Radio Gear For Sale
 

please see the link below...

http://members.kingston.net/na/radios.html

please see the link below...

http://members.kingston.net/na/radios.html




Reported to FCC

wrote:
please see the link below...

http://members.kingston.net/na/radios.html





Reported to FCC

WHY?

Sure it MAY be illegal to operate some of this equipment, in certain areas,
at certain frequencies, without a proper permit.
But the equipment itself is not illegal in any way.

"whoever" whoever@wherever wrote in message
...


wrote:
please see the link below...

http://members.kingston.net/na/radios.html





Reported to FCC

WHY?

non-certified CB transceivers and CB linear amplifiers are illegal to
sell, fool.

milhoussedss wrote:
Sure it MAY be illegal to operate some of this equipment, in certain
areas,
at certain frequencies, without a proper permit.
But the equipment itself is not illegal in any way.

"whoever" whoever@wherever wrote in message
...


wrote:
please see the link below...

http://members.kingston.net/na/radios.html





Reported to FCC

WHY?

CB operator charged under new city law

By KRISTIN GORDON,
The Eagle-Gazette Staff

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Complaints from a group of neighbors experiencing interference on
household
appliances from phones and TVs to baby monitors have resulted in a
court
case against a local citizens band radio operator.

James A. Disbennet, 48, 427 Harrison Ave., is charged with operating a
CB
radio exceeding 4 watts, a first-degree misdemeanor, and two counts of
operating a CB radio without certification, a fourth-degree
misdemeanor.
Disbennet, whose handle is "Sugar Bear," answered a summons in
Fairfield
County Municipal Court last Tuesday and was released on a recognizance
bond.

In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the U.S. to
pass
such an ordinance, allowing the city to enforce rules set by the
Federal
Communication Commission regulating the strength of CB radios, said
Assistant City Law Director Dave Trimmer.

According to the ordinance, the definition of CB radio "includes all
private, two-way, short-distance voice communications service for
personal
or business activities of the general public."

In January, local residents began to log feedback problems they
experienced,
Trimmer said. Noise was reported on Harrison, Fifth and Washington
avenues.

One woman had problems almost every time she used her telephone. She
said it
interfered with calls such as learning a family member was in the
hospital.

Another woman heard interference over a baby monitor she keeps near her
husband who suffered from a stroke. When she heard calls from a CB
radio
operator named "Sugar Bear" late at night, she would have to turn off
the
monitor so it wouldn't wake her husband.

"Complainants must have a log of the interference for a minimum of four
weeks and there has to be more than one complainant in order to file
charges," Trimmer said.

After a phone conversation with a woman on Harrison Avenue where he
could
hear interference himself, Trimmer went to the neighborhood to
investigate,
he said. He talked to a few individuals, including Disbennet, who said
he
was a CB radio operator but did not possess an amplifier to exceed the
lawful power output.

"It's a hobby," Trimmer said. "Sometimes these hobbies get in the way
of the
rights of the neighbors."

On April 10, Tim Deitz, assistant superintendent of the city's
Electrical,
Communications and Signals Department, used a relative signal strength
meter
in the 400 block of Harrison Avenue to determine where interference was
coming from. The signals he received came from Disbennet's home, which
had a
40- to 50-foot antenna attached to it.

A search warrant was performed the next day by Lancaster police, who
seized
four pieces of CB radio equipment worth more than $1,000 from
Disbennet's
home.

"We're obviously treading on new ground," said Scott Wood, Disbennet's
attorney. "He's not been given any type of option to defend himself.
This is
a big hobby for him, something he enjoys doing.

"It has him concerned, of course -- he could be facing jail time."

The maximum penalty for a first-degree misdemeanor is a $1,000 fine and
180
days in jail.

Wood also is concerned about the case, which he's just begun
investigating.

"It's obviously a very interesting case -- this is the first ordinance
of
its kind in the country," he said. "But apparently, this ordinance was
passed in August 2002 but was never published."

According to the ordinance, No. 30-02, it was passed by council Aug. 26
and
approved Aug. 28.

