![]() |
Mobile Installation
Ok, I have decided to go with the 102" steel whip with 6" spring for a
total of 108" or 1/4 wave. I am planning on mounting the antenna behind the driver side on the bedrail approx. 12-18" from the cab. It is an older Dodge ram long-wheel base, so the drilling is not a problem for where I am going to mount the antenna. (long wheel base may give me a real good ground plane, hopefully) I am running a Cobra 25 LTD in the truck. The antenna mounting bracket is aluminum I believe, so I may need to fabricate one myself from steel for good grounding. Also, I am hunting some coax for my base setup. I want to go with RG8 I believe, but RG58 is all I can seem to find in the 30-50' range. Will there be too much loss with the RG58? I can get a length custom made, but I need it soon and the CB shop is down for now. It is a Cobra 142 GTL radio with an Antron 99 antenna with the top section replaced with another 102" steel whip after the wind took the original someplace else. Any thoughts or suggestions on these two setups will be greatly appreciated. Thanks |
Mobile Installation
|
Mobile Installation
It should be a 50 ohm antenna. RG-8 is fine, NOT radio shack junk.
If not RG-8X (or M) is fine. If you use the 8X or M, you will need a reducer. THe one for 59 U is the one you will need, NOT a reducer for 58U. RG-8X is the physical size of RG-59U (cable stuff) For CB use, the RS RG-8m is just fine. You need RG-175 reducers for RG-58, and RG-176 reducers for RG-8m. I'm using Belden "Truck King" RG-8m that I picked up at a CB shop some years ago. I'm also using a bunch of RS RG-8m for short runs on 2 meters. (20 feet maximum) For HF, RG-8m is fine for runs of up to 50 feet. On VHF you want something better if you run more then 15 or 20 feet. Couplers get touchy at VHF. Imagine UHF!!! |
Mobile Installation
Would there be too much loss in RG-58 coax for the base? Only a 30-50'
run. I don't think the mobile installation matters all that much, but I could be wrong. I might try to find some Mini 8 for the mobile, RG 8 will prolly be too bundlesome. If not, I will try some RG-58 with it as well. Will this be going in the wrong direction entirely (too much loss)? |
Mobile Installation
Another thing, I see lots of discussion on the 102 vs 108" (spring)
whip. Does anyone have a straight answer. I can discontinue the use of the spring if it is that advantageous. Please, someone let me know. I just want (like everyone else) low SWR, and max power out the whip. Thanks again |
Mobile Installation
I use 102" whip, 6" & another 4" firestik heavy duty spring. I'm running a
magnum 257 w/extended coverage. (Hams can do that legally), my swr is darn near flat 40 above & 40 below. Experiment & see what works best for you. Every installation is different. wrote in message ups.com... Another thing, I see lots of discussion on the 102 vs 108" (spring) whip. Does anyone have a straight answer. I can discontinue the use of the spring if it is that advantageous. Please, someone let me know. I just want (like everyone else) low SWR, and max power out the whip. Thanks again |
Mobile Installation
Ken wrote:
I use 102" whip, 6" & another 4" firestik heavy duty spring. I'm running a magnum 257 w/extended coverage. (Hams can do that legally), my swr is darn near flat 40 above & 40 below. Hmmm.... You can modify any radio to operate in an amateur allocation. You can't use a Part 97 radio on any type-accepted service. I can use my 2950 on 10 meters. I'm not supposed to move the jumpers and use it on 11 meters. With that said, don't get caught. I've used my IC-2100 on MURS and my HTX-420 on FRS and my 2950 on 11 meters... (too many damn rules!) Anyone got a 420MHz AM ATV setup for sale, cheap? |
Mobile Installation
I think he might want to read over the rules again. It's a damn good
thing they make you take a test for a "ticket". ;^) |
Mobile Installation
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com