|
Hey, -- Magnum -- that's just a brand of rubber, isn't it? Is it, titter titter that was so funny....ha ahahaha youll never need one as your just a little pecker.... yawl have a nice day now You'll need one, you big dickhead. Yes i am rather well endowed.... nice of you to notice but i dont bat your way so kindly keep your eyes off... You likely don't bat at all. Which shows really you know nothing about me and are quite an immature name caller... |
wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:56:06 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:13:08 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message ... U-Know-Who wrote: Well, if you ignore their cooking... -- Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and cabbage? Horsemeat.... I thought at first glance you'd written "horse****". You wouldn't have been far off if you had. Ha haa hahahahaa aha pot and kettles with black included mate. Every country knows the truth with that one, i wont push it further.. English five-star hotel -- one with French cooks. Id say American 5 star hotel, with a Fatty Arbuckles or McDonalds franchise but you already know that... Best you can do for a smiug-**** reply? If we'd let the Germans have you in WWII, you'd at least have a marginally better "cuisine" right now. You do sprawl some absolute drivel. Id get out a bit more if i was you.... |
wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:59:13 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:11:01 GMT, "U-Know-Who" wrote: "-=jd=-" wrote in message . 18... On Thu 08 Sep 2005 06:14:23p, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message : The Magnum wrote: I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a red indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came into contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how to become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire you would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live in a mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy......... You guys are civilized now? When did that happen? I really need to get out more.... Well, if you ignore their cooking... -=jd=- -- Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and cabbage? Put enough curry in it and you can gag it down. Some people forget which way civilization lowed in this regard. So come on then mr food critic, give us an insight into what you eat then which puts you in a position to criticise or even to know what your typing about... and what do you mean by civilisation lowed in this regard... its a bit of a strange statement... Flowed, jerkoff. You have no gift for context. You're simply unwilling to admit the only thing to recommend eating in England is that which you were given by those you subjugated, natve English "cuisine" is pasty crap. Well given the standard of your spelling how are we supposed to know what you are on about. And as for gift of context the utter drivel you spout is quite amusing. It also lets others know you are quite immature and dont know an awful lot. If I was to get down to the same level as you I would say all you americans eat are donuts, turkey and mcdonalds..... thats the steriotype which i know not to be true... now you need to realise what you know is untrue too... |
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "The Magnum" wrote: The British police do carry guns, but only specially trained officers not every rookie cop. Specially trained, like that lot who killed the brazilian guy? Some training. Don't get ID. Take a leak instead of watching your subject. Chase him down, again without ID. Pin him to a seat in the Tube. THEN shoot. Sorry, I don't give a rat**** about these "my country is better than yours" threads but do NOT give me this "Specially trained" bull****. That was an amateur screw up, that cost an innocent man his life. One occurance and the Brazilian guy was so innocent his address was found in one of the un-exploded back packs. The only thing he was innocent of was that he wasnt actually carrying a bomb and probably wasnt part of the 5 bomb assault team that day. What about the American Police who shoot to kill then ask questions later.... your saying this doesnt happen? As far as my country is better than your country goes, i have never said that and nor will i. I have a huge amount of respect for America and its people.. well, most of its people... and you will find if you knew me at all i take as i find.. if people are nice to me i am nice back. I am nice to people who i dont know... until they make me dislike them... The specially trained quote is true... they are not normal Bobbies on the Beat.. but that said, even specially trained people screw up sometimes, its a fact of life. |
"Honus" wrote in message news:OfZUe.7151$8h6.3446@trnddc09... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:LgKUe.1743$b37.486@trnddc04... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... Well, if you ignore their cooking... Whats wrong with list deleted The way you "cook" it. Which way is that?? Badly? In what way is it cooked badly?? and to what are you referring to?? if your going to make a statement at least "put some meat on the bones" |
wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:37:40 +0100, "The Magnum Dickum" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... The Magnum wrote: Americans enslaved blacks and nearly wiped out the Native Americans because they wanted to take the land... the wars with the north and south, confederates and yankies were some of the nastiest and uncivilised conflicts in your history and you were well established as Americans at that time and was not down to the British Empire.... i dont know where you learned your history but wherever it was.. if it was... id sue them (hope that wasnt too cheap a shot) Actually, different tribes were constantly fighting, and took slaves when they didn't just kill them. Later, they discovered that they could sell or trade their slaves for things that they wanted with the ships that arrived on the African coast to trade goods. A lot of those ships were from England, and they took the slaves to other places to sell them. