|
|
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge) (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong. A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania, Oh, a marketing ploy certainly makes it official, then. i didnt say they were devoid of radar or a non radar state. That IS exactly what the phrase you invoked means. I said penns was not a radar state by any means there are states that use radar in every town municipality and boro, penns is not one of them, that means they are not really a "radar state" that is not thier primary means of speed enforcement. Do the state police use em sure do, but there are more towns and municipalities than state police by a large stretch hence it is not really a radar state... Now go twisty some more words around since you dont understand. You invoke a PR department's marketing strategy and permit it to define legalities for you,,,and tell another they don't understand the law. Great show! |
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:44:32 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote: But nowhere does it state that any grace is given when the speed measuring device is mechanical or electrical, as per paragraph (1). So if they are using a paragraph (1) device then they CAN bust you for doing 56 in a 55 zone. Yes, but none of the police that I'm aware of use any methods other than ELECTRONIC means. RADAR and VASCAR, as well as the old tape strips across the road (which have all but disappeared) are all considered electronic devices. Once again, you demonstrate, to people with normal comprehensive ability, that you can't understand what you read. It's no wonder you jump to the wrong conclusions over and over again in the scant 4 years that you have been polluting this newsgroup. Your pattern of habitual incomprehension is all the more apparent if one walks through Google for a few minutes. This is my last word on the subject. Only because you have been proven wrong and you can't admit it. Unless you can come up with a "mechanical" or simple electrical speed measuring device in common use in Pa., then you can't prove that I'm wrong. You are attempting to disprove the majority of cases, by citing a small exception. Dave "Sandbagger" |
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:35:08 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote in : On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:44:32 -0800, Frank Gilliland wrote: But nowhere does it state that any grace is given when the speed measuring device is mechanical or electrical, as per paragraph (1). So if they are using a paragraph (1) device then they CAN bust you for doing 56 in a 55 zone. Yes, Then your statement was wrong. Apology accepted. but "but" nothing. You didn't qualify your statement until after is was proven wrong. Changing your tune after getting caught doesn't negate the fact that you were wrong and can't admit it. none of the police that I'm aware of use any methods other than ELECTRONIC means. RADAR and VASCAR, as well as the old tape strips across the road (which have all but disappeared) are all considered electronic devices. So because -you- aren't aware of any such methods that means they don't exist? Gee, another conclusion based on absense of proof. Once again, you demonstrate, to people with normal comprehensive ability, that you can't understand what you read. It's no wonder you jump to the wrong conclusions over and over again in the scant 4 years that you have been polluting this newsgroup. Your pattern of habitual incomprehension is all the more apparent if one walks through Google for a few minutes. This is my last word on the subject. Only because you have been proven wrong and you can't admit it. Unless you can come up with a "mechanical" or simple electrical speed measuring device in common use in Pa., then you can't prove that I'm wrong. You are attempting to disprove the majority of cases, by citing a small exception. A car speedometer can be a mechanical device used for measuring speed. And pacing a speeder is probably the simplest, easiest, most reliable and most widely used method of catching speeders. That's hardly a "small exception". And I'm sure that there are other devices that fall into the category of paragraph (1) or they would have limited the paragraph to just speedometers. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong. A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11821-4214AD53- : Now you are back-pedaling with "Pa is not REALLY a radar state". LMAO, Again,,if it was a non-radar state, radar would not be implemented by the authorities. In fact, you are the only one I have ever heard ue the term "non-radar" state when the state does in fact, use radar. Can you cite a single source where you took this phrase from? Perhaps a link or provide for it? Of course you can't, Dave, it;s why you are lending support to yourself. I took this right from a radar manufacturers meeting room, I was there. Heard it first hand. If you are not on a state highway you will never recieve a speeding ticket from radar? Why because Penns is not really a radar enforcement state, it is not thier primary means of speed enforcement. I am speaking of the state in general now go **** yourself dave McCampbell Is that why bird dogs are illegal in PA, the state owns that revenue? -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong. A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me...... Dave "Sandbagger" |
