True GOP'ers and Conservatives Illustrate Bush Failures!
 

To view the entire article, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...CLE_ID=3D42987
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
----------------------------------------------
Democracies & double standards
By Patrick J. Buchanan
----------------------------------------------
Posted: February 23, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern

"Magnanimity in politics is not seldom the truest wisdom; and a great
empire and little minds go ill together," Edmund Burke admonished the
haughty rulers of the British Empire of his time.
Our American empire is suffering from a similar want of wisdom and
plenitude of the hubris that cost George III his 13 colonies.

Consider how this generation of politicians is undoing the great work of
Ronald Reagan. When Reagan took office in 1981, the Soviet Union of the
aging autocrat Leonid Brezhnev was an "evil empire" that stretched from
the Elbe to the Bering Sea with thousands of nuclear warheads targeted
on the United States. The Red Army had recently occupied Afghanistan,
and Moscow had established imperial outposts in the Middle East, Africa,
the Caribbean and Central America.


Yet, the year Reagan departed, 1989, the Soviet empire threw open its
prison gates, released the captive nations of Eastern Europe, then
peacefully dissolved itself and let 14 republics, many of which the
czars had ruled for centuries, become free and independent states.
Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin became strategic partners of American
presidents. For once communism had been exorcised from Russia, there was
no ideological, ethnic or territorial conflict between us. For we live
on different continents in hemispheres separated by the world's largest
oceans. Moreover, Russia belongs with the West. As Solzhenitzyn wrote,
Mother Russia was "the first captive nation."
Both of us also have a vital interest in balancing off a rising and
possibly revanchist China and resisting an Islamic fundamentalism that
seeks to drive Russia out of the Caucasus and America out of the Middle
East.


Thus, as there is no relationship more critical to the security of the
West than that between Washington and Moscow, it is with near-despair
that one reads the front-page story in the Washington Times: "Senators
Seek to Sanction Russia: Say Putin Acts Autocratically."
Who are the senators? They are those twin protectors and proctors of
global democracy, Joe Lieberman and John McCain, and they want Putin
sanctioned by having the world's industrial democracies, the G-8,
suspend Russia's membership, which would be an insult and humiliation.


Putin's crimes? Says McCain: "Mr. Putin has moved to eliminate the
popular election of 89 of Russia's regional governors, has cracked down
on independent media, continued his repression of business executives
who oppose his government and is reasserting the Kremlin's old-style
central control." Says McCain, "The coup is no longer creeping =96 it is
galloping."
But a question arises: Why are these internal matters of the Russian
republic any business of

John McCain's? Putin is the elected president of Russia. Who elected
McCain to anything outside of Arizona?


During our Civil War, Lincoln blockaded Southern ports without the
approval of Congress, suspended habeas corpus, sent troops to prevent a
free election in Maryland, sought to arrest Chief Justice Roger B.
Taney, shut down newspapers, shot down rioters on the streets of New
York and made himself dictator of the Union. Was that any business of
the members of Britain's House of Lords? Just who do we Americans think
we are?


Whether Russia's governors are elected or appointed is none of our
business. As for the jailing of oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, or any of
the others in that den of thieves, that is no more our concern than TR's
smashing of the trusts or Truman's seizure of the coal mines or Bush's
incarceration of Martha Stewart was or is any of Russia's business. As
for President Putin acting "autocratically," can Sen. McCain recall when
Russian rulers have acted any other way?


Why are McCain and Lieberman bullyragging Russia but not China? After
all, Putin was elected, but Hu Jintao was not. Russia has an elected
legislature with opposition parties. China has never held a free
election. The Russian people have freedom of religion. China persecutes
Christians. Russia threatens no U.S. ally. China threatens Taiwan. In a
recent issue of Parade, a list was drawn up of the world's 10 worst
dictators based on their human-rights violations. Hu Jintao was fourth
from the top. Putin was not even mentioned.


If Russia is to be insulted by being kicked out of the G-8, why not
adopt a single standard and remove Most Favored Nation trade status from
China, which enabled her to run up a $160 billion trade surplus last
year at our expense?
Since Reagan achieved the rapprochement with Russia, the United States
has pushed NATO up to her borders, bombed her ally Serbia for 78 days,
interfered in elections in Georgia, Ukraine and Belarus, and begun a
pipeline to cut Moscow out of the Caspian oil trade.