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida So Michael, the point you make here is that the different tribes in America were already into slavery and used them to barter with the English for goods and suchlike therefore making my point that slavery wasnt a result of the good old British Colonies... They may have been involved in the transportation of slaves for profilt but that wasnt the point. The previous post said, or tried to imply it was the British Colonies that introduced slavery where that simply wasnt the case. Also most of the slaves who ended up in Britain werent treated quite as badly in comparison although they probably didnt think so at the time. Anyhows this has lead a little off topic as so many threads do, but its nice to actually have a converstaion about things rather than cheap insults. Thank you.. Read for comprehension -- he said, "ships that arrived on the African coast". Doesn't sound to NA, does it? Comprehension is a big word for you to spell correctly, its a shame the rest of it isnt too good... Let me say to you once more The British Empire didnt bring slavery to America, you managed that by yourself quite sucessfully. BTW slavery was around in the days long before the "British Empire", slavery even today is a way of life for many people. |
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... The Magnum wrote: So Michael, the point you make here is that the different tribes in America were already into slavery and used them to barter with the English for goods and suchlike therefore making my point that slavery wasnt a result of the good old British Colonies... They may have been involved in the transportation of slaves for profilt but that wasnt the point. The previous post said, or tried to imply it was the British Colonies that introduced slavery where that simply wasnt the case. Also most of the slaves who ended up in Britain werent treated quite as badly in comparison although they probably didnt think so at the time. Anyhows this has lead a little off topic as so many threads do, but its nice to actually have a converstaion about things rather than cheap insults. Thank you.. The British ships that arrived on the US coast wanted cotton to take to England. That is where they finally got paid. Then they restocked the ship with goods for Africa and repeated the cycle. All they had when they arrived on the shores of the US to trade their cargo was a ship load of slaves and a few manufactured goods from England. They traded both of them for cotton. Only an idiot would mistreat any worker that was doing their best. After all, if you kill all the help you won't make enough money to live, will you? And then there were "Indentured servants" who traded a number of years or labor for passage to the US, and were basically slaves during that time. Legally they were the property of whoever paid their way, till their time was up. I never said I approved of any slavery. On the other hand there were people of every race who were held in slavery at one time or another throughout the history of mankind, and this still doesn't make it right at any time. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida Please dont think for one minute i support or ever did support slavery... because i dont and you know, as well as i that slavery still goes on in many countrys today, especially some third world countrys but there is also still a lot of it in the US and to a degree the UK too. I have no problems with the comments you have made Michael and on the whole i agree with you. The whole arguement on this thread was someone whit half a brain saying it was the British Empire that created slavery.. and it simply isnt true. All i pointed out was that slavery was massive in the US and you even had internal wars over it so to have a go at the UK over slavery was a bit idiotic. Cheers... |
Actually it was the british colonies that introduced slavery in America. The first imported African slaves brought to the British North American colonies were landed at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619. Long before the U.S.A. existed. In the 17th century, slavery was used as punishment by conquering English Parliament armies against native Catholics in Ireland. Between the years 1649 and 1653, during the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland by the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell, thousands of Irish Catholics were forced into slavery. Cromwell had a deeply religious antipathy to the Catholic religion and Irish Catholics who had participated in Confederate Ireland had all their land confiscated and were transported to the West Indies as slaves. Actually it was the british colonies that introduced slavery in America. The first imported African slaves brought to the British North American colonies were landed at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619. Long before the U.S.A. existed. In the 17th century, slavery was used as punishment by conquering English Parliament armies against native Catholics in Ireland. Between the years 1649 and 1653, during the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland by the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell, thousands of Irish Catholics were forced into slavery. Cromwell had a deeply religious antipathy to the Catholic religion and Irish Catholics who had participated in Confederate Ireland had all their land confiscated and were transported to the West Indies as slaves. Eh?? why are you telling me this?? I didnt say and never have that slavery never existed in the UK and i never said The British Empire didnt condone and use slavery. But the English never introduced slavery to the US Chronology Of The History Of Slavery: 1619-1789 1619 The other crucial event that would play a role in the development of America was the arrival of Africans to Jamestown. A Dutch slave trader exchanged his cargo of Africans for food in 1619. The Africans became indentured servants, similar in legal position to many poor Englishmen who traded several years labor in exchange for passage to America. The popular conception of a racial-based slave system did not develop until the 1680's. (A Brief History of Jamestown, The Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities, Richmond, VA 23220, email: , Web published February, 2000) Note the word DUTCH.... Regards, Graham |
So who are your ancestors... where did they originate from? Ireland. Yes indeed, it explains your attitude... did you hear about the Rioting in Belfast yesterday BTW...shocking... just animals.... |