The city started looking into the problem nearly two years earlier
after
neighbors on Talmadge Avenue started having problems, Trimmer said. The
city
received a petition with 28 signatures and contacted the FCC repeatedly
about the problem of enforcement.

Well it states that those only worked on the 10 and 12 meter bands and
hadn't been modified, so they are legal to use on the ham bands if you
had the proper license, tard.

No I Am Not Him wrote:
non-certified CB transceivers and CB linear amplifiers are illegal to
sell, fool.

milhoussedss wrote:

Sure it MAY be illegal to operate some of this equipment, in certain

areas,

at certain frequencies, without a proper permit.
But the equipment itself is not illegal in any way.

"whoever" whoever@wherever wrote in message
...


wrote:

please see the link below...

http://members.kingston.net/na/radios.html





Reported to FCC

WHY?

AMERICAN...... who cares!


"No I Am Not Him" wrote in message
oups.com...



CB operator charged under new city law

By KRISTIN GORDON,
The Eagle-Gazette Staff

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Complaints from a group of neighbors experiencing interference on
household
appliances from phones and TVs to baby monitors have resulted in a
court
case against a local citizens band radio operator.

James A. Disbennet, 48, 427 Harrison Ave., is charged with operating a
CB
radio exceeding 4 watts, a first-degree misdemeanor, and two counts of
operating a CB radio without certification, a fourth-degree
misdemeanor.
Disbennet, whose handle is "Sugar Bear," answered a summons in
Fairfield
County Municipal Court last Tuesday and was released on a recognizance
bond.

In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the U.S. to
pass
such an ordinance, allowing the city to enforce rules set by the
Federal
Communication Commission regulating the strength of CB radios, said
Assistant City Law Director Dave Trimmer.

According to the ordinance, the definition of CB radio "includes all
private, two-way, short-distance voice communications service for
personal
or business activities of the general public."

In January, local residents began to log feedback problems they
experienced,
Trimmer said. Noise was reported on Harrison, Fifth and Washington
avenues.

One woman had problems almost every time she used her telephone. She
said it
interfered with calls such as learning a family member was in the
hospital.

Another woman heard interference over a baby monitor she keeps near
her
husband who suffered from a stroke. When she heard calls from a CB
radio
operator named "Sugar Bear" late at night, she would have to turn off
the
monitor so it wouldn't wake her husband.

"Complainants must have a log of the interference for a minimum of
four
weeks and there has to be more than one complainant in order to file
charges," Trimmer said.

After a phone conversation with a woman on Harrison Avenue where he
could
hear interference himself, Trimmer went to the neighborhood to
investigate,
he said. He talked to a few individuals, including Disbennet, who said
he
was a CB radio operator but did not possess an amplifier to exceed the
lawful power output.

"It's a hobby," Trimmer said. "Sometimes these hobbies get in the way
of the
rights of the neighbors."

On April 10, Tim Deitz, assistant superintendent of the city's
Electrical,
Communications and Signals Department, used a relative signal strength
meter
in the 400 block of Harrison Avenue to determine where interference
was
coming from. The signals he received came from Disbennet's home, which
had a
40- to 50-foot antenna attached to it.

A search warrant was performed the next day by Lancaster police, who
seized
four pieces of CB radio equipment worth more than $1,000 from
Disbennet's
home.

"We're obviously treading on new ground," said Scott Wood, Disbennet's
attorney. "He's not been given any type of option to defend himself.
This is
a big hobby for him, something he enjoys doing.

"It has him concerned, of course -- he could be facing jail time."

The maximum penalty for a first-degree misdemeanor is a $1,000 fine
and
180
days in jail.

Wood also is concerned about the case, which he's just begun
investigating.

"It's obviously a very interesting case -- this is the first ordinance
of
its kind in the country," he said. "But apparently, this ordinance was
passed in August 2002 but was never published."

According to the ordinance, No. 30-02, it was passed by council Aug.
26
and
approved Aug. 28.

The city started looking into the problem nearly two years earlier
after
neighbors on Talmadge Avenue started having problems, Trimmer said.
The
city
received a petition with 28 signatures and contacted the FCC
repeatedly
about the problem of enforcement.

QUOTE"In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the U.S. to
pass"UNQUOTE. Hey moron, this is CANADA. We are the country ONTOP of the
USA. If this were prison, the Americans would be our bitches!!!!



"No I Am Not Him" wrote in message
oups.com...



CB operator charged under new city law

By KRISTIN GORDON,
The Eagle-Gazette Staff

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Complaints from a group of neighbors experiencing interference on
household
appliances from phones and TVs to baby monitors have resulted in a
court
case against a local citizens band radio operator.

James A. Disbennet, 48, 427 Harrison Ave., is charged with operating a
CB
radio exceeding 4 watts, a first-degree misdemeanor, and two counts of
operating a CB radio without certification, a fourth-degree
misdemeanor.
Disbennet, whose handle is "Sugar Bear," answered a summons in
Fairfield
County Municipal Court last Tuesday and was released on a recognizance
bond.

In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the U.S. to
pass
such an ordinance, allowing the city to enforce rules set by the
Federal
Communication Commission regulating the strength of CB radios, said
Assistant City Law Director Dave Trimmer.

According to the ordinance, the definition of CB radio "includes all
private, two-way, short-distance voice communications service for
personal
or business activities of the general public."

In January, local residents began to log feedback problems they
experienced,
Trimmer said. Noise was reported on Harrison, Fifth and Washington
avenues.

One woman had problems almost every time she used her telephone. She
said it
interfered with calls such as learning a family member was in the
hospital.

Another woman heard interference over a baby monitor she keeps near her
husband who suffered from a stroke. When she heard calls from a CB
radio
operator named "Sugar Bear" late at night, she would have to turn off
the
monitor so it wouldn't wake her husband.

"Complainants must have a log of the interference for a minimum of four
weeks and there has to be more than one complainant in order to file
charges," Trimmer said.

After a phone conversation with a woman on Harrison Avenue where he
could
hear interference himself, Trimmer went to the neighborhood to
investigate,
he said. He talked to a few individuals, including Disbennet, who said
he
was a CB radio operator but did not possess an amplifier to exceed the
lawful power output.

"It's a hobby," Trimmer said. "Sometimes these hobbies get in the way
of the
rights of the neighbors."

On April 10, Tim Deitz, assistant superintendent of the city's
Electrical,
Communications and Signals Department, used a relative signal strength
meter
in the 400 block of Harrison Avenue to determine where interference was
coming from. The signals he received came from Disbennet's home, which
had a
40- to 50-foot antenna attached to it.

A search warrant was performed the next day by Lancaster police, who
seized
four pieces of CB radio equipment worth more than $1,000 from
Disbennet's
home.

"We're obviously treading on new ground," said Scott Wood, Disbennet's
attorney. "He's not been given any type of option to defend himself.
This is
a big hobby for him, something he enjoys doing.

"It has him concerned, of course -- he could be facing jail time."

The maximum penalty for a first-degree misdemeanor is a $1,000 fine and
180
days in jail.

Wood also is concerned about the case, which he's just begun
investigating.

"It's obviously a very interesting case -- this is the first ordinance
of
its kind in the country," he said. "But apparently, this ordinance was
passed in August 2002 but was never published."

According to the ordinance, No. 30-02, it was passed by council Aug. 26
and
approved Aug. 28.

The city started looking into the problem nearly two years earlier
after
neighbors on Talmadge Avenue started having problems, Trimmer said. The
city
received a petition with 28 signatures and contacted the FCC repeatedly
about the problem of enforcement.

guess wrote:

QUOTE"In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the U.S. to
pass"UNQUOTE. Hey moron, this is CANADA. We are the country ONTOP of the
USA. If this were prison, the Americans would be our bitches!!!!

And if this were a house, you'd be livin in the attic..

----------------------------------------------------------------
I am BillGatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assim
[General Protection Fault]

Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC wrote:

guess wrote:


QUOTE"In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the U.S. to
pass"UNQUOTE. Hey moron, this is CANADA. We are the country ONTOP of the
USA. If this were prison, the Americans would be our bitches!!!!