Now, Russia is now going her own way: selling SAMs to Syria, AK-47s to
Venezuela, missiles and fighter aircraft to China and aiding Iran in
completing its first nuclear power plant.
Of this generation of leaders, it may be said in epitaph: They were too
small to see the larger world. They frittered away in a decade what
others had won in a half-century of perseverance in the Cold War.
=A9 2005

YAWN...




"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
...
To view the entire article, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=42987
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
----------------------------------------------
Democracies & double standards
By Patrick J. Buchanan
----------------------------------------------
Posted: February 23, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern

"Magnanimity in politics is not seldom the truest wisdom; and a great
empire and little minds go ill together," Edmund Burke admonished the
haughty rulers of the British Empire of his time.
Our American empire is suffering from a similar want of wisdom and
plenitude of the hubris that cost George III his 13 colonies.

Consider how this generation of politicians is undoing the great work of
Ronald Reagan. When Reagan took office in 1981, the Soviet Union of the
aging autocrat Leonid Brezhnev was an "evil empire" that stretched from
the Elbe to the Bering Sea with thousands of nuclear warheads targeted
on the United States. The Red Army had recently occupied Afghanistan,
and Moscow had established imperial outposts in the Middle East, Africa,
the Caribbean and Central America.


Yet, the year Reagan departed, 1989, the Soviet empire threw open its
prison gates, released the captive nations of Eastern Europe, then
peacefully dissolved itself and let 14 republics, many of which the
czars had ruled for centuries, become free and independent states.
Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin became strategic partners of American
presidents. For once communism had been exorcised from Russia, there was
no ideological, ethnic or territorial conflict between us. For we live
on different continents in hemispheres separated by the world's largest
oceans. Moreover, Russia belongs with the West. As Solzhenitzyn wrote,
Mother Russia was "the first captive nation."
Both of us also have a vital interest in balancing off a rising and
possibly revanchist China and resisting an Islamic fundamentalism that
seeks to drive Russia out of the Caucasus and America out of the Middle
East.


Thus, as there is no relationship more critical to the security of the
West than that between Washington and Moscow, it is with near-despair
that one reads the front-page story in the Washington Times: "Senators
Seek to Sanction Russia: Say Putin Acts Autocratically."
Who are the senators? They are those twin protectors and proctors of
global democracy, Joe Lieberman and John McCain, and they want Putin
sanctioned by having the world's industrial democracies, the G-8,
suspend Russia's membership, which would be an insult and humiliation.


Putin's crimes? Says McCain: "Mr. Putin has moved to eliminate the
popular election of 89 of Russia's regional governors, has cracked down
on independent media, continued his repression of business executives
who oppose his government and is reasserting the Kremlin's old-style
central control." Says McCain, "The coup is no longer creeping - it is
galloping."
But a question arises: Why are these internal matters of the Russian
republic any business of

John McCain's? Putin is the elected president of Russia. Who elected
McCain to anything outside of Arizona?


During our Civil War, Lincoln blockaded Southern ports without the
approval of Congress, suspended habeas corpus, sent troops to prevent a
free election in Maryland, sought to arrest Chief Justice Roger B.
Taney, shut down newspapers, shot down rioters on the streets of New
York and made himself dictator of the Union. Was that any business of
the members of Britain's House of Lords? Just who do we Americans think
we are?


Whether Russia's governors are elected or appointed is none of our
business. As for the jailing of oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, or any of
the others in that den of thieves, that is no more our concern than TR's
smashing of the trusts or Truman's seizure of the coal mines or Bush's
incarceration of Martha Stewart was or is any of Russia's business. As
for President Putin acting "autocratically," can Sen. McCain recall when
Russian rulers have acted any other way?


Why are McCain and Lieberman bullyragging Russia but not China? After
all, Putin was elected, but Hu Jintao was not. Russia has an elected
legislature with opposition parties. China has never held a free
election. The Russian people have freedom of religion. China persecutes
Christians. Russia threatens no U.S. ally. China threatens Taiwan. In a
recent issue of Parade, a list was drawn up of the world's 10 worst
dictators based on their human-rights violations. Hu Jintao was fourth
from the top. Putin was not even mentioned.