Dave Hall wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong. A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me...... George posts as you. -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote in message ... (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11821-4214AD53- : Now you are back-pedaling with "Pa is not REALLY a radar state". LMAO, Again,,if it was a non-radar state, radar would not be implemented by the authorities. In fact, you are the only one I have ever heard ue the term "non-radar" state when the state does in fact, use radar. Can you cite a single source where you took this phrase from? Perhaps a link or provide for it? Of course you can't, Dave, it;s why you are lending support to yourself. I took this right from a radar manufacturers meeting room, I was there. Staring down the waveguides and pushing the buttons. Heard it first hand. If you are not on a state highway you will never recieve a speeding ticket from radar? Why because Penns is not really a radar enforcement state, it is not thier primary means of speed enforcement. I am speaking of the state in general now go **** yourself dave McCampbell |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11822-4214B65C-63 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: helicopter. Called a bear-in-the-air. Of course, if you left the cave of despair once every few years, you would be clued in. Yeah, bear in the Air went out with the smokies in 1976 after the realease of Convoy. so did traffic enforcement with helicopters. Crash the gate doin' 98. -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: Steveo wrote in : Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? I am in a related field to the subject in question. It seems like you're up to date on such things. Thats why it is funny as a fart in a space suit to watch twisty try to tell me what i mean and what is reality all this from 1800 miles away. In this case it's common sense. No gives a 1 mph speeding ticket, not even in a school zone. -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
On 17 Feb 2005 19:51:34 GMT, Steveo wrote in
: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Steveo wrote in : Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? I am in a related field to the subject in question. It seems like you're up to date on such things. Thats why it is funny as a fart in a space suit to watch twisty try to tell me what i mean and what is reality all this from 1800 miles away. In this case it's common sense. No gives a 1 mph speeding ticket, not even in a school zone. They do some smaller speed-traps here in WA. I can't remember if it was Bellingham or Chelan, but one of those two towns has speed boards in the school zones, and you better be driving -under- the speed limit or they'll pull you over. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 19:51:34 GMT, Steveo wrote in : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Steveo wrote in : Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? I am in a related field to the subject in question. It seems like you're up to date on such things. Thats why it is funny as a fart in a space suit to watch twisty try to tell me what i mean and what is reality all this from 1800 miles away. In this case it's common sense. No one gives a 1 mph speeding ticket, not even in a school zone. They do some smaller speed-traps here in WA. I can't remember if it was Bellingham or Chelan, but one of those two towns has speed boards in the school zones, and you better be driving -under- the speed limit or they'll pull you over. Man, I'd take a 1 mph speeding ticket to court every time, wouldn't you? I'd lay odds on me getting it tossed, and the cop being bitched out by the magistrate too. -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:26:36 -0600, itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote in : Frank Gilliland wrote in : They do some smaller speed-traps here in WA. I can't remember if it was Bellingham or Chelan, but one of those two towns has speed boards in the school zones, and you better be driving -under- the speed limit or they'll pull you over. Frank do you mean the trailer type of speed board? or Pole mounted?? I can see a gung ho cop pulling you over in a school zone, they don't need radar to pull you over. A trained officer can estimate your speed, he get's what is called a tracking history where he visually sites you, for a period of time then confirms this with the radar. As stated though speeding tickets are almsot always pled down to non point related fine. Most cops can write you for many things that will stick, 1 or 2 mph over won't be one of them. I don't know..... I've driven through a lot of small towns and some of them are real anal about anyone breaking their local ordinances. Some places even have signs under the speed limit marker saying "Strictly Enforced", and around these parts that's usually the truth. Even Spokane has "emphasis patrols" that they publicize on the news -before- the fact just to give people warning, but they end up writing gobs of tickets anyway. So as far as I'm concerned, if the speed limit is 55 I'll stay below it so there won't be any doubt. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frank Gilliland wrote:
