be the 'winner',
the next president will either be tweedle-dum or tweedle-dee (thank
you, Helen Keller, for your wonderful insight), and partisan politics
will always take precedence over common sense and public interests.
The two parties like it that way. Both were scared ****less when Perot
made a strong showing in his first run. But instead of choosing better
candidates to compete against third parties, they shut-out the other
parties as much as possible.

I vote for independence -- independence from the two-party cartel. We
will never be given better choices until we begin to -make- better
choices. IMHO.





But Frank, even though I agree with you 100%, do you think it's possible to
pound this in to the voter's minds?


They are already receiving a heavy pounding from all the political
mud-slinging. Maybe people would actually be -happy- to be offered an
escape route.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 04:17:43 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.

I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

We could write in people too. Maybe Ross Perot or Captain Kangaroo, that
won't change reality much tho, now will it?

You bet it will! Wouldn't it be great to see more podiums during the
presidential debates?

Hey, at least you and I vote, I wish more people would.

I hate to see people voting just for the sake of voting. As we've
learned with GWB, we need to make our decisions very carefully. Not
everyone does. Maybe voting should be left to those that are willing
to take responsibility for their decisions......

Maybe in a vacuum, but in reality less than half of our eligible population
actually exercise their right. They do restrict felons and such from
voting, but I doubt they'd make a difference.

Everyone should vote or stfu if you didn't.

On 28 Oct 2004 04:17:43 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.

I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

We could write in people too. Maybe Ross Perot or Captain Kangaroo, that
won't change reality much tho, now will it?

Hey, at least you and I vote, I wish more people would.


I disagree. There are way too many people in this country, who can't
even name their congresspeople, or even the name of the vice
president. People who have no idea how government works, or that have
little to no depth of knowledge of the issues at hand, should refrain
from voting. It's way too much responsibility for someone who is
clueless.

I don't want another president (or vice president) who is elected
because they have "nice hair"......

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Dave Hall wrote:
I don't want another president (or vice president) who is elected
because they have "nice hair"......

How about a botox face? Save the hair for the VP?

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
FreakOut wrote:
Answer him freak, we have seen your posts regarding such things on the
net.

Hi George, how'z the new handle working out for you? Did your hero send
in his back child support check this week?

LMAO!! Talk about obsession. He's been harping about
Randy responding to Doug, I haven't posted anything in a
few days, week maybe. I make one post LOL over something
that Frank said, he goes on with his harassment of CB'ers.

Landshark

just wait till he figures out who i actually am...
harv
"Landshark" wrote in message
...
|
| "Steveo" wrote in message
| ...
| FreakOut wrote:
| Answer him freak, we have seen your posts regarding such things on the
| net.
|
| Hi George, how'z the new handle working out for you? Did your hero send
| in his back child support check this week?
|
| LMAO!! Talk about obsession. He's been harping about
| Randy responding to Doug, I haven't posted anything in a
| few days, week maybe. I make one post LOL over something
| that Frank said, he goes on with his harassment of CB'ers.
|
| Landshark
|
|
|

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be VERY
different.

Don

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 27 Oct 2004 23:50:37 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??


www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:09:21 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be VERY
different.


If over 50% of the voters made their choices based on facts and logic
instead of picking the candidate that makes them "feel good", his
answers wouldn't need to be ANY different.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:09:21 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be
VERY
different.


If over 50% of the voters made their choices based on facts and logic
instead of picking the candidate that makes them "feel good", his
answers wouldn't need to be ANY different.


And what happened to the revolt against the electoral college after the last
election?

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:09:21 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be
VERY
different.


If over 50% of the voters made their choices based on facts and logic
instead of picking the candidate that makes them "feel good", his
answers wouldn't need to be ANY different.

I can't add anything to that except...NO KIDDING!!!

Don