If Russia is to be insulted by being kicked out of the G-8, why not
adopt a single standard and remove Most Favored Nation trade status from
China, which enabled her to run up a $160 billion trade surplus last
year at our expense?
Since Reagan achieved the rapprochement with Russia, the United States
has pushed NATO up to her borders, bombed her ally Serbia for 78 days,
interfered in elections in Georgia, Ukraine and Belarus, and begun a
pipeline to cut Moscow out of the Caspian oil trade.


Now, Russia is now going her own way: selling SAMs to Syria, AK-47s to
Venezuela, missiles and fighter aircraft to China and aiding Iran in
completing its first nuclear power plant.
Of this generation of leaders, it may be said in epitaph: They were too
small to see the larger world. They frittered away in a decade what
others had won in a half-century of perseverance in the Cold War.
© 2005

I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:
To view the entire article, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...CLE_ID=3D42987
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
----------------------------------------------
Democracies & double standards
By Patrick J. Buchanan
----------------------------------------------
Posted: February 23, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern

"Magnanimity in politics is not seldom the truest wisdom; and a great
empire and little minds go ill together," Edmund Burke admonished the
haughty rulers of the British Empire of his time.
Our American empire is suffering from a similar want of wisdom and
plenitude of the hubris that cost George III his 13 colonies.

Consider how this generation of politicians is undoing the great work
of
Ronald Reagan. When Reagan took office in 1981, the Soviet Union of
the
aging autocrat Leonid Brezhnev was an "evil empire" that stretched
from
the Elbe to the Bering Sea with thousands of nuclear warheads
targeted
on the United States. The Red Army had recently occupied Afghanistan,
and Moscow had established imperial outposts in the Middle East,
Africa,
the Caribbean and Central America.


Yet, the year Reagan departed, 1989, the Soviet empire threw open its
prison gates, released the captive nations of Eastern Europe, then
peacefully dissolved itself and let 14 republics, many of which the
czars had ruled for centuries, become free and independent states.
Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin became strategic partners of American
presidents. For once communism had been exorcised from Russia, there
was
no ideological, ethnic or territorial conflict between us. For we
live
on different continents in hemispheres separated by the world's
largest
oceans. Moreover, Russia belongs with the West. As Solzhenitzyn
wrote,
Mother Russia was "the first captive nation."
Both of us also have a vital interest in balancing off a rising and
possibly revanchist China and resisting an Islamic fundamentalism
that
seeks to drive Russia out of the Caucasus and America out of the
Middle
East.


Thus, as there is no relationship more critical to the security of
the
West than that between Washington and Moscow, it is with near-despair
that one reads the front-page story in the Washington Times:
"Senators
Seek to Sanction Russia: Say Putin Acts Autocratically."
Who are the senators? They are those twin protectors and proctors of
global democracy, Joe Lieberman and John McCain, and they want Putin
sanctioned by having the world's industrial democracies, the G-8,
suspend Russia's membership, which would be an insult and
humiliation.


Putin's crimes? Says McCain: "Mr. Putin has moved to eliminate the
popular election of 89 of Russia's regional governors, has cracked
down
on independent media, continued his repression of business executives
who oppose his government and is reasserting the Kremlin's old-style
central control." Says McCain, "The coup is no longer creeping - it
is
galloping."
But a question arises: Why are these internal matters of the Russian
republic any business of

John McCain's? Putin is the elected president of Russia. Who elected
McCain to anything outside of Arizona?


During our Civil War, Lincoln blockaded Southern ports without the
approval of Congress, suspended habeas corpus, sent troops to prevent
a
free election in Maryland, sought to arrest Chief Justice Roger B.
Taney, shut down newspapers, shot down rioters on the streets of New
York and made himself dictator of the Union. Was that any business of
the members of Britain's House of Lords? Just who do we Americans
think
we are?


Whether Russia's governors are elected or appointed is none of our
business. As for the jailing of oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, or any
of
the others in that den of thieves, that is no more our concern than
TR's
smashing of the trusts or Truman's seizure of the coal mines or
Bush's
incarceration of Martha Stewart was or is any of Russia's business.
As
for President Putin acting "autocratically," can Sen. McCain recall
when
Russian rulers have acted any other way?


Why are McCain and Lieberman bullyragging Russia but not China? After
all, Putin was elected, but Hu Jintao was not. Russia has an elected
legislature with opposition parties. China has never held a free
election. The Russian people have freedom of religion. China
persecutes
Christians. Russia threatens no U.S. ally. China threatens Taiwan. In
a
recent issue of Parade, a list was drawn up of the world's 10 worst
dictators based on their human-rights violations. Hu Jintao was
fourth
from the top. Putin was not even mentioned.