And if this were a house, you'd be livin in the attic..

----------------------------------------------------------------
I am BillGatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assim
[General Protection Fault]


No wonder it is so drafty and cold ;-)

Adios

NO, you'd be in the basement, and we'd be in the spacious first level where
the jacuzzi and the hot tub are!!


"Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC" wrote in
message ...
guess wrote:

QUOTE"In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the U.S. to
pass"UNQUOTE. Hey moron, this is CANADA. We are the country ONTOP of the
USA. If this were prison, the Americans would be our bitches!!!!

And if this were a house, you'd be livin in the attic..

----------------------------------------------------------------
I am BillGatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assim
[General Protection Fault]

No, the Mexicans would be in the basement and the Americans would be on
the main floor.
The Americans would be out cutting all the neighbor's lawns for their
own profit, and when no one was looking they would be stealing from
neighbor's mailboxes.
All the while the Americans would be ****ed off at us, because we're not
watching for when the neighbors start throwing fire bombs at the main
floor.


"guess" wrote in message news:1109819700.637614@news...
NO, you'd be in the basement, and we'd be in the spacious first level
where the jacuzzi and the hot tub are!!


"Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC" wrote
in message ...
guess wrote:

QUOTE"In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the
U.S. to
pass"UNQUOTE. Hey moron, this is CANADA. We are the country ONTOP of
the
USA. If this were prison, the Americans would be our bitches!!!!

And if this were a house, you'd be livin in the attic..

----------------------------------------------------------------
I am BillGatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assim
[General Protection Fault]

guess wrote:

NO, you'd be in the basement, and we'd be in the spacious first level where
the jacuzzi and the hot tub are!!

A house with no attic/roof? dont think so

"Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC" wrote in
message ...
guess wrote:

QUOTE"In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the U.S. to
pass"UNQUOTE. Hey moron, this is CANADA. We are the country ONTOP of the
USA. If this were prison, the Americans would be our bitches!!!!

And if this were a house, you'd be livin in the attic..

----------------------------------------------------------------
I am BillGatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assim
[General Protection Fault]

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

BigScaryBob wrote:

No, the Mexicans would be in the basement and the Americans would be on
the main floor.

Still not possible, no attic/roof.

The Americans would be out cutting all the neighbor's lawns for their
own profit, and when no one was looking they would be stealing from
neighbor's mailboxes.

the mexicans would be eating the candians, 'taste like chicken tacos..

All the while the Americans would be ****ed off at us, because we're not
watching for when the neighbors start throwing fire bombs at the main
floor.

canadians would be away playing hockey

"guess" wrote in message news:1109819700.637614@news...
NO, you'd be in the basement, and we'd be in the spacious first level
where the jacuzzi and the hot tub are!!


"Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC" wrote
in message ...
guess wrote:

QUOTE"In August 2002, Lancaster City Council was the first in the
U.S. to
pass"UNQUOTE. Hey moron, this is CANADA. We are the country ONTOP of
the
USA. If this were prison, the Americans would be our bitches!!!!

And if this were a house, you'd be livin in the attic..

----------------------------------------------------------------
I am BillGatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assim
[General Protection Fault]



--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:53:30 -0500, whoever whoever@wherever wrote:

Well it states that those only worked on the 10 and 12 meter bands and
hadn't been modified, so they are legal to use on the ham bands if you
had the proper license, tard.

No I Am Not Him wrote:
non-certified CB transceivers and CB linear amplifiers are illegal to
sell, fool.


He listed them as Ham, disp****.

Vinnie S.

Vinnie S. wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:53:30 -0500, whoever whoever@wherever wrote:

Well it states that those only worked on the 10 and 12 meter bands
and
hadn't been modified, so they are legal to use on the ham bands if
you
had the proper license, tard.

No I Am Not Him wrote:
non-certified CB transceivers and CB linear amplifiers are illegal
to
sell, fool.


He listed them as Ham, disp****.

Vinnie S.

So you can sell a non type accepted cb if you list it as "ham"? where
do you see that rule????