|
monthly roundup
"Scott in Baltimore" wrote in message ... http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265629A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265688A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265673A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265671A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265672A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265692A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265694A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-A1.html No one cares, dickhead. |
monthly roundup
U-Know-Who wrote: "Scott in Baltimore" wrote in message ... http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265629A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265688A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265673A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265671A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265672A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265692A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265694A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-A1.html No one cares, dickhead. they made more interesting reading than one of your posts Tom and far politeir too |
monthly roundup
"U-Know-Who" wrote:
"Scott in Baltimore" wrote in message ... http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265629A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265688A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265673A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265671A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265672A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265692A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265694A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-A1.html No one cares, dickhead. I didn't want to come off like a dick, but I couldn't understand why anyone that reads this group regular would care about that either? WTF, Scott? |
monthly roundup
Steveo wrote: "U-Know-Who" wrote: "Scott in Baltimore" wrote in message ... http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265629A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265688A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265673A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265671A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265672A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265692A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265694A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-A1.html No one cares, dickhead. I didn't want to come off like a dick, but I couldn't understand why anyone that reads this group regular would care about that either? it shows some sign the fcc is considing doing it job, mostly in isloated cases a good barometer as to the real likehood of enforcement affecting someone WTF, Scott? |
monthly roundup
I didn't want to come off like a dick, but I couldn't understand why anyone
that reads this group regular would care about that either? WTF, Scott? If you want your info to be on file at a store that's "under investigation", that's up to you. You can read the list yourself. I'm saving you the trouble of reading about the pirate FM stations, the EPIRB activations, the tower structure violations and the EAS violations. If a ham gets busted, he's listed. If a shop gets it, you know about it. You don't have to read them, you know. Skip has been rolling. Did upstate NY. That's not a easy shot from here. (There's a violation for you! :) Take care! |
monthly roundup
"Scott in Baltimore" wrote in message
... http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265629A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265688A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265673A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265671A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265672A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265692A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-265694A1.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-A1.html And? Only 2 of the 8 have anything even remotely related to the subject matter of the newsgroup... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com