So as far as I'm concerned, if the speed limit is 55 I'll stay below it so there won't be any doubt. If you go ahead and do 58 Frank, I won't tell anyone. :) -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: Steveo wrote in news:20050217155252.866 : Frank Gilliland wrote: So as far as I'm concerned, if the speed limit is 55 I'll stay below it so there won't be any doubt. If you go ahead and do 58 Frank, I won't tell anyone. :) Posted by: Patrick on June 5, 2004 03:09 PM C.A. Would you agree that you are breaking the law if you exceed 70 mph on the interstate? Who dat? -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
"Steveo" wrote in message ... Frank Gilliland wrote: On 17 Feb 2005 19:51:34 GMT, Steveo wrote in : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Steveo wrote in : Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? I am in a related field to the subject in question. It seems like you're up to date on such things. Thats why it is funny as a fart in a space suit to watch twisty try to tell me what i mean and what is reality all this from 1800 miles away. In this case it's common sense. No one gives a 1 mph speeding ticket, not even in a school zone. They do some smaller speed-traps here in WA. I can't remember if it was Bellingham or Chelan, but one of those two towns has speed boards in the school zones, and you better be driving -under- the speed limit or they'll pull you over. Man, I'd take a 1 mph speeding ticket to court every time, wouldn't you? I'd lay odds on me getting it tossed, and the cop being bitched out by the magistrate too. Oh, it almost would be tossed, but how much time did you spend? How much pay did you lose? It all adds up, that's the reason an A-hole cop would write you a ticket like that. Landshark -- Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen. |
"Steveo" wrote in message ... itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11821-4214AD53- : Now you are back-pedaling with "Pa is not REALLY a radar state". LMAO, Again,,if it was a non-radar state, radar would not be implemented by the authorities. In fact, you are the only one I have ever heard ue the term "non-radar" state when the state does in fact, use radar. Can you cite a single source where you took this phrase from? Perhaps a link or provide for it? Of course you can't, Dave, it;s why you are lending support to yourself. I took this right from a radar manufacturers meeting room, I was there. Heard it first hand. If you are not on a state highway you will never recieve a speeding ticket from radar? Why because Penns is not really a radar enforcement state, it is not thier primary means of speed enforcement. I am speaking of the state in general now go **** yourself dave McCampbell Is that why bird dogs are illegal in PA, the state owns that revenue? LOL!!! Landshark -- The world is good-natured to people who are good natured. |
"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message ... Frank Gilliland wrote: On 17 Feb 2005 19:51:34 GMT, Steveo wrote in : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Steveo wrote in : Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? I am in a related field to the subject in question. It seems like you're up to date on such things. Thats why it is funny as a fart in a space suit to watch twisty try to tell me what i mean and what is reality all this from 1800 miles away. In this case it's common sense. No one gives a 1 mph speeding ticket, not even in a school zone. They do some smaller speed-traps here in WA. I can't remember if it was Bellingham or Chelan, but one of those two towns has speed boards in the school zones, and you better be driving -under- the speed limit or they'll pull you over. Man, I'd take a 1 mph speeding ticket to court every time, wouldn't you? I'd lay odds on me getting it tossed, and the cop being bitched out by the magistrate too. Oh, it almost would be tossed, but how much time did you spend? How much pay did you lose? It all adds up, that's the reason an A-hole cop would write you a ticket like that. Landshark I'll ask you the same question, Shark. Ever know anyone that's got a 1 mph speeding ticket? -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
On 17 Feb 2005 20:52:52 GMT, Steveo wrote in
: Frank Gilliland wrote: So as far as I'm concerned, if the speed limit is 55 I'll stay below it so there won't be any doubt. If you go ahead and do 58 Frank, I won't tell anyone. :) Is that a "don't ask, don't tell" policy? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 20:52:52 GMT, Steveo wrote in : Frank Gilliland wrote: So as far as I'm concerned, if the speed limit is 55 I'll stay below it so there won't be any doubt. If you go ahead and do 58 Frank, I won't tell anyone. :) Is that a "don't ask, don't tell" policy? Yep, that's the ticket..err -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong. A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. (Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania) LOL..invoking a marketiing ploy and citing it as a source of reference for the law is entertaining, nothing more. (Is that what you do for a living, George? ) Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me...... Yep, right after "Geo" forged you and said you gave him permission to do so in email in order to pollute the group. I am not the first to note your behavior outside this group hinges on myself. You need a real life, David. David T. Hall Jr. N3CVJ "Sandbagger" |
NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:35pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure From: =A0=A0 itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:35pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0 sv3-HC1j8Vv/jVwPzcgvGIf+b0vP7PFV6/KwoBnKRsF1V9GieDDdXBHsVNFgQXoJGT84ZPLR6L= dGRVIgS2h!fcpRNHi0Vir7r9bxfyBjiPBo0BsCh+AwlJZYLdiU wOC2M8xLOhUM7+NDwmt87cqb= JCno X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31 (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11822-4214B65C-63 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: helicopter. Called a bear-in-the-air. Of course, if you left the cave of despair once every few years, you would be clued in. Yeah, bear in the Air went out with the smokies in 1976 after the realease of Convoy. so did traffic enforcement with helicopters. Just like David Hall Jr., you are stuck in a time warp. Your ignorance is limited by your own personal experiences. |
NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:40pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure From: =A0=A0 itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:40pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0 sv3-hg3z8lBKhgZgcJIsqEK3KwOIGYxDBvVVDQQ0SCFqIbLfwGgu1U yjT6sU7Hwh2fxdQWRXuC= 1hZacPTqR!a7fOi9j7UcJ3orlgK0hxdBT9aI/MOeEsSi7n++74BaKrdbnTzA/70ZXzcePGZLKZ= wT/v X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31 Steveo wrote in news:20050217132915.019 : Dave Hall wrote: On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: Pa is a non-radar state By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong. A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania So you not only cite a marketing team as your reference to the law, you insist on it remaining as such. (Is that what you do for a living, George?) Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me...... (shrug) You said yourself and David T. Hall Jr. conspired in email for you to forge him in this group, in order to have me think you are he. In addition to affirming how much I lord over you each of you, it also illustrates the both of you will use the group as your own personal toilet as a means to harass. (George posts as you. ) Only after tipsy called me Dave, That's no jusification. You called Frank me before any of this took place. Hypocrite. so lets see who am Both of you are blights to amateur radio. |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:43:12 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: NNTP-Posting-Date: ** Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:35pm (EST-1) Group: ** rec.radio.cb Subject: ** Help on SSB failure From: ** itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge User-Agent: ** Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: ** yes Date: ** Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:35pm (EST-1) X-Trace: ** sv3-HC1j8Vv/jVwPzcgvGIf+b0vP7PFV6/KwoBnKRsF1V9GieDDdXBHsVNFgQXoJGT84ZPLR6LdGRVIgS2h! fcpRNHi0Vir7r9bxfyBjiPBo0BsCh+AwlJZYLdiUwOC2M8xLOh UM7+NDwmt87cqbJCno X-Complaints-To: ** X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ** X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: ** Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: ** Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: ** 1.3.31 (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11822-4214B65C-63 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: helicopter. Called a bear-in-the-air. Of course, if you left the cave of despair once every few years, you would be clued in. Yeah, bear in the Air went out with the smokies in 1976 after the realease of Convoy. so did traffic enforcement with helicopters. Just like David Hall Jr., you are stuck in a time warp. Your ignorance is limited by your own personal experiences. Wait, I thought he WAS me? Make up your "mind". Dave "Sandbagger" |
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:40:43 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Dave*Hall) On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net: By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong. A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. (Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania) LOL..invoking a marketiing ploy and citing it as a source of reference for the law is entertaining, nothing more. (Is that what you do for a living, George? ) Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me...... Yep, right after "Geo" forged you and said you gave him permission to do so in email in order to pollute the group. I didn't give him "permission" He told me about it after the fact as a courtesy. But I didn't have a problem with it. Watching you chase your tail trying to figure out who is really who is entertaining enough. I am not the first to note your behavior outside this group hinges on myself. How would you (or anyone else here for that matter) know anything about my behavior outside this group? More self aggrandizing. You need a real life, David. I have one. And you're consumed with it. So who else am I today? Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:03:41 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Steveo) itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? -- * *******************************http://NewsReader.Com Geo works the batting cages at Chuckie Cheese? No, I do that. Er....... yeh.... Dave "Sandbagger" |