If Russia is to be insulted by being kicked out of the G-8, why not
adopt a single standard and remove Most Favored Nation trade status
from
China, which enabled her to run up a $160 billion trade surplus last
year at our expense?
Since Reagan achieved the rapprochement with Russia, the United
States
has pushed NATO up to her borders, bombed her ally Serbia for 78
days,
interfered in elections in Georgia, Ukraine and Belarus, and begun a
pipeline to cut Moscow out of the Caspian oil trade.


Now, Russia is now going her own way: selling SAMs to Syria, AK-47s
to
Venezuela, missiles and fighter aircraft to China and aiding Iran in
completing its first nuclear power plant.
Of this generation of leaders, it may be said in epitaph: They were
too
small to see the larger world. They frittered away in a decade what
others had won in a half-century of perseverance in the Cold War.
=A9 2005

Not only are you copy/pasting the writings of a fellow idiot, you again
prove that you cannot do anything BUT copy/paste. An original thought
in your head would die in the empty mental landscape.

Go back to killing puppies and using kittens as fish bait, you sawed
off sissified FUGGLY pimper.

"Psychiatrist to keyclowns" wrote in message
oups.com...

I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:
To view the entire article, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=42987
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
----------------------------------------------
Democracies & double standards
By Patrick J. Buchanan
----------------------------------------------
Posted: February 23, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern

"Magnanimity in politics is not seldom the truest wisdom; and a great
empire and little minds go ill together," Edmund Burke admonished the
haughty rulers of the British Empire of his time.
Our American empire is suffering from a similar want of wisdom and
plenitude of the hubris that cost George III his 13 colonies.

Consider how this generation of politicians is undoing the great work
of
Ronald Reagan. When Reagan took office in 1981, the Soviet Union of
the
aging autocrat Leonid Brezhnev was an "evil empire" that stretched
from
the Elbe to the Bering Sea with thousands of nuclear warheads
targeted
on the United States. The Red Army had recently occupied Afghanistan,
and Moscow had established imperial outposts in the Middle East,
Africa,
the Caribbean and Central America.


Yet, the year Reagan departed, 1989, the Soviet empire threw open its
prison gates, released the captive nations of Eastern Europe, then
peacefully dissolved itself and let 14 republics, many of which the
czars had ruled for centuries, become free and independent states.
Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin became strategic partners of American
presidents. For once communism had been exorcised from Russia, there
was
no ideological, ethnic or territorial conflict between us. For we
live
on different continents in hemispheres separated by the world's
largest
oceans. Moreover, Russia belongs with the West. As Solzhenitzyn
wrote,
Mother Russia was "the first captive nation."
Both of us also have a vital interest in balancing off a rising and
possibly revanchist China and resisting an Islamic fundamentalism
that
seeks to drive Russia out of the Caucasus and America out of the
Middle
East.


Thus, as there is no relationship more critical to the security of
the
West than that between Washington and Moscow, it is with near-despair
that one reads the front-page story in the Washington Times:
"Senators
Seek to Sanction Russia: Say Putin Acts Autocratically."
Who are the senators? They are those twin protectors and proctors of
global democracy, Joe Lieberman and John McCain, and they want Putin
sanctioned by having the world's industrial democracies, the G-8,
suspend Russia's membership, which would be an insult and
humiliation.


Putin's crimes? Says McCain: "Mr. Putin has moved to eliminate the
popular election of 89 of Russia's regional governors, has cracked
down
on independent media, continued his repression of business executives
who oppose his government and is reasserting the Kremlin's old-style
central control." Says McCain, "The coup is no longer creeping - it
is
galloping."
But a question arises: Why are these internal matters of the Russian
republic any business of

John McCain's? Putin is the elected president of Russia. Who elected
McCain to anything outside of Arizona?


During our Civil War, Lincoln blockaded Southern ports without the
approval of Congress, suspended habeas corpus, sent troops to prevent
a
free election in Maryland, sought to arrest Chief Justice Roger B.
Taney, shut down newspapers, shot down rioters on the streets of New
York and made himself dictator of the Union. Was that any business of
the members of Britain's House of Lords? Just who do we Americans
think
we are?


