About Us

May 25th 05, 04:05 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 25 May 2005 00:12:35 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 May 2005 10:37:09 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
How many links do you need, Dave?

Just one good and accurate one would be

nice, but you haven't posted any.

You've been given several and like it has been correctly observed, you
dismiss all of them as a conspiracy of the left.

Just snippets of your own out of context

interpretations of some biased, agenda-driven

news report.

There were no interpretations, only cut and pastes, but the content so
vehemently opposed what you say, it is perfectly understandable that
soneone of your intellect level would take such as being rewritten in
order to preserve your almost always wrong positions.

Post the whole link, you know, something that

begins with "http://", so we can all read it.

I already did. Your **** poor memory is stringing you along and forcing
you to wear the "kick me" sign again.

David T. Hall Jr.

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

(Hello, Dave
Since being in contact with a few friends who are so severely on the
extreme right, I have found the best way to get news is *outside* of the
United States. Whatever article is written here, it is dismissed as work
of the demonic liberal left.)

There is a great deal of truth in that.

Yep,,and it's you doing all the dismissing.

The major news media has been infiltrated, as
have much of academia,

And the WH merely makes up junk and presents it as news, an issue you
know you can not touch, as it defeats your position and ilustrates your
hypocrisy, as you accept such behavior when commited by your party.
Frank defeated your position and illustrated your hypocrisy by astutely
showing several key areas where you refuse to apply your own set of
standards when the outcome is not favorable to your personal views.

with the followers of left leaning politics. This

has been going on in ernest since the 60's and
the Vietnam war, when it was realized that the
only way for a small political minority to win

their objective of large scale governmental

reform, was from within through slow, careful

indoctrination and propaganda.

That was called "Trcikle down" and it failed miserably.

The two best places to achieve that goal are in
the agencies which bring us the news, and the
institutions which educate our impressionable

young.

LMAO,,,now you have a problem with the educational system in that they
have a secret agenda with "indoctrination of the young" and
"propaganda". You should write for Dr. Who, but onlyafter you go to
college and learn a few things.

It had been working fairly well,

For example...

until the advent

of the internet, talk radio, and independent

news services such as Fox News.

Bull****. Reagan was elected for eight years during that time span,
illustrating just the opposite of your warblings.

The ability to cross check the news and parse

out the spin, essentially put the spotlight on

the mainstream news media, and people like

Dan Rather and Jayson Blair.

But those WH deliberate false press releases
are perfectly acceptable. What a card!

Exposure of such radical leftists in teaching

roles such as Ward Churchill,

Or Tom Delay on the right.

and countless others,

..like the majority.

is slowly revealing the true intentions of these

seemingly unconnected (except for ideology)

people.

Hahaha....watch the little green men, Dave, when you're out there.

The rise of conservative groups and

watchdog organizations to balance the

prejudice of the left on university campuses,

will hopefully slow and eventually correct

much of the damage that the left has done in

the last 30 years.

You're just sore because the filibuster wasn't done away with,
illustrating you are at war with the laws and safety nets the government
put in place to protect the majority from angry radical loonies like
yourself.

(I have found the U.K., Canada, and Australia
to be pretty nifty places.)

Of course, the world

is just loaded with the liberal left ... )

People with paranoia issues tend to feel like everyone else is against
them.

You have to understand that in much of the

world, especially in the socialist-leaning

countries like France and Germany, there is a

decidedly anti-capitalist, anti-US slant.

Bush made it that way. In addition, in countries around the world, it is
extremely unsafe for Americans to travel abroad. It was never like that
until Bush took office and the only thing he made safer was the bet that
he was going to take this country into debt and get a bunch of our
people killed for reasons that even you can't seem to place in proper
context.

So if you think you will get an objective news

piece from any of them, you are seriously

naive.

There's that arrogance. No Dave, I am fairly comfortable when I say the
majority would claim Jimbo, at almost 20 years your senior,
is not naive in the ways of the world and their news. In fact, I would
hedge that his experience abroad in the military exposed him to much
more than yourself regarding worldwide knowledge and news, and
therefore, it is your claim, if any, that is "naive".
You again are claiming the news is biased to the left. Since the news is
all biased to the left, (you have been asked this before), what source
is it from which you get your misinformation?

As for the U.K., Canada, and Australia, they

are more balanced but depending on which

factions are backing the "news", you could be

reading either left or right wing slant.

LMAO,,you know jack ****t!!! Name two "factions" for each.

It helps to dig deeply into who backs these

groups in order to determine just how

"objective" they may or may not be.

And since you are talking **** again, you would have no problem
illustrating two factions for each..you know,,,since you had to "dig
deeply" for these factions.......

(Hitler did a pretty good job convincing his
people as to what was right and wrong. )

Yes, and just like Hitler blamed all or most of

Germany's problems on the Jews, so to are

the operatives on the left trying to blame most

of America's problems on rich, God

respecting, white people.

Oh, but you have problems. You have always neatly presented you hold
other views (such as an American political party other than yours) in
contempt, but to publicly claim the democrats
are akin to nazis really illustrates your magnified ignorance. It is the
Bush admin that has paraphrased Stalin and invoked the exact same
rhetoric. When Bush-the-ignorant was informed that he paraphrased Stalin
in one of his speeches, he never repeated it again and that was the end
of it. The utterance? "You are either with us or against us". So now we
have YOUR party not only employing the rhetoric and behavior of those
oppressive murderous thugs, but people like you telling any one who
dares illustrate the misdeeds of your party they are "naive".

(I am not so easily persuaded.)

Neither am I.

You're not easily taught, either.

David T. Hall Jr.

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Roger Beeps 100% ILLEGAL	Bert Craig	CB	181	April 15th 05 01:10 PM

Menu

About Us