"Lancer" wrote in message news:4326996c.11367359@2355323778... On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 19:36:42 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: You *******s have ****ed over every country or civilization you ever came into contact with. British Empire my ass. I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a red indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came into contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how to become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire you would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live in a mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy......... Come on now, you think everyone in the U.S.A. ancestors are english? Not at all but a good many of them are... thats also why your common language is English.... |
American Walmarts and other stores regularly
carry guns, liquor and ammo for your pleasure and shopping convenience. 1-stop shopping, donchaknow! Absolutely... we know this but what sort of restraints are there on the average "Jo Shopper" from purchasing a gun from one of these places? There must be some kind of control surely? |
The Magnum wrote:
Come on now, you think everyone in the U.S.A. ancestors are english? Not at all but a good many of them are... thats also why your common language is English.... Driving down South Boulevard this morning, you'd have thought our common language was Spanish. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE "Oye, Gingo Asshole" |
|
"Lancer" wrote in message news:4325d050.25419343@2355323778... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:24:48 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: Actually it was the british colonies that introduced slavery in America. The first imported African slaves brought to the British North American colonies were landed at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619. Long before the U.S.A. existed. In the 17th century, slavery was used as punishment by conquering English Parliament armies against native Catholics in Ireland. Between the years 1649 and 1653, during the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland by the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell, thousands of Irish Catholics were forced into slavery. Cromwell had a deeply religious antipathy to the Catholic religion and Irish Catholics who had participated in Confederate Ireland had all their land confiscated and were transported to the West Indies as slaves. Actually it was the british colonies that introduced slavery in America. The first imported African slaves brought to the British North American colonies were landed at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619. Long before the U.S.A. existed. In the 17th century, slavery was used as punishment by conquering English Parliament armies against native Catholics in Ireland. Between the years 1649 and 1653, during the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland by the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell, thousands of Irish Catholics were forced into slavery. Cromwell had a deeply religious antipathy to the Catholic religion and Irish Catholics who had participated in Confederate Ireland had all their land confiscated and were transported to the West Indies as slaves. Eh?? why are you telling me this?? I didnt say and never have that slavery never existed in the UK and i never said The British Empire didnt condone and use slavery. But the English never introduced slavery to the US Yes it was directed to you. Because the British did introduce slavery to the U.S. Chronology Of The History Of Slavery: 1619-1789 1619 The other crucial event that would play a role in the development of America was the arrival of Africans to Jamestown. A Dutch slave trader exchanged his cargo of Africans for food in 1619. The Africans became indentured servants, similar in legal position to many poor Englishmen who traded several years labor in exchange for passage to America. The popular conception of a racial-based slave system did not develop until the 1680's. (A Brief History of Jamestown, The Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities, Richmond, VA 23220, email: , Web published February, 2000) Note the word DUTCH.... Regards, Graham Yes note the word Dutch, as, British colonization imported 21 slaves from a Dutch frigate to the colony in Jamestown, Virginia in 1619, three of whom are known to have been named Isabella, Antoney and Pedro. Isabella and Antoney had later given birth to a slave boy named William. This "William Tucker" is now considered the first African American born in the English colonies in North America. The Dutch delivered them, the British enslaved them. Note the word British.... Dont you think if the DUTCH person SOLD them to the ENGLISH colonies then they were ALREADY slaves??? |
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message m... The Magnum wrote: Come on now, you think everyone in the U.S.A. ancestors are english? Not at all but a good many of them are... thats also why your common language is English.... Driving down South Boulevard this morning, you'd have thought our common language was Spanish. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE "Oye, Gingo Asshole" Indeed, if you were to drive down Sparkbrook in Birmingham UK you would think the common language was Urdu ;o) |
"Lancer" wrote in message news:4326d316.26128812@2355323778... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:27:37 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Lancer" wrote in message news:4326996c.11367359@2355323778... On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 19:36:42 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: You *******s have ****ed over every country or civilization you ever came into contact with. British Empire my ass. I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a red indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came into contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how to become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire you would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live in a mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy......... Come on now, you think everyone in the U.S.A. ancestors are english? Not at all but a good many of them are... thats also why your common language is English.... Nah, I speak american...I spent a month working in the U.K., I needed a translater.. The hardest to understand were your phone operators.. No such language as American... you will find it is English, just because you use a few different words or a few of your words have different meanings its still English.. Try phoning someone in Tyne and Wear UK and youll have even more diffuculty ;o) |