Whether Russia's governors are elected or appointed is none of our
business. As for the jailing of oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, or any
of
the others in that den of thieves, that is no more our concern than
TR's
smashing of the trusts or Truman's seizure of the coal mines or
Bush's
incarceration of Martha Stewart was or is any of Russia's business.
As
for President Putin acting "autocratically," can Sen. McCain recall
when
Russian rulers have acted any other way?


Why are McCain and Lieberman bullyragging Russia but not China? After
all, Putin was elected, but Hu Jintao was not. Russia has an elected
legislature with opposition parties. China has never held a free
election. The Russian people have freedom of religion. China
persecutes
Christians. Russia threatens no U.S. ally. China threatens Taiwan. In
a
recent issue of Parade, a list was drawn up of the world's 10 worst
dictators based on their human-rights violations. Hu Jintao was
fourth
from the top. Putin was not even mentioned.


If Russia is to be insulted by being kicked out of the G-8, why not
adopt a single standard and remove Most Favored Nation trade status
from
China, which enabled her to run up a $160 billion trade surplus last
year at our expense?
Since Reagan achieved the rapprochement with Russia, the United
States
has pushed NATO up to her borders, bombed her ally Serbia for 78
days,
interfered in elections in Georgia, Ukraine and Belarus, and begun a
pipeline to cut Moscow out of the Caspian oil trade.


Now, Russia is now going her own way: selling SAMs to Syria, AK-47s
to
Venezuela, missiles and fighter aircraft to China and aiding Iran in
completing its first nuclear power plant.
Of this generation of leaders, it may be said in epitaph: They were
too
small to see the larger world. They frittered away in a decade what
others had won in a half-century of perseverance in the Cold War.
© 2005

Not only are you copy/pasting the writings of a fellow idiot, you again
prove that you cannot do anything BUT copy/paste. An original thought
in your head would die in the empty mental landscape.

Go back to killing puppies and using kittens as fish bait, you sawed
off sissified FUGGLY pimper.

STFU, felon-boi!

U Know Who wrote:
"Psychiatrist to keyclowns" wrote in
message
oups.com...

I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:
To view the entire article, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...CLE_ID=3D42987
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
----------------------------------------------
Democracies & double standards
By Patrick J. Buchanan
----------------------------------------------
Posted: February 23, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern

"Magnanimity in politics is not seldom the truest wisdom; and a
great
empire and little minds go ill together," Edmund Burke admonished
the
haughty rulers of the British Empire of his time.
Our American empire is suffering from a similar want of wisdom and
plenitude of the hubris that cost George III his 13 colonies.

Consider how this generation of politicians is undoing the great
work
of
Ronald Reagan. When Reagan took office in 1981, the Soviet Union of
the
aging autocrat Leonid Brezhnev was an "evil empire" that stretched
from
the Elbe to the Bering Sea with thousands of nuclear warheads
targeted
on the United States. The Red Army had recently occupied
Afghanistan,
and Moscow had established imperial outposts in the Middle East,
Africa,
the Caribbean and Central America.


Yet, the year Reagan departed, 1989, the Soviet empire threw open
its
prison gates, released the captive nations of Eastern Europe, then
peacefully dissolved itself and let 14 republics, many of which the
czars had ruled for centuries, become free and independent states.
Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin became strategic partners of American
presidents. For once communism had been exorcised from Russia,
there
was
no ideological, ethnic or territorial conflict between us. For we
live
on different continents in hemispheres separated by the world's
largest
oceans. Moreover, Russia belongs with the West. As Solzhenitzyn
wrote,
Mother Russia was "the first captive nation."
Both of us also have a vital interest in balancing off a rising and
possibly revanchist China and resisting an Islamic fundamentalism
that
seeks to drive Russia out of the Caucasus and America out of the
Middle
East.


Thus, as there is no relationship more critical to the security of
the
West than that between Washington and Moscow, it is with
near-despair
that one reads the front-page story in the Washington Times:
"Senators
Seek to Sanction Russia: Say Putin Acts Autocratically."
Who are the senators? They are those twin protectors and proctors
of
global democracy, Joe Lieberman and John McCain, and they want
Putin
sanctioned by having the world's industrial democracies, the G-8,
suspend Russia's membership, which would be an insult and
humiliation.


