Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() snip The only problem is that you never have put your 102" ss up against the antenna I am speaking of, and we should never trust the claim of others. You and me included. ====== It still astounds me that people such as you think the rest of us are so dumb as to fall for your lame-brained fallacies. Well, we aren't. I stand corrected. You should never say never. I've suggested reasons for the results, but admitted that I don't have a definitive conclusion as to WHY the results were as is,nor do I have to in order to post the results. What's the difference between that and peddling snake-oil? Because I admit that I am not sure of the reasons for the result but I am sure of the result. I am not peddling anything other than the truth. You don't have to buy it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave |