| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
January 30th 06, 09:34 AM
posted to rec.radio.cb
|
|||
|
|||
"What's the matter? Can't you afford to take a gamble?"
I expect you to do the test without any help from me. I also expect you to have an independent trusted representative confirm the validity of the test as YOU suggested. Anything short of that is worthless as is your offer. I expect -you- to back up your claims. Your tests were contradictory in their data. Your data is unconfirmed as to its validity. Your conclusions exclude the very real possibility of error or unknown variables. You refuse to back up your conclusions with theoretical constructs or additional tests. And you stick to your guns as if your word was the Holy Gospel. Yet when confronted with a challenge to your test, a challenge where you risk absolutely nothing (don't forget that you would get the antenna for your $25), with an objective and independently verified test, what you you do? You sit in the corner, pee on yourself and whine like Steve Robeson having his period. Congratulations, tnom -- you just discredited both yourself -AND- the antenna you are trying to get people to buy. BTW, the offer still stands. I expect you to try and debunk my results. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
| Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
| Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
| Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
| Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