Putin's crimes? Says McCain: "Mr. Putin has moved to eliminate the
popular election of 89 of Russia's regional governors, has cracked
down
on independent media, continued his repression of business
executives
who oppose his government and is reasserting the Kremlin's
old-style
central control." Says McCain, "The coup is no longer creeping - it
is
galloping."
But a question arises: Why are these internal matters of the
Russian
republic any business of

John McCain's? Putin is the elected president of Russia. Who
elected
McCain to anything outside of Arizona?


During our Civil War, Lincoln blockaded Southern ports without the
approval of Congress, suspended habeas corpus, sent troops to
prevent
a
free election in Maryland, sought to arrest Chief Justice Roger B.
Taney, shut down newspapers, shot down rioters on the streets of
New
York and made himself dictator of the Union. Was that any business
of
the members of Britain's House of Lords? Just who do we Americans
think
we are?


Whether Russia's governors are elected or appointed is none of our
business. As for the jailing of oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, or
any
of
the others in that den of thieves, that is no more our concern than
TR's
smashing of the trusts or Truman's seizure of the coal mines or
Bush's
incarceration of Martha Stewart was or is any of Russia's business.
As
for President Putin acting "autocratically," can Sen. McCain recall
when
Russian rulers have acted any other way?


Why are McCain and Lieberman bullyragging Russia but not China?
After
all, Putin was elected, but Hu Jintao was not. Russia has an
elected
legislature with opposition parties. China has never held a free
election. The Russian people have freedom of religion. China
persecutes
Christians. Russia threatens no U.S. ally. China threatens Taiwan.
In
a
recent issue of Parade, a list was drawn up of the world's 10 worst
dictators based on their human-rights violations. Hu Jintao was
fourth
from the top. Putin was not even mentioned.


If Russia is to be insulted by being kicked out of the G-8, why not
adopt a single standard and remove Most Favored Nation trade status
from
China, which enabled her to run up a $160 billion trade surplus
last
year at our expense?
Since Reagan achieved the rapprochement with Russia, the United
States
has pushed NATO up to her borders, bombed her ally Serbia for 78
days,
interfered in elections in Georgia, Ukraine and Belarus, and begun
a
pipeline to cut Moscow out of the Caspian oil trade.


Now, Russia is now going her own way: selling SAMs to Syria, AK-47s
to
Venezuela, missiles and fighter aircraft to China and aiding Iran
in
completing its first nuclear power plant.
Of this generation of leaders, it may be said in epitaph: They were
too
small to see the larger world. They frittered away in a decade what
others had won in a half-century of perseverance in the Cold War.
=A9 2005

Not only are you copy/pasting the writings of a fellow idiot, you
again
prove that you cannot do anything BUT copy/paste. An original thought
in your head would die in the empty mental landscape.

Go back to killing puppies and using kittens as fish bait, you sawed
off sissified FUGGLY pimper.
=20
STFU, felon-boi!

boy you just "crack" people up, doncha?

Wanted- a boy who is prepared to give all to his
Masters. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. Time
wasters will be ignored. If you think you have
what it takes, get in touch.


On 25 Feb 2005 05:47:48 -0800, "Psychiatrist to
keyclowns" wrote:


I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:
To view the entire article, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=42987
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
----------------------------------------------
Democracies & double standards
By Patrick J. Buchanan
----------------------------------------------
Posted: February 23, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern

"Magnanimity in politics is not seldom the truest wisdom; and a great
empire and little minds go ill together," Edmund Burke admonished the
haughty rulers of the British Empire of his time.
Our American empire is suffering from a similar want of wisdom and
plenitude of the hubris that cost George III his 13 colonies.

Consider how this generation of politicians is undoing the great work
of
Ronald Reagan. When Reagan took office in 1981, the Soviet Union of
the
aging autocrat Leonid Brezhnev was an "evil empire" that stretched
from
the Elbe to the Bering Sea with thousands of nuclear warheads
targeted
on the United States. The Red Army had recently occupied Afghanistan,
and Moscow had established imperial outposts in the Middle East,
Africa,
the Caribbean and Central America.


Yet, the year Reagan departed, 1989, the Soviet empire threw open its
prison gates, released the captive nations of Eastern Europe, then
peacefully dissolved itself and let 14 republics, many of which the
czars had ruled for centuries, become free and independent states.
Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin became strategic partners of American
presidents. For once communism had been exorcised from Russia, there
was
no ideological, ethnic or territorial conflict between us. For we
live
on different continents in hemispheres separated by the world's
largest
oceans. Moreover, Russia belongs with the West. As Solzhenitzyn
wrote,
Mother Russia was "the first captive nation."
Both of us also have a vital interest in balancing off a rising and
possibly revanchist China and resisting an Islamic fundamentalism
that
seeks to drive Russia out of the Caucasus and America out of the
Middle
East.