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (Steveo) itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Steveo wrote in : Is that what you do for a living, George? (I am in a related field to the subject in question. ) It seems like you're up to date on such things. (Thats why it is funny as a fart in a space suit to watch twisty try to tell me what i mean and what is reality all this from 1800 miles away. ) In this case it's common sense. No gives a 1 mph speeding ticket, not even in a school zone. I dunno know about that. Get in line for this question, Twist. Ever know anyone that got a 1mph speeding ticket? -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (Steveo) itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania Is that what you do for a living, George? Geo works the batting cages at Chuckie Cheese? D'oh! Pizza time theater. -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: Another Bold face Lie I never siad Dave gave me permission to do so, I told you I emailed him and told him what I was doing. Your obvously desperate to lie like you do. will you email and tell me before you use my name in your posts again? -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: Steveo wrote in news:20050218171541.744 : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Another Bold face Lie I never siad Dave gave me permission to do so, I told you I emailed him and told him what I was doing. Your obvously desperate to lie like you do. will you email and tell me before you use my name in your posts again? No why dont you grow some balls i will tell you to your face... show up I'll be in Dayton for two days in May. C'mon down for some real hospitality. You'll enjoy the hillbillies that are going with me too. g -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 11:49am (EST-1) From:
=A0=A0 Dave Hall Group: =A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 12:49pm Organization: =A0=A0 home.ptd.net/~n3cvj X-Trace: =A0=A0 sv3-BDDkdK/6co1HS8CI5K3aDHk8KVez56kq+RNoXrJZ7f/Fi4SfKflJXOaKKxQNHrSpo+GyhE= msxMy1eoJ!WBJVOUDBPwobswobmFmQMxc9E8Kxe5cxxBEBgr9y 9HvsRW58vsHlENdIlukTJ/QT= CQVP1V8qtjlx!oJJ8eJ1GJ/w=3D X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:40:43 -0500, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Dave=A0Hall) On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877: By whose standards? A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state is void of radar. (Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania) LOL..invoking a marketiing ploy and citing it as a source of reference for the law is entertaining, nothing more. (Is that what you do for a living, George? ) Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me...... Yep, right after "Geo" forged you and said you gave him permission to do so in email in order to pollute the group. I didn't give him "permission" He told me about it after the fact as a courtesy. You really don't have to explain yourself for my benefit, as it is you who is always struggling to redefine just what you meant to everyone, *after* you post something. But I didn't have a problem with it. And yet another electronic publishing of such a fact. Watching you chase your tail trying to figure out who is really who is entertaining enough. I am not the first to note your behavior outside this group hinges on myself. How would you (or anyone else here for that matter) know anything about my behavior outside this group? Statistical probability. Geo just told us about the email. Email is outside this group. More self aggrandizing. You're just mad because without the dx, I am more legal than yourself. You need a real life, David. I have one. Yet, you somehow feel compelled to tell the world how you consider peering into the personal lives of select usenet participants and making such your topic of choice in unrelated groups, a "hobby" of yours. The all-mesmerizing portion of such a claim, is in reality, you misinterpret such behavior as having a life. who am I today? The same person who has been shown he was wrong by the entire group, at one time or another. Most recently by myself, Frank, Bert Craig, Sideband, Landshark, and probably a few more I missed right off the top of your pointed little head. David T. Hall Jr, N3CVJ "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 4:09pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure From: =A0=A0 itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 4:09pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0 sv3-s5MR9iS42H5Rpju5wWx8QCqK1f8WHuQFo1J8iPGbqYJLjeeiS3 0OevVgfv4ZVXh/s9RQOC= /N2HLrtko!CGJ0x9GXSbvM9b1bUETSeseZYKePtm1TYjgpfZWbA d8MRQ6engujoMFS5JEoQKuU= JGel X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31 (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:6287-4216006E-1021 @storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net: So you not only cite a marketing team as your reference to the law, you insist on it remaining as such. I did not reference any marketing team's, Is your memory that poor? You invoked an un-named company that has a financial interest in marketing their product as an answer to my inquiry as to WHO told you that Pa. was a non-radar state, as you have claimed. If the PR department of that company didn't come up with the term and defninition, just what part of the company would you hazard, did? The janitor? nor was my reference regarding any law. As long as we understand each other that your un-named company applying their own definition to a "non-radar state" to include a state that indeed utilizes radar, is but a single person's opinion. It was a general comment and statement that is known throught the industry, I can accept the term is prevalent, but the definition can not encompasses states who do employ radar, no matter who claims it. Pa is not really a radar state, now you can sit here and try to decipher my meaning. Ha,,,now, it's not "really" a radar state. Off you go now, to redefine what you "really' meant when you said "Pa is not a radar state." You are a nobody, ur opinion and what you say doesn't matter. Tut-tut,,get over your personal anger that is the cause of so much vile and venom spewing forth from your thrashed psyche and twisted soul. I have spoken with more Leo agencies and people in the field who know what is what, Your personal experiences are irrelavant. you on the other hand is a usenet blowhard who's only goal is to get under peoples skin with your assinine replies. My goodness, coming from one who has called each and every participant in this group (except, for David T. Hall, Jr, of course) a homosexual at one time or another, your thoughts and warm wishes will certainly be filed appropriately. So how many more times will you call me dave Hall? How many more times will you forge him? you dumb jackass. The mother issue has you beside yourself. |
NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 4:59pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure From: =A0=A0 itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 4:59pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0 sv3-HisBmaR3wCudPMWR5A2QhKgISyf0O/Fhyndggi5CJATdB9tWcl/RVWUB4oaAOjum6C1zAZ= lakA4ktCx!NDgzjDDfJryt3yFMKvaXV7n2Om2XQmPSHxWGNPVt zB2MWN0E7Pmzx9ZiCw72kJfu= TjxK X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31 (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11821-4214AD53- : From: pam (itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge) (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:6288-4213CF9E-244 @storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net: most towns dont even have them Gee,,,that's because only State Cops are permitted to have them in Pa. Gee, then that makes pennsy not really a radar state Here you are redefining what you "really" meant. Now you are back-pedaling with "Pa is not REALLY a radar state". LMAO, Again,,if it was a non-radar state, radar would not be implemented by the authorities. In fact, you are the only one I have ever heard ue the term "non-radar" state when the state does in fact, use radar. Can you cite a single source where you took this phrase from? Perhaps a link or provide for it? Any idea how many tropers and police officers are in Pa, Ill bet one county in Florida alone has more radar than the whole state of PA. The Department has about 540 Decatur Genesis Handheld radar units. The Department also has about 250 other radar units made by a different manufacturer. http://www.psp.state.pa.us/psp/cwp/view.asp? A=3D3&Q=3D172084&tx=3D1 Absent is a date, or a reference to what department...it could be a single state polic department in any number of counties in Pa..but as an always trusting type guy, I'll go ahead and give you the benefit of the doubt and assume (against my better judgement) that the entire state police department of Pa has only the amount of radar detectors you claim. One would also assume, the department feels it adequate for the amount of roads they must cover, or they would have more, with all the money being poured into the coffers of domestic agencies, post-911. It all boils down to the state police department being equipped with radar, which results in claiming "Pa is a non-radar state", being incorrect. Now, surely you aren't going to invoke the (limited?) number of radar units in the state, as the criteria for determining your definition of a non-radar state,this late in the thread, are you? David T. Hall Jr. did the same exact thing when it was demonstrated he fails to abide by his own invoked criteria for determining what he holds as a federal criminal. Then again, several people have illustrated his failure to hold himself to his own standards. |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: Steveo wrote in : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Steveo wrote in news:20050218171541.744 : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Another Bold face Lie I never siad Dave gave me permission to do so, I told you I emailed him and told him what I was doing. Your obvously desperate to lie like you do. will you email and tell me before you use my name in your posts again? No why dont you grow some balls i will tell you to your face... show up I'll be in Dayton for two days in May. C'mon down for some real hospitality. You'll enjoy the hillbillies that are going with me too. g Yeah your wife and kids are kinda fugly I hear. Come on to the Buckeye in May. I'll buy you a beer at my campsite of you don't act a fool. -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote: Steveo wrote in news:20050218221355.367 : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Steveo wrote in : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Steveo wrote in news:20050218171541.744 : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: Another Bold face Lie I never siad Dave gave me permission to do so, I told you I emailed him and told him what I was doing. Your obvously desperate to lie like you do. will you email and tell me before you use my name in your posts again? No why dont you grow some balls i will tell you to your face... show up I'll be in Dayton for two days in May. C'mon down for some real hospitality. You'll enjoy the hillbillies that are going with me too. g Yeah your wife and kids are kinda fugly I hear. Come on to the Buckeye in May. I'll buy you a beer at my campsite of you don't act a fool. Nah sorry Steve I see how you really are, and how you act the fool. Well..we all know you'd never have the nerve to actually show up anyway. Thanks for the laffs. -- http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com