Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:12:38 -0000, "The Magnum"
wrote: Vinnie S." wrote in message .. . On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:14:31 -0000, "The Magnum" wrote: "Vinnie S." wrote in message .. . On 28 Nov 2005 20:36:15 -0800, "Programbo" wrote: What does everyone think is the going rate for replacing a blown final (Output transistor) in a typical CB radio at a repair shop? If it is the 1969, the part is relatively cheap. The labor is the killer. I would think it would be in the area of $50. Vinnie S. %*&$ing hell. "how much". 1969's are getting harder to source now since they have ceased production of them. The 2SC2078 10w transistor is a commonly used one in the straight 40 type rigs. Even so, id not charge any more than $25 unless there was a lot more involved than a simple tranny change...but then again, im not a shop. Regards, Graham Correct, but I think he was getting ripped off, hence $50. I think there is a better replacement than the 1969, but don't recall what it was. In any case, I would do it myself. Vinnie S. Me too. Its a pretty simple job as long as you can use a soldering iron and you have just an inkling of common sense. The New replacement for the 1969 is an ERF-2030 which is rated at 25w. It might need companion parts depending on the set up. There's more info on this on the front page of my website. Regards, Graham Why would we trust your WEB page? You have this statement on your WEB page: Remember, connect a busy system as follows, CB - Pre-amp - SWR meter - Linear - Antenna Why would you put any SWR meter before the Amp? If your SWR can't handle the power output of your amp, Do you think putting it there would give you an accurate reading of the SWR on your antenna? In fact I just had to stop typing as I was laughing some more just thinking about it.. lolol Regards Lancer |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lancer" wrote in message ews.com... On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:12:38 -0000, "The Magnum" wrote: Vinnie S." wrote in message .. . On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:14:31 -0000, "The Magnum" wrote: "Vinnie S." wrote in message .. . On 28 Nov 2005 20:36:15 -0800, "Programbo" wrote: What does everyone think is the going rate for replacing a blown final (Output transistor) in a typical CB radio at a repair shop? If it is the 1969, the part is relatively cheap. The labor is the killer. I would think it would be in the area of $50. Vinnie S. %*&$ing hell. "how much". 1969's are getting harder to source now since they have ceased production of them. The 2SC2078 10w transistor is a commonly used one in the straight 40 type rigs. Even so, id not charge any more than $25 unless there was a lot more involved than a simple tranny change...but then again, im not a shop. Regards, Graham Correct, but I think he was getting ripped off, hence $50. I think there is a better replacement than the 1969, but don't recall what it was. In any case, I would do it myself. Vinnie S. Me too. Its a pretty simple job as long as you can use a soldering iron and you have just an inkling of common sense. The New replacement for the 1969 is an ERF-2030 which is rated at 25w. It might need companion parts depending on the set up. There's more info on this on the front page of my website. Regards, Graham Why would we trust your WEB page? You dont have to trust it. Its a pointer. If your interested do a websearch and clarify anything you feel unsure of. You have this statement on your WEB page: Remember, connect a busy system as follows, CB - Pre-amp - SWR meter - Linear - Antenna Why would you put any SWR meter before the Amp? Im suprised you question that. What would you think will happen if you shove 150w upwards through a cheap basic SWR meter? If your SWR can't handle the power output of your amp, Do you think putting it there would give you an accurate reading of the SWR on your antenna? No but its going to be more realistic then it pinging off the scale with extra power going through it. If its left in line it will also cause much greater interference than being before the linear. Think about it. In fact I just had to stop typing as I was laughing some more just thinking about it.. lolol Regards Lancer Im glad you took the time to look at my site. How's the 23 channel radio going ;o) Regards, Graham -- _._. _... ._. ._ _.. .. _ _ _ Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... 73's - Graham (www.open-channel.co.uk) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "The Magnum" wrote in message ... Remember, connect a busy system as follows, CB - Pre-amp - SWR meter - Linear - Antenna Why would you put any SWR meter before the Amp? Im suprised you question that. What would you think will happen if you shove 150w upwards through a cheap basic SWR meter? If your SWR can't handle the power output of your amp, Do you think putting it there would give you an accurate reading of the SWR on your antenna? Simple, If you are running power, don't buy a cheap SWR meter. It's good to have the meter after the amp. You will need to see the reflected power in case the antenna is rejecting harmonics. At which point you should cease operation. No but its going to be more realistic then it pinging off the scale with extra power going through it. If its left in line it will also cause much greater interference than being before the linear. Think about it. I could care less what SWR the amp is showing my radio in most cases. I'll check that very occasionally. I DO CARE about overall reflected power from the antenna. This is quite important! Chad |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chad Wahls" wrote in message ... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... Remember, connect a busy system as follows, CB - Pre-amp - SWR meter - Linear - Antenna Why would you put any SWR meter before the Amp? Im suprised you question that. What would you think will happen if you shove 150w upwards through a cheap basic SWR meter? If your SWR can't handle the power output of your amp, Do you think putting it there would give you an accurate reading of the SWR on your antenna? Simple, If you are running power, don't buy a cheap SWR meter. It's good to have the meter after the amp. You will need to see the reflected power in case the antenna is rejecting harmonics. At which point you should cease operation. No but its going to be more realistic then it pinging off the scale with extra power going through it. If its left in line it will also cause much greater interference than being before the linear. Think about it. I could care less what SWR the amp is showing my radio in most cases. I'll check that very occasionally. I DO CARE about overall reflected power from the antenna. This is quite important! Chad Hi Chad, I think unless you saw the original item on my website you wouldn't have seen the "other" option directly under it which says for the better quality SWR/PWR meters to go directly before the antenna. Im not sure if Lancer is picking up on this one point and missed the next line because he was chuckling at me chuckling at him, and yes, I also agree reflected power from the Antenna is important especially when kicking power. That said its amazing to me the amount of people who go on air and seem to work reasonably well who have never even heard of a SWR meter never mind tuned in their antenna... scary stuff.......that's one of the reasons I had an accessory page on my website and a brief description in layman's terms of what they are for. Regards, Graham -- _._. _... ._. ._ _.. .. _ _ _ Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... 73's - Graham (www.open-channel.co.uk) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "The Magnum" wrote in message ... "Chad Wahls" wrote in message ... "The Magnum" wrote in message ... Hi Chad, I think unless you saw the original item on my website you wouldn't have seen the "other" option directly under it which says for the better quality SWR/PWR meters to go directly before the antenna. Im not sure if Lancer is picking up on this one point and missed the next line because he was chuckling at me chuckling at him, and yes, I also agree reflected power from the Antenna is important especially when kicking power. Ahh I can see clearly now ![]() That said its amazing to me the amount of people who go on air and seem to work reasonably well who have never even heard of a SWR meter never mind tuned in their antenna... scary stuff.......that's one of the reasons I had an accessory page on my website and a brief description in layman's terms of what they are for. Well, if they never check reflected power or don't even know what it is and their rig blows up then I guess we could call that "natural selection." At least we won't have to hear them ![]() Chad |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
183 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (30-MAR-04) | Shortwave |