Thus, as there is no relationship more critical to the security of
the
West than that between Washington and Moscow, it is with near-despair
that one reads the front-page story in the Washington Times:
"Senators
Seek to Sanction Russia: Say Putin Acts Autocratically."
Who are the senators? They are those twin protectors and proctors of
global democracy, Joe Lieberman and John McCain, and they want Putin
sanctioned by having the world's industrial democracies, the G-8,
suspend Russia's membership, which would be an insult and
humiliation.


Putin's crimes? Says McCain: "Mr. Putin has moved to eliminate the
popular election of 89 of Russia's regional governors, has cracked
down
on independent media, continued his repression of business executives
who oppose his government and is reasserting the Kremlin's old-style
central control." Says McCain, "The coup is no longer creeping - it
is
galloping."
But a question arises: Why are these internal matters of the Russian
republic any business of

John McCain's? Putin is the elected president of Russia. Who elected
McCain to anything outside of Arizona?


During our Civil War, Lincoln blockaded Southern ports without the
approval of Congress, suspended habeas corpus, sent troops to prevent
a
free election in Maryland, sought to arrest Chief Justice Roger B.
Taney, shut down newspapers, shot down rioters on the streets of New
York and made himself dictator of the Union. Was that any business of
the members of Britain's House of Lords? Just who do we Americans
think
we are?


Whether Russia's governors are elected or appointed is none of our
business. As for the jailing of oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, or any
of
the others in that den of thieves, that is no more our concern than
TR's
smashing of the trusts or Truman's seizure of the coal mines or
Bush's
incarceration of Martha Stewart was or is any of Russia's business.
As
for President Putin acting "autocratically," can Sen. McCain recall
when
Russian rulers have acted any other way?


Why are McCain and Lieberman bullyragging Russia but not China? After
all, Putin was elected, but Hu Jintao was not. Russia has an elected
legislature with opposition parties. China has never held a free
election. The Russian people have freedom of religion. China
persecutes
Christians. Russia threatens no U.S. ally. China threatens Taiwan. In
a
recent issue of Parade, a list was drawn up of the world's 10 worst
dictators based on their human-rights violations. Hu Jintao was
fourth
from the top. Putin was not even mentioned.


If Russia is to be insulted by being kicked out of the G-8, why not
adopt a single standard and remove Most Favored Nation trade status
from
China, which enabled her to run up a $160 billion trade surplus last
year at our expense?
Since Reagan achieved the rapprochement with Russia, the United
States
has pushed NATO up to her borders, bombed her ally Serbia for 78
days,
interfered in elections in Georgia, Ukraine and Belarus, and begun a
pipeline to cut Moscow out of the Caspian oil trade.


Now, Russia is now going her own way: selling SAMs to Syria, AK-47s
to
Venezuela, missiles and fighter aircraft to China and aiding Iran in
completing its first nuclear power plant.
Of this generation of leaders, it may be said in epitaph: They were
too
small to see the larger world. They frittered away in a decade what
others had won in a half-century of perseverance in the Cold War.
© 2005

Not only are you copy/pasting the writings of a fellow idiot, you again
prove that you cannot do anything BUT copy/paste. An original thought
in your head would die in the empty mental landscape.

Go back to killing puppies and using kittens as fish bait, you sawed
off sissified FUGGLY pimper.

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On 25 Feb 2005 05:47:48 -0800, "Psychiatrist to
keyclowns" wrote:


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

KC8QJP KATHY LEE wrote:
begin 644 fuglydogiecloseup.JPG
[3769 bytes]
end

OMG! Where the hell did you find that?

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
KC8QJP KATHY LEE wrote:
begin 644 fuglydogiecloseup.JPG
[3769 bytes]
end

OMG! Where the hell did you find that?

Scary!

"U Know Who" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
KC8QJP KATHY LEE wrote:
begin 644 fuglydogiecloseup.JPG
[3769 bytes]
end

OMG! Where the hell did you find that?

Scary!

Indeed..'fugly dogie' is being kind.