Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:28:24 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: You will get interference rings [Hecht rolling his eyes] for a target that is smaller than a wavelength? Must be another failure of Hecht (or Hecht pupil). of 400w/unit-area and rings of 0w/unit-area all averaging out to 200w total. Which, of course, cannot be found in the formula: Itot = I1 + I2 + 2*Sqrt(I1*I2)cos(theta) nor its correction: Itot = I1 + I2 +2*SQRT(I1*I2)cos(theta) If the sources are incapable of supplying the extra power, Which, in the end was a non sequitur. For every P1+P2+2*SQRT(P1*P2), i.e. constructive interference, Which, of course, cannot be found in the formula: Itot = I1 + I2 + 2*Sqrt(I1*I2)cos(theta) nor its correction: Itot = I1 + I2 +2*SQRT(I1*I2)cos(theta) there is a P1+P2-2*SQRT(P1*P2), i.e. destructive interference. Which, of course, cannot be found in the formula: Itot = I1 + I2 + 2*Sqrt(I1*I2)cos(theta) nor its correction: Itot = I1 + I2 +2*SQRT(I1*I2)cos(theta) When combined with the adhominem (which, of course, reveals another inaccuracy, one of assignment): Please spare us your ignorance and read the book. is possibly the best advice (once the assignment is corrected), given the continuing goof-ups. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|