"The Magnum" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:OfZUe.7151$8h6.3446@trnddc09... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:LgKUe.1743$b37.486@trnddc04... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... Well, if you ignore their cooking... Whats wrong with list deleted The way you "cook" it. Which way is that?? Badly? In what way is it cooked badly?? and to what are you referring to?? if your going to make a statement at least "put some meat on the bones" Why bother? It'd just end up over-cooked. ;) |
"The Magnum" wrote in message ... "Lancer" wrote in message news:4326996c.11367359@2355323778... On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 19:36:42 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: You *******s have ****ed over every country or civilization you ever came into contact with. British Empire my ass. I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a red indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came into contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how to become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire you would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live in a mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy......... Come on now, you think everyone in the U.S.A. ancestors are english? Not at all but a good many of them are... thats also why your common language is English.... It's rapidly eroding into "Ebonics". |
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:46:08 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:56:06 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:13:08 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message ... U-Know-Who wrote: Well, if you ignore their cooking... -- Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and cabbage? Horsemeat.... I thought at first glance you'd written "horse****". You wouldn't have been far off if you had. Ha haa hahahahaa aha pot and kettles with black included mate. Every country knows the truth with that one, i wont push it further.. English five-star hotel -- one with French cooks. Id say American 5 star hotel, with a Fatty Arbuckles or McDonalds franchise but you already know that... Best you can do for a smiug-**** reply? If we'd let the Germans have you in WWII, you'd at least have a marginally better "cuisine" right now. You do sprawl some absolute drivel. Id get out a bit more if i was you.... Your ass was on the block and you damned well know it. As does everyone else. Sprawl??? Some kind of homespun limey longo? You should just get out. Permanently. |
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:52:15 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:59:13 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:11:01 GMT, "U-Know-Who" wrote: "-=jd=-" wrote in message . 18... On Thu 08 Sep 2005 06:14:23p, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message : The Magnum wrote: I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a red indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came into contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how to become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire you would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live in a mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy......... You guys are civilized now? When did that happen? I really need to get out more.... Well, if you ignore their cooking... -=jd=- -- Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and cabbage? Put enough curry in it and you can gag it down. Some people forget which way civilization lowed in this regard. So come on then mr food critic, give us an insight into what you eat then which puts you in a position to criticise or even to know what your typing about... and what do you mean by civilisation lowed in this regard... its a bit of a strange statement... Flowed, jerkoff. You have no gift for context. You're simply unwilling to admit the only thing to recommend eating in England is that which you were given by those you subjugated, natve English "cuisine" is pasty crap. Well given the standard of your spelling how are we supposed to know what you are on about. And as for gift of context the utter drivel you spout is quite amusing. It also lets others know you are quite immature and dont know an awful lot. If I was to get down to the same level as you I would say all you americans eat are donuts, turkey and mcdonalds..... thats the steriotype which i know not to be true... now you need to realise what you know is untrue too... Lessee, spelling -- donuts mcdonalds i -- you have a lot to criticize with. But since you think you'd have kicked German ass alone, maybe you're better off caviling about spelling since you have nothing substantive to argue with. |
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:07:24 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:37:40 +0100, "The Magnum Dickum" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... The Magnum wrote: Americans enslaved blacks and nearly wiped out the Native Americans because they wanted to take the land... the wars with the north and south, confederates and yankies were some of the nastiest and uncivilised conflicts in your history and you were well established as Americans at that time and was not down to the British Empire.... i dont know where you learned your history but wherever it was.. if it was... id sue them (hope that wasnt too cheap a shot) Actually, different tribes were constantly fighting, and took slaves when they didn't just kill them. Later, they discovered that they could sell or trade their slaves for things that they wanted with the ships that arrived on the African coast to trade goods. A lot of those ships were from England, and they took the slaves to other places to sell them. