From: (John=A0Smith)
CB reflects the real world...
John
_
The "CB is a reflection of society" angle, eh? There's some good reading
in the archives on this : )

iangb:

No need to consult the past, it exists now, and will be the future... we all
reflect the present state of society, and so does our methods of
communications...

.... this is why amateur radio is now being drug into the 2nd millennium, we
have just gotten around to it...

John

"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
...
From: (John Smith)
CB reflects the real world...
John
_
The "CB is a reflection of society" angle, eh? There's some good reading
in the archives on this : )

From: (John=A0Smith)
iangb:
No need to consult the past,

Sure there is, otherwise such wouldn't be mandatory requirement courses
found in institutions of higher learning. Indeed, there is a huge need
in which to consult the past among intellectuals. It's when one wishes
to argue history that self-confusion is born.

it exists now, and

will be the future...

How profound! If our society does not learn from history, many times we
are condemned to repeat the same mistakes.

we all

reflect the present state of society, and so

does our methods of

communications...

True for the modern mainstream methods of communications, not archaic
hobbies like CB or CW.

... this is why amateur radio is now being drug

into the 2nd millennium, we have just gotten

around to it...

John

Amateur radio isn't being "drug" anywhere. On the contrary, it's barely
surviving as a method of modern communications, with the sole exception
of certain disasters which occasionally carry it to the news. The
dropping of code is writing on the wall. The hobby is gasping for air
and on its last legs.

IANGB:

You think you can argue philosophy with intelligent people?

ROFLOL!!!!

John

"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
...
From: (John Smith)
iangb:
No need to consult the past,

Sure there is, otherwise such wouldn't be mandatory requirement courses
found in institutions of higher learning. Indeed, there is a huge need
in which to consult the past among intellectuals. It's when one wishes
to argue history that self-confusion is born.

it exists now, and

will be the future...

How profound! If our society does not learn from history, many times we
are condemned to repeat the same mistakes.

we all

reflect the present state of society, and so

does our methods of

communications...

True for the modern mainstream methods of communications, not archaic
hobbies like CB or CW.

... this is why amateur radio is now being drug

into the 2nd millennium, we have just gotten

around to it...

John

Amateur radio isn't being "drug" anywhere. On the contrary, it's barely
surviving as a method of modern communications, with the sole exception
of certain disasters which occasionally carry it to the news. The
dropping of code is writing on the wall. The hobby is gasping for air
and on its last legs.

From: (John=A0Smith)
IANGB:

You think you can argue philosophy with

intelligent people?

If the train of thought is too difficult for you to remain on topic, we
can discuss such limitations of yours you feel pertinent, but it's much
more productive to focus on that of which you already claimed instead
of running from it when corrected.

ROFLOL!!!!

John


This group has cleaned up rather nicely. The intellects among the group
rarely argue among each other. In fact, your posts have insulted
everyone who disagrees with you. What you misinterpret as arguing is but
mere corrections being bestowed upon thee's learning process



"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
... From:
(John Smith) iangb:

No need to consult the past,

Sure there is, otherwise such wouldn't be mandatory requirement courses
found in institutions of higher learning. Indeed, there is a huge need
in which to consult the past among intellectuals. It's when one wishes
to argue history that self-confusion is born.

it exists now, and

will be the future...

How profound! If our society does not learn from history, many times we
are condemned to repeat the same mistakes.

we all

reflect the present state of society,


Including those tribes in New Guinea that still utilize smoke signals,
eh? Nah,,,don't think so.


and so

does our methods of

communications...

True for the modern mainstream methods of communications, not archaic
hobbies like CB or CW.

... this is why amateur radio is now being drug

into the 2nd millennium, we have just gotten

around to it...

John

Amateur radio isn't being "drug" anywhere. On the contrary, it's barely
surviving as a method of modern communications, with the sole exception
of certain disasters which occasionally carry it to the news. The
dropping of code is writing on the wall. The hobby is gasping for air
and on its last legs.

(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (John=A0Smith)
IANGB:

You think you can argue philosophy with

intelligent people?

If the train of thought is too difficult for you to remain on topic, we
can discuss such limitations of yours you feel pertinent, but it's much
more productive to focus on that of which you already claimed instead
of running from it when corrected.

ROFLOL!!!!

John

This group has cleaned up rather nicely. The intellects among the group
rarely argue among each other. In fact, your posts have insulted
everyone who disagrees with you.

He does that in every radio he posts to, Twist. No less than 4 that I read
anyway. He craves attention, just like an anonymous punk always does.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

IANGB:

I don't debate with monkeys or gorillas either... both animals of greater
intellect that you...

John

"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
...
From: (John Smith)
IANGB:

You think you can argue philosophy with

intelligent people?

If the train of thought is too difficult for you to remain on topic, we
can discuss such limitations of yours you feel pertinent, but it's much
more productive to focus on that of which you already claimed instead
of running from it when corrected.

ROFLOL!!!!

John


This group has cleaned up rather nicely. The intellects among the group
rarely argue among each other. In fact, your posts have insulted
everyone who disagrees with you. What you misinterpret as arguing is but
mere corrections being bestowed upon thee's learning process



"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
... From:
(John Smith) iangb:

No need to consult the past,

Sure there is, otherwise such wouldn't be mandatory requirement courses
found in institutions of higher learning. Indeed, there is a huge need
in which to consult the past among intellectuals. It's when one wishes
to argue history that self-confusion is born.

it exists now, and

will be the future...

How profound! If our society does not learn from history, many times we
are condemned to repeat the same mistakes.

we all

reflect the present state of society,


Including those tribes in New Guinea that still utilize smoke signals,
eh? Nah,,,don't think so.


and so

does our methods of

communications...

True for the modern mainstream methods of communications, not archaic
hobbies like CB or CW.

... this is why amateur radio is now being drug

into the 2nd millennium, we have just gotten

around to it...

John

Amateur radio isn't being "drug" anywhere. On the contrary, it's barely
surviving as a method of modern communications, with the sole exception
of certain disasters which occasionally carry it to the news. The
dropping of code is writing on the wall. The hobby is gasping for air
and on its last legs.

From: (John=A0Smith)
IANGB:

I don't debate with monkeys or gorillas either...

That's because of how small you feel every time you are illustrated
wrong.
Besides, only you are arguing with yourself.

John
_
"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
... From:
(John Smith)
IANGB:

You think you can argue philosophy with

intelligent people?

If the train of thought is too difficult for you to remain on topic, we
can discuss such limitations of yours you feel pertinent, but it's much
more productive to focus on that of which you already claimed instead of
running from it when corrected.

ROFLOL!!!!

John


This group has cleaned up rather nicely. The intellects among the group
rarely argue among each other. In fact, your posts have insulted
everyone who disagrees with you. What you misinterpret as arguing is but
mere corrections being bestowed upon thee's learning process