| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Saturday, March 25, 2017 at 11:53:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Black wrote:
But why should five-bit code be saved? That's true - if one is concerned with saving bandwidth, which will still be a concern in some applications, no matter how technology advances - one could always use compression algorithms like those used for ZIP files, or, if simplicity is an issue, a static Huffman code. John Savard |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A Modest Proposal (it's called "satire" Roy, well adjusted people embrace satire) | Shortwave | |||
| Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | General | |||
| Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | Policy | |||
| Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | Shortwave | |||
| Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy | |||