About Us

Reposted for the guys in the Pirate Radio groups:

"Bill Sohl" wrote in message
nk.net...

"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:

Dick Bash disagreed with you then and he disagrees with you now.

No.

Dick Bash disagreed with the federal government.

Yes, he did.

He violated federal law in the process.

Maybe he did and maybe he didn't. He was never charged with anything
for his publishing activities, let alone convicted. (Innocent until
proven
guilty, right?).

He should have gone to prison a long time ago.

IMHO a fine and license revocation would have been more appropriate.

Perhaps.

I think prison was more in order, but OK...take his license.

The fact is that FCC never went after him, despite folks like K2ASP
wanting to do so, because the folks at the top said no. Seems to me
there are several possible explanations for that lack of action:

1) Corruption (no evidence of that)

2) Incompetence (?)

3) Lack of hard evidence. IANAL, but IMHO the books themselves are not
hard evidence; and Bash would not have had to testify against himself.
FCC would have had to get someone with firsthand evidence of what Bash
was doing.

OK..I can buy those.

4) Unclear law. Bash didn't steal or copy the exams. He didn't ask
others to do so. All he did was ask people questions and write down
their answers. It could be argued that those who talked to Bash and
accepted the money were breaking the law, not Bash himself.

Jim, if I physically reach in to a persons wallet and take their
money, that's theft.

Of course it is theft because the person no longer has
the money. If, on the other hand, you allow me to
look in your wallet and I see you have 53 dollars, is it
theft if I tell someone else I saw $53 dollars (one 20,
three 10s and three ones).

Is it any LESS theft if I demand that they take it out and hand it
to me?

This analogy is totally off the mark because it involves
a physical removal which is NOT what Bash did.

And was it clearly spelled out to everyone who took an FCC exam that
they were not to divulge the contents of that exam?

Sure was when I tested, in Ohio, Atlanta and Long Beach, CA
offices all three. My High School science teacher who administered my
Novice read his part of the insructions which stated it was unlawful to
divulge the contents of the test.

I just don't know how many ways you can say "Don't discuss the
test", Jim!

The other legal question comes down to: is it legal to
prohibit post test discussion.

Was it clearly
spelled out in the regulations that the exams were to be kept secret
and what the penalties were for making them public? If not, FCC might
have lost a very embarrassing case had they gone after Bash.

If they HAD gone after him, at least it would have set case
law...Or at the very least SHOULD have pushed the reg writers in
Washington to "get hot".

Too late. The answer will never be known now.

5) Planning for the future. The folks at the top who did not allow
prosecution of Bash might have already been thinking of going to public
question pools when Bash did his thing. If so, it would have been a
waste of time to prosecute him, because by the time they got a verdict,
what he did would not have been an offense any more.

It's clear he violated the *spirit* of the old exam rules. But whether
he violated the *letter* of those rules, and could have been convicted,
will probably never be certain because he won't ever be charged or
tried.

Our loss, then and ever since.

A waste of tme to discuss. You can't go back and that's
the bottom line.

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
An English Teacher	FM Community Radio	CB	2	November 26th 05 02:17 AM
Bash test publishing	FM Community Radio	CB	0	November 24th 05 03:32 PM
Bash tests published	FM Community Radio	CB	0	November 24th 05 03:30 PM
The Honorable DICK BASH	whoever	Policy	0	December 24th 04 04:35 AM
Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead.	Morbeius	Policy	14	January 30th 04 09:18 PM

Menu

About Us