Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marty Albert wrote:
As I recall, at 23 cm and 80 Mbps we had an effective bandwidth of around 100 KHz on the "final" design... That design incorporated TDM, limited SS, and WDM of the signals. What exactly does this all mean? Passing 80,000,000 bits/sec in 100,000Hz of bandwidth sounds pretty fantastic - to the extent that makes me question the validity of the measurements. Today, we could use TDM, WDM, SDM, high-end SS, and a few other tricks and, assuming a target data-rate of 100 Mbps, get the on air bandwidth down to around 50-75 KHz, maybe even a little less. Whoa. Hold on. Help me understand what units and methods of measurement you're using. Right now, you're off by several decimal places in even the most generous way. Dana K6JQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Free quick easy money Amazing !!!!!!!!!!!!! | Boatanchors | |||
Free quick easy money Amazing !!!!!!!!!!!!! | Boatanchors | |||
Free quick easy money Amazing !!!!!!!!!!!!! | Homebrew | |||
Free quick easy money Amazing !!!!!!!!!!!!! | Scanner |