|
grow up
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com... Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_retard" whined in message oups.com... Dr.Death wrote: Found it. You were correct on the 3watt cell, but there it is. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...a3f2971d0137c2 grow up How does this possibly have anything to do with you Markie tard? becuase I dilike staklers This thread has nothing to do with you. if you think you canhave a private exhange over USENET you are truly as ****ed in the head as Roberson over over RRAP of Dan now hangingout some in DX If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching if you wtalk about radio in a radio gruop you can'texpect privacy Let me repeat myself. If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. The point I made was you involved yourself in something you cannot comprehend and should keep your nose out of it. But since you insist on attracting my attention, I have no problem flaming you till the cows come home. |
Ping Frank
"Steveo" wrote in message
... "Dr.Death" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message Hey, it's the principal when you're dealing with brainless sheep. :) Agreed. My shining moment in lawsuits was when I sued my own lawyer. He called me the night before court and payed me off. I carried a copy of that check for months. Get outta' Dodge, you fined your lawyer and won? I fought the lawn and the lawn won Yup, he had a murder trial to deal with on the same day as our small claim case was to be heard. I guess he didn't want a loss recorded on public record. |
grow up
Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching if you wtalk about radio in a radio gruop you can'texpect privacy Let me repeat myself. If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching The point I made was you involved yourself in something you cannot comprehend and should keep your nose out of it. I certain understand whta you are doing I have seen the method used for years Geobels is one of the more famous users of it you don't come up to his standards but no reason I shold keep my nose out of a Radio thread in radio NG But since you insist on attracting my attention, I have no problem flaming you till the cows come home. I insist on nothing but of course you will do as you choose as will I your shrill insistance that yo have the right to exclude people from discussion on USENET would be entiiring laughable, if I did not think you might be fool enough to mean it you did not quote frank corrctly you have been caught and now you lie to divert attention for your **** up old as the hills |
grow up
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com... Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching if you wtalk about radio in a radio gruop you can'texpect privacy Let me repeat myself. If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching I'm not bitching. I mearly pointed out that this thread had nothing to do with you. As you have claimed that I stalk you, it sure seems that anytime I post you feel the need to reply whether or not your name is mentioned. So don't lie about me stalking you, when you know damn good and well that you crave my negative attention. The point I made was you involved yourself in something you cannot comprehend and should keep your nose out of it. I certain understand whta you are doing I have seen the method used for years Geobels is one of the more famous users of it You truly are delusional. Now you are comparing me with (in your spelling) Geobels. I assume you mean the minister of propaganda for the nazis. Or do you mean gerbles, like the one you had to have removed from your rectum at the ER. you don't come up to his standards Maybe I should try harder. NAH! but no reason I shold keep my nose out of a Radio thread in radio NG So keep your nose in it. I'll just keep flaming you. That should make you happy as you desire the punishment. But since you insist on attracting my attention, I have no problem flaming you till the cows come home. I insist on nothing but of course you will do as you choose as will I I certainly will. your shrill insistance that yo have the right to exclude people from discussion on USENET would be entiiring laughable, if I did not think you might be fool enough to mean it I never said I had the right to control anything on Usenet, except your delicate feelings. you did not quote frank corrctly you have been caught and now you lie to divert attention for your **** up old as the hills While it may not have been word for word, after all it's been over a year since that was posted. But if you read it you will see that in essence I am correct. |
grow up
Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching if you wtalk about radio in a radio gruop you can'texpect privacy Let me repeat myself. If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching I'm not bitching. I mearly pointed out that this thread had nothing to do with you. you are bitching about my jioning in discusion The point I made was you involved yourself in something you cannot comprehend and should keep your nose out of it. I certain understand whta you are doing I have seen the method used for years Geobels is one of the more famous users of it You truly are delusional. hardly you are the one that imagines the contents of post you don't come up to his standards Maybe I should try harder. NAH! but no reason I shold keep my nose out of a Radio thread in radio NG But since you insist on attracting my attention, I have no problem flaming you till the cows come home. I insist on nothing but of course you will do as you choose as will I I certainly will. indeed and you contiue to lie your shrill insistance that yo have the right to exclude people from discussion on USENET would be entiiring laughable, if I did not think you might be fool enough to mean it I never said I had the right to control anything on Usenet, .... you said you could decide who belonged in a thread which is something on Usenet, meaning you just lied ...except your delicate feelings. as you just lied again you did not quote frank corrctly you have been caught and now you lie to divert attention for your **** up old as the hills |
grow up
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com... Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dr.Death wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching if you wtalk about radio in a radio gruop you can'texpect privacy Let me repeat myself. If I wanted a private exchange, I would do it by e-mail. then stop bitching I'm not bitching. I mearly pointed out that this thread had nothing to do with you. you are bitching about my jioning in discusion No, I mearly stated that the conversation was not directed towards you. I was not bitching, if I were I would be all over your ass. Join in for all I care, but this is a flame war between Frank and I. If you want in it, then don't cry when I flame you. The point I made was you involved yourself in something you cannot comprehend and should keep your nose out of it. I certain understand whta you are doing I have seen the method used for years Geobels is one of the more famous users of it You truly are delusional. hardly you are the one that imagines the contents of post Where? Point it out. I have asked you to do so on several occasions and you have yet to back up your claims. you don't come up to his standards Maybe I should try harder. NAH! but no reason I shold keep my nose out of a Radio thread in radio NG But since you insist on attracting my attention, I have no problem flaming you till the cows come home. I insist on nothing but of course you will do as you choose as will I I certainly will. indeed and you contiue to lie I'm not even going to address the "lie issue" any further as you are unwilling or are unable to post proof. your shrill insistance that yo have the right to exclude people from discussion on USENET would be entiiring laughable, if I did not think you might be fool enough to mean it I never said I had the right to control anything on Usenet, .... you said you could decide who belonged in a thread which is something Where did I say that? You seem to think that every post I make has something to do with you. I only stated you should keep your nose in your own buisness as the thread had nothing to do with you. You have posted enough in this thread to make it your buisness, therefore you are fair game for my amusement. on Usenet, meaning you just lied About what? I keep asking this question and you keep avoiding the answer. Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone. You toss plenty of stones as you average calling me a lier without proof at least once every post. You need to get some fresh material as this **** has grown stale. ...except your delicate feelings. as you just lied again About what? (how many times have I asked that now?) you did not quote frank corrctly you have been caught and now you lie to divert attention for your **** up old as the hills |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com