Bigfoot photo or Bogus?
 

Another Bigfoot sighting has been reported in Oklahoma. A newspaper
business information web site has the latest photo image. See what you
think.

You can see it at: http://www.newspaper-info.com

Click on the "Bigfoot" link.


JJ

"Jason" wrote:
Another Bigfoot sighting has been reported in Oklahoma. A newspaper
business information web site has the latest photo image. See what you
think.

You can see it at: http://www.newspaper-info.com

Click on the "Bigfoot" link.

JJ

That's Frank.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

you lust after bigfoot, wristflipper.

On 12 Aug 2005 23:28:21 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

"Jason" wrote:
Another Bigfoot sighting has been reported in Oklahoma. A newspaper
business information web site has the latest photo image. See what you
think.

You can see it at: http://www.newspaper-info.com

Click on the "Bigfoot" link.

JJ

That's Frank.


By golly, you're right! I played with the histogram and..... well, see
for yourself:

www.icehouse.net/wirenut/notahoax.jpg








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 12 Aug 2005 23:28:21 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

"Jason" wrote:
Another Bigfoot sighting has been reported in Oklahoma. A newspaper
business information web site has the latest photo image. See what
you think.

You can see it at: http://www.newspaper-info.com

Click on the "Bigfoot" link.

JJ

That's Frank.

By golly, you're right! I played with the histogram and..... well, see
for yourself:

www.icehouse.net/wirenut/notahoax.jpg

Shazzam!!! lol

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

Jason wrote:
Another Bigfoot sighting has been reported in Oklahoma. A newspaper
business information web site has the latest photo image. See what you
think.

You can see it at: http://www.newspaper-info.com

Click on the "Bigfoot" link.


JJ



If you look at his bangs, it looks he's had a haircut.

Also, if you look at the body there's considerable layering in the hair,
along with a lot of blending or blurred fill- places where there's no
detail and the pixels are all close to the same color. Expand it in a
viewer that will allow determining individual pixels, you'll see what I
mean.

If it is a picture of a genuine bigfoot it's had a lot of unnecessary
doctoring..

John

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:26:31 -0400, JohnM wrote in
:

Jason wrote:
Another Bigfoot sighting has been reported in Oklahoma. A newspaper
business information web site has the latest photo image. See what you
think.

You can see it at: http://www.newspaper-info.com

Click on the "Bigfoot" link.


JJ



If you look at his bangs, it looks he's had a haircut.

Also, if you look at the body there's considerable layering in the hair,
along with a lot of blending or blurred fill- places where there's no
detail and the pixels are all close to the same color. Expand it in a
viewer that will allow determining individual pixels, you'll see what I
mean.

If it is a picture of a genuine bigfoot it's had a lot of unnecessary
doctoring..

John


Follow the link -- it's a double exposure of the Gigantopithecus
reconstruction at the University of Iowa.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

From: (JohnM)
Jason wrote:
Another Bigfoot sighting has been reported in Oklahoma. =A0 A newspaper
business information web site has the latest photo image. See what you
think.
You can see it at: http://www.newspaper-info.com
Click on the "Bigfoot" link.
JJ

If you look at his bangs, it looks he's had a

haircut.

Also, if you look at the body there's

considerable layering in the hair, along with a

lot of blending or blurred fill- places where

there's no detail and the pixels are all close to

the same color. Expand it in a viewer that will

allow determining individual pixels, you'll see

what I mean.

If it is a picture of a genuine bigfoot it's had a

lot of unnecessary doctoring..

John


Blow it up and you can see transparency.

Frank Gilliland wrote:

Follow the link -- it's a double exposure of the

Gigantopithecus reconstruction at the

University of Iowa.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com -

Ha! Beautiful!