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida So Michael, the point you make here is that the different tribes in America were already into slavery and used them to barter with the English for goods and suchlike therefore making my point that slavery wasnt a result of the good old British Colonies... They may have been involved in the transportation of slaves for profilt but that wasnt the point. The previous post said, or tried to imply it was the British Colonies that introduced slavery where that simply wasnt the case. Also most of the slaves who ended up in Britain werent treated quite as badly in comparison although they probably didnt think so at the time. Anyhows this has lead a little off topic as so many threads do, but its nice to actually have a converstaion about things rather than cheap insults. Thank you.. Read for comprehension -- he said, "ships that arrived on the African coast". Doesn't sound to NA, does it? Comprehension is a big word for you to spell correctly, But I did so successfully, didn't I. You, in turn, followed up immediately with -- its, isnt, and didnt (all incorrect) in the following two sentences. So get down off your pretentious pink horsie before criticizing my orthgraphy. Back from the dictionary yet, you twit? its a shame the rest of it isnt too good... Let me say to you once more The British Empire didnt bring slavery to America, you managed that by yourself quite sucessfully. BTW slavery was around in the days long before the "British Empire", slavery even today is a way of life for many people. |
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:13:54 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... The Magnum wrote: So Michael, the point you make here is that the different tribes in America were already into slavery and used them to barter with the English for goods and suchlike therefore making my point that slavery wasnt a result of the good old British Colonies... They may have been involved in the transportation of slaves for profilt but that wasnt the point. The previous post said, or tried to imply it was the British Colonies that introduced slavery where that simply wasnt the case. Also most of the slaves who ended up in Britain werent treated quite as badly in comparison although they probably didnt think so at the time. Anyhows this has lead a little off topic as so many threads do, but its nice to actually have a converstaion about things rather than cheap insults. Thank you.. The British ships that arrived on the US coast wanted cotton to take to England. That is where they finally got paid. Then they restocked the ship with goods for Africa and repeated the cycle. All they had when they arrived on the shores of the US to trade their cargo was a ship load of slaves and a few manufactured goods from England. They traded both of them for cotton. Only an idiot would mistreat any worker that was doing their best. After all, if you kill all the help you won't make enough money to live, will you? And then there were "Indentured servants" who traded a number of years or labor for passage to the US, and were basically slaves during that time. Legally they were the property of whoever paid their way, till their time was up. I never said I approved of any slavery. On the other hand there were people of every race who were held in slavery at one time or another throughout the history of mankind, and this still doesn't make it right at any time. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida Please dont think for one minute i support or ever did support slavery... because i dont and you know, as well as i that slavery still goes on in many countrys today, especially some third world countrys but there is also still a lot of it in the US and to a degree the UK too. I have no problems with the comments you have made Michael and on the whole i agree with you. The whole arguement on this thread was someone whit half a brain saying it was the British Empire that created slavery.. and it simply isnt true. All i pointed out was that slavery was massive in the US and you even had internal wars over it so to have a go at the UK over slavery was a bit idiotic. Cheers... More illiterate drivel from the looney who finds fit to criticize the spelling of his betters. Anyone who can't pick out at least ten spelling, capitalization or grammar errors in this pompous blowhard's tripe should review the fundamentals. |
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:26:31 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote: So who are your ancestors... where did they originate from? Ireland. Yes indeed, it explains your attitude... did you hear about the Rioting in Belfast yesterday BTW...shocking... just animals.... If the Brits and their proxies would just give up their ill-gotten gains and get the hell out, it would all disappear in a minute. But no, they have to hang on like a dog with a bone. Grasping *******s. |
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:44:42 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote: Hey, -- Magnum -- that's just a brand of rubber, isn't it? Is it, titter titter that was so funny....ha ahahaha youll never need one as your just a little pecker.... yawl have a nice day now You'll need one, you big dickhead. Yes i am rather well endowed.... nice of you to notice but i dont bat your way so kindly keep your eyes off... You likely don't bat at all. Which shows really you know nothing about me and are quite an immature name caller... You still don't bat. |
wrote:
Your ass was on the block and you damned well know it. As does everyone else. Sprawl??? Some kind of homespun limey longo? You should just get out. Permanently. Oh, yeah... I almost forgot. We want those rifles back... the ones American civilians provided from their own homes so you could protect yourselves when the Huns came a'visiting. You never returned them after the war. That's just plain rude. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:44:42 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: Hey, -- Magnum -- that's just a brand of rubber, isn't it? Is it, titter titter that was so funny....ha ahahaha youll never need one as your just a little pecker.... yawl have a nice day now You'll need one, you big dickhead. Yes i am rather well endowed.... nice of you to notice but i dont bat your way so kindly keep your eyes off... You likely don't bat at all. Which shows really you know nothing about me and are quite an immature name caller... You still don't bat. Im married with 4 daughters... and we showed the Aussies we can Bat :o) The Ashes are OURS... wooo hoooh |
wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:46:08 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:56:06 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:13:08 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message ... U-Know-Who wrote: Well, if you ignore their cooking... -- Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and cabbage? Horsemeat.... I thought at first glance you'd written "horse****". You wouldn't have been far off if you had. Ha haa hahahahaa aha pot and kettles with black included mate. Every country knows the truth with that one, i wont push it further.. English five-star hotel -- one with French cooks. Id say American 5 star hotel, with a Fatty Arbuckles or McDonalds franchise but you already know that... Best you can do for a smiug-**** reply? If we'd let the Germans have you in WWII, you'd at least have a marginally better "cuisine" right now. You do sprawl some absolute drivel. Id get out a bit more if i was you.... Your ass was on the block and you damned well know it. As does everyone else. Sprawl??? Some kind of homespun limey longo? You should just get out. Permanently. Yes its a proper word even mentioned the the Concise English Dictionary... try reading it sometimes, it will help with your spelling |
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message ... wrote: Your ass was on the block and you damned well know it. As does everyone else. Sprawl??? Some kind of homespun limey longo? You should just get out. Permanently. Oh, yeah... I almost forgot. We want those rifles back... the ones American civilians provided from their own homes so you could protect yourselves when the Huns came a'visiting. You never returned them after the war. That's just plain rude. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE Dont you think you have enough guns about in America? ;o) |
wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:52:15 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:59:13 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:11:01 GMT, "U-Know-Who" wrote: "-=jd=-" wrote in message . 18... On Thu 08 Sep 2005 06:14:23p, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message : The Magnum wrote: I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a red indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came into contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how to become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire you would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live in a mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy......... You guys are civilized now? When did that happen? I really need to get out more.... Well, if you ignore their cooking... -=jd=- -- Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and cabbage? Put enough curry in it and you can gag it down. Some people forget which way civilization lowed in this regard. So come on then mr food critic, give us an insight into what you eat then which puts you in a position to criticise or even to know what your typing about... and what do you mean by civilisation lowed in this regard... its a bit of a strange statement... Flowed, jerkoff. You have no gift for context. You're simply unwilling to admit the only thing to recommend eating in England is that which you were given by those you subjugated, natve English "cuisine" is pasty crap. Well given the standard of your spelling how are we supposed to know what you are on about. And as for gift of context the utter drivel you spout is quite amusing. It also lets others know you are quite immature and dont know an awful lot. If I was to get down to the same level as you I would say all you americans eat are donuts, turkey and mcdonalds..... thats the steriotype which i know not to be true... now you need to realise what you know is untrue too... Lessee, spelling -- donuts mcdonalds i -- you have a lot to criticize with. But since you think you'd have kicked German ass alone, maybe you're better off caviling about spelling since you have nothing substantive to argue with. Ermm, i think you have me mixed up with someone else. Your the only one whos mentioned the war... i think you have voices in your head which explains a lot.... |
"Honus" wrote in message news:M4qVe.7544$8h6.5893@trnddc09... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:OfZUe.7151$8h6.3446@trnddc09... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:LgKUe.1743$b37.486@trnddc04... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... Well, if you ignore their cooking... Whats wrong with list deleted The way you "cook" it. Which way is that?? Badly? In what way is it cooked badly?? and to what are you referring to?? if your going to make a statement at least "put some meat on the bones" Why bother? It'd just end up over-cooked. ;) Oh yes, i forgot you like everything RAW... :oP |
Comprehension is a big word for you to spell correctly, But I did so successfully, didn't I. **Yes but quite probably because you looked it up in the dictionary.... shame you let yourself down in the next sentance though mis spelling a simple word. You used "to" in place of "too" By the way i dont own a pink horsie so either youve mistaken me for someone else again or you have this sort of fettish going on in your head.... It's, Isn't and Didn't are all correct terms of use. ** You, in turn, followed up immediately with -- its, isnt, and didnt (all incorrect) in the following two sentences. So get down off your pretentious pink horsie before criticizing my orthgraphy. Back from the dictionary yet, you twit? ** Me the twit... lol, then you say a word that doesnt exist orthgraphy unless you meant Orthography. Horsie also doesnt exist as a word... i could go on.. and youd come back with more garbage so ill leave it there... carry on if you must but im not going to waste any more time on you... have a nice day now... |
wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:13:54 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... The Magnum wrote: So Michael, the point you make here is that the different tribes in America were already into slavery and used them to barter with the English for goods and suchlike therefore making my point that slavery wasnt a result of the good old British Colonies... They may have been involved in the transportation of slaves for profilt but that wasnt the point. The previous post said, or tried to imply it was the British Colonies that introduced slavery where that simply wasnt the case. Also most of the slaves who ended up in Britain werent treated quite as badly in comparison although they probably didnt think so at the time. Anyhows this has lead a little off topic as so many threads do, but its nice to actually have a converstaion about things rather than cheap insults. Thank you.. The British ships that arrived on the US coast wanted cotton to take to England. That is where they finally got paid. Then they restocked the ship with goods for Africa and repeated the cycle. All they had when they arrived on the shores of the US to trade their cargo was a ship load of slaves and a few manufactured goods from England. They traded both of them for cotton. Only an idiot would mistreat any worker that was doing their best. After all, if you kill all the help you won't make enough money to live, will you? And then there were "Indentured servants" who traded a number of years or labor for passage to the US, and were basically slaves during that time. Legally they were the property of whoever paid their way, till their time was up. I never said I approved of any slavery. On the other hand there were people of every race who were held in slavery at one time or another throughout the history of mankind, and this still doesn't make it right at any time. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida Please dont think for one minute i support or ever did support slavery... because i dont and you know, as well as i that slavery still goes on in many countrys today, especially some third world countrys but there is also still a lot of it in the US and to a degree the UK too. I have no problems with the comments you have made Michael and on the whole i agree with you. The whole arguement on this thread was someone whit half a brain saying it was the British Empire that created slavery.. and it simply isnt true. All i pointed out was that slavery was massive in the US and you even had internal wars over it so to have a go at the UK over slavery was a bit idiotic. Cheers... More illiterate drivel from the looney who finds fit to criticize the spelling of his betters. Anyone who can't pick out at least ten spelling, capitalization or grammar errors in this pompous blowhard's tripe should review the fundamentals. How are we to follow a conversation littered with grammatical errors that make words unrecognisable? And as illiteracy goes, surely it's the "dum dum" who can't spell that's illiterate. And as for betters... LMFAO.... As far as fundamentals go too, I was quite happy to have a sensible meaningful discussion but, as with many postings in here, you let yourselves down badly with incorrect theories of History and seem to have no real grasp of reality and any realistic command of the English language. Then because the person posting isn't American you jump in with both feet then get upset when you're shown up. Mock me if you will but in the end it will be you who shows themselves up... 10-4 |
"Lancer" wrote in message news:4325e0b5.29616562@2355323778... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:10:32 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Lancer" wrote in message news:4325d050.25419343@2355323778... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:24:48 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: Actually it was the british colonies that introduced slavery in America. The first imported African slaves brought to the British North American colonies were landed at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619. Long before the U.S.A. existed. In the 17th century, slavery was used as punishment by conquering English Parliament armies against native Catholics in Ireland. Between the years 1649 and 1653, during the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland by the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell, thousands of Irish Catholics were forced into slavery. Cromwell had a deeply religious antipathy to the Catholic religion and Irish Catholics who had participated in Confederate Ireland had all their land confiscated and were transported to the West Indies as slaves. Actually it was the british colonies that introduced slavery in America. The first imported African slaves brought to the British North American colonies were landed at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619. Long before the U.S.A. existed. In the 17th century, slavery was used as punishment by conquering English Parliament armies against native Catholics in Ireland. Between the years 1649 and 1653, during the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland by the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell, thousands of Irish Catholics were forced into slavery. Cromwell had a deeply religious antipathy to the Catholic religion and Irish Catholics who had participated in Confederate Ireland had all their land confiscated and were transported to the West Indies as slaves. Eh?? why are you telling me this?? I didnt say and never have that slavery never existed in the UK and i never said The British Empire didnt condone and use slavery. But the English never introduced slavery to the US Yes it was directed to you. Because the British did introduce slavery to the U.S. Chronology Of The History Of Slavery: 1619-1789 1619 The other crucial event that would play a role in the development of America was the arrival of Africans to Jamestown. A Dutch slave trader exchanged his cargo of Africans for food in 1619. The Africans became indentured servants, similar in legal position to many poor Englishmen who traded several years labor in exchange for passage to America. The popular conception of a racial-based slave system did not develop until the 1680's. (A Brief History of Jamestown, The Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities, Richmond, VA 23220, email: , Web published February, 2000) Note the word DUTCH.... Regards, Graham Yes note the word Dutch, as, British colonization imported 21 slaves from a Dutch frigate to the colony in Jamestown, Virginia in 1619, three of whom are known to have been named Isabella, Antoney and Pedro. Isabella and Antoney had later given birth to a slave boy named William. This "William Tucker" is now considered the first African American born in the English colonies in North America. The Dutch delivered them, the British enslaved them. Note the word British.... Dont you think if the DUTCH person SOLD them to the ENGLISH colonies then they were ALREADY slaves??? Does it matter? They were brought to America, to end up as slaves to the British, it doesn't matter who brought them here, it could have been martians with flying saucers. The English introduced slavery to the US. The Dutch most certainly didn't force the Brits at gun point to take the slaves? The English never introduced slavery to the US, it was the Dutch.. Anyway as you say, does it really matter? I wasn't the one to bring the subject of slavery up and to be honest i'm not that bothered if slavery was a "British Colonial" thing... Judge people by who they are today not by things that happened far in the past. Your great granddad could have "friendly fired" and killed his allies (my relatives) but I certainly wouldn't hold it against you. I think its time to move on to more interesting topics, don't you? |
wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:26:31 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: So who are your ancestors... where did they originate from? Ireland. Yes indeed, it explains your attitude... did you hear about the Rioting in Belfast yesterday BTW...shocking... just animals.... If the Brits and their proxies would just give up their ill-gotten gains and get the hell out, it would all disappear in a minute. But no, they have to hang on like a dog with a bone. Grasping *******s. I think you'll find it's the Irish that ignore the wishes of their fellow citizens and didn't care about their rights is actually what happened. If it weren't for the RUC and the Army you would have wiped yourselves out years ago. What possible motive have people got to riot, smash up and burn cars, shoot guns at people who are trying to bring calm to the situation and murder people (sounds very NO, maybe it wasn't the blacks there it was the Irish in black balaclavas)... And as for it would all disappear in a minute you live in cloud cuckoo land. Now stop being so silly.. |
"Lancer" wrote in message news:4327e21b.29974218@2355323778... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:14:17 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Lancer" wrote in message news:4326d316.26128812@2355323778... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:27:37 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Lancer" wrote in message news:4326996c.11367359@2355323778... On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 19:36:42 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: You *******s have ****ed over every country or civilization you ever came into contact with. British Empire my ass. I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a red indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came into contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how to become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire you would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live in a mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy......... Come on now, you think everyone in the U.S.A. ancestors are english? Not at all but a good many of them are... thats also why your common language is English.... Nah, I speak american...I spent a month working in the U.K., I needed a translater.. The hardest to understand were your phone operators.. No such language as American... you will find it is English, just because you use a few different words or a few of your words have different meanings its still English.. Try phoning someone in Tyne and Wear UK and youll have even more diffuculty ;o) Of course there is such a language as American. I suppose you think Mexicans speak Spanish don't you? I have no interest or concern what language the "Mexicans" speak. America's adopted language is English and if you say otherwise you are a bloody fool..... full stop. |
It's rapidly eroding into "Ebonics".
Its eroding into something ;o) Ps, African American Vernacular English (AAVE), known colloquially as Ebonics if anyones wondering. |
The Magnum wrote:
Dont you think you have enough guns about in America? ;o) You can never have too many guns. Look at New Orleans. Chaos is only a disaster away, natural or otherwise. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message ... The Magnum wrote: Dont you think you have enough guns about in America? ;o) You can never have too many guns. Look at New Orleans. Chaos is only a disaster away, natural or otherwise. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE Ill save up and send you a tank over ;o) Graham |
The Magnum wrote:
"Lancer" wrote in message news:4327e21b.29974218@2355323778... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:14:17 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Lancer" wrote in message news:4326d316.26128812@2355323778... On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:27:37 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: "Lancer" wrote in message news:4326996c.11367359@2355323778... On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 19:36:42 +0100, "The Magnum" wrote: You *******s have ****ed over every country or civilization you ever came into contact with. British Empire my ass. I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a red indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came into contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how to become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire you would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live in a mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy......... Come on now, you think everyone in the U.S.A. ancestors are english? Not at all but a good many of them are... thats also why your common language is English.... Nah, I speak american...I spent a month working in the U.K., I needed a translater.. The hardest to understand were your phone operators.. No such language as American... you will find it is English, just because you use a few different words or a few of your words have different meanings its still English.. Try phoning someone in Tyne and Wear UK and youll have even more diffuculty ;o) Of course there is such a language as American. I suppose you think Mexicans speak Spanish don't you? I have no interest or concern what language the "Mexicans" speak. America's adopted language is English and if you say otherwise you are a bloody fool..... full stop. you are speaking as if you know what is going on here. you dont. period. spanish is the second language here and in time will be the first in certain parts of the country if not already. been to nyc recently? street signs in both languages. do i care? nope. assimilation happens. if it means my daughter has to become bilingual then so be it